Search Results

1. LCRO 136/2023 QT v MZ (8 January 2024) [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...with formally. I ask that you confirm your instructions on whether the deed can be signed and held by you until the end of next week. Otherwise, I must act in accordance with my instructions. I have commenced drafting the proceedings and will be filed this week (sic). Costs will be in issue. Happy to discuss. [25] On 3 February 2023, Mr PY wrote to the respondent tabling a spreadsheet recording a proposed starting valuation figure for the Property and proposed financial adjustmen...

2. [2021] NZEnvC 065 Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Incorporated v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 576 KB]

   ...Ecological Area (SEA) when the Northland Regional Plan was notified. In the Decisions Version of the plan, part of the SEA area became a Marsden Point Port Zone (MPPZ) and the SEA designation over that part was removed. [3] For est & Bird filed an appeal seeking the reinstatement of the SEA in the area. The effect being to make reclamation in the area a non-complying activity. [4] Northport Limited (Northport) are a s 274 party to the appeal. Northport agreed with the reinsert...

3. A Q v Mudaliar [2015] NZIACDT 76 (23 June 2015) [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...client confirmed the agreement in writing. The circumstances were: 4 [5.3.1] The agreement related only to the initial application, not the subsequent section 61 requests. [6] The grounds of complaint were wider; the complainant has not filed a statement of reply seeking to pursue the wider grounds of complaint. Accordingly, the Tribunal will only consider the grounds the Registrar considered to have potential support. The responses [7] The complainant did not file a st...

4. R. Singh v Kumar [2016] NZIACDT 14 (23 March 2016) [pdf, 121 KB]

   ...put forward the following background as the basis for the complaint: [15.1] The complainant engaged Mr Kumar to assist with seeking a Graduate Work Experience Visa. That occurred on 23 January 2013. They signed a written agreement, providing for fees of $1,500. Mr Kumar received an initial payment of $1,000 and issued a receipt. At the initial meeting, the complainant told Mr Kumar of potential difficulties obtaining an Employer Supplementary Form from his employer. [15.2] Mr Kumar sub...

5. Pure - Ahipara 1B2B - (2013) 69 Taitokerau MB 109 (69 TTK 109) [pdf, 117 KB]

   ...and the application must therefore be dismissed. [33] However, as noted, the solution for the dispute would appear to be clarification of the area of Jonnie’s occupation order. Jonnie indicated her surveyor could attend to this. If Jonnie files an application under s 330 of the Act to amend the occupation order within six months the filing fee is to be waived. If an application is not filed by 31 May 2014 then in my view the Registrar should of his own volition bring a s 330 ap...

6. [2023] NZEnvC 075 Gray v Dunedin City Council [pdf, 289 KB]

   ..._______________________________________________________________ A: Under s285 RMA, Dunedin City Council are to pay Mr Gray and Ms Sinclair-Gray the sum of $34,256.11, as a contribution towards its costs. 2 B: Under s286 RMA, this order may be filed with the District Court at Dunedin for enforcement purposes (if necessary). REASONS [1] The appellants appealed a decision declining resource consent for a residential activity on an undersized lot comprising 2.8ha at 68 Currie...

7. Theobald v Coulter [pdf, 170 KB]

   ...page 2 of 35 1. BACKGROUND 1.1 The Claimants lodged a claim under the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 (“the WHRS Act”). The claim was deemed to be an eligible claim under the WHRS Act. The Claimants filed a Notice of Adjudication under s.26 of the WHRS Act on 8 November 2004. 1.2 I was assigned the role of adjudicator to act for this claim. A preliminary conference was arranged to be held in Tauranga on 26 November 2004 for the purp

8. Landon v Auckland Council [2012] NZWHT Auckland 12 [pdf, 78 KB]

   ...nor Mr Middleton called any evidence on this issue and the onus was on them to do so. [16] I conclude that it should have been apparent to Mr Matthews and Mr Middleton, particularly as they were legally represented, that by the time they filed their responses to the claim that their allegations against IAG lacked substantial merit. For these reasons, and because the defence costs sought far exceeded IAG’s potential liability, the decision by Mr Matthews and Mr Middleton to...

9. Brown - Waipaoa 1A1 (1993) 33 Tairawhiti Appellate MB 74 (33 APGS 74) [pdf, 248 KB]

   ...(for the Appellants) Mrs Bev Murray (for the Maori Trustee) HEARING: 23 August 1993, Mr Barber: I have prepared a synopsis in my argument. With respect to these two blocks, the full facts are set out particularly well in folio 140 of the application file 9179, As it appears from the records they are two very large blocks. One Waipaoa 1AI which is part of Arowhana which is one of our local mountains here, is virtually land locked. The company of Hukurangi Forest Farms which appears throughout...

10. BG v YQ LCRO 161 / 2010 (4 April 2011) [pdf, 94 KB]

    ...This was known to the Applicant at the time she agreed to allow the Practitioner to do the legal work on the sale. The Applicant was represented by a barrister, Ms BH, in these other matrimonial matters. 2 [4] The Standards Committee file that was obtained for the review contained copies of numerous exchanges between Ms BH and the Practitioner concerning relationship property and other matters involving the care of children, and also the drafting of a Section 21 agreement....