Search Results

1. [2024] NZEnvC 205 Rosemarke Investments Ltd v Auckland Council [pdf, 278 KB]

   ...evidence, and further allegations were raised in legal submissions. The Council submitted that Rosemarke kept changing and altering its case, and it was continually having to respond to new allegations. [10] The Council submitted that the evidence filed by Rosemarke was unnecessarily complex. Rosemarke re-created the Council’s original timesheets adding its own amendments. It made a summary of the application plans, adding emails and comments rather than attaching the actual doc...

2. Abernethy v Coughlan [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...alleged negligent misstatements, and thirdly a breach of the Fair Trading Act 1986, by Mr Beazley. [23] The total amount of the claim is now $334,846.10, comprising: (a) $201,568.06 for repair costs (b) $39,100.00 for professional fees (c) $30,225.00 for consequential losses (d) $3,953.04 for costs incurred mitigating loss (e) $60,000.00 for general damages [24] This figure is inclusive of GST but excludes interest and costs. Adju...

3. Justice Statistics data tables - notes and trends June 2019 [pdf, 381 KB]

   ...have been 130 ‘strangulation/suffocation’ charges finalised since the offence was introduced in December 2018. These 130 finalised charges represent only a small proportion of the total number of 'strangulation/suffocation' charges filed. Of the charges finalised, 36% were convicted and 63% had a 'not proved' outcome (all of which were withdrawn or discharged). However, as most charges filed are awaiting a trial and charge outcome or sentencing, these f...

4. Taia v Taia – Taia Whānau Trust (2015) 132 Waiariki MB 146 (132 WAR 146) [pdf, 217 KB]

   ...2015 (Heard at Rotorua) Judgment: 04 December 2015 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE M P ARMSTRONG Copies to: 132 Waiariki MB 147 Introduction [1] On 5 December 2013 Kiritana Debbie Taia filed an application to review the Taia Whānau Trust (“the trust”) per s 231 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 (“the Act”). At the hearing on 4 August 2014 Ms Taia sought orders removing Coraglen Tapuke Paora Taia and Tania Girlie T...

5. Huang v Leung [2010] NZWHT Auckland 16 [pdf, 284 KB]

   ...which included Mr Chen and Mr Piggin, who had accepted instructions to act as counsel on behalf of Mr Chen. An adjudication hearing was then set to commence on 8 April 2010 at 10am. Page | 8 [15] On Wednesday 31 March 2010 Mr Piggin filed the following documents on behalf of Mr Chen: a) Response to Amended Statement of Claim b) Brief of Evidence of Mr Sean Chen; c) Brief of Evidence of Rui Jiang d) Brief of Evidence of Bin Chen e) Brief of Evidence of James Barr...

6. OIA-107459.pdf [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...receipt in a timely and accurate manner • Generate orders, summons, warrants and notices as required • Check documents and enter case information into Case Management System (CMS), assign track if required • Provide information to person filing documents on the next steps in Court process and provide key contact details for future contact • Exercise Deputy Registrar powers/Registrar of Marriages (as applicable) in accordance with legislative requirements and Ministry gui...

7. Mann v Accident Compensation Corporation (Jurisdiction, Social Rehabilitation, Costs on Review) [2023] NZACC 91 [pdf, 365 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 91 ACR 138/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN SHANE MANN Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 1 June 2023 Held at: Hamilton/Kirikiriroa Appearances: K Koloni for Mr Mann F Becroft for the Accident Compensation Corporation Judgment

8. Holden & Anor as Trustees of the Estate of Bruce Morris v Hanns [2010] NZWHT Wellington 23 [pdf, 432 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2008-101-000109 [2010] NZWHT WELLINGTON 23 BETWEEN ALISTER HOLDEN AND MURRAY BRIDGE AS TRUSTEES OF THE ESTATE OF BRUCE MORRIS Claimants AND PETER HANNS TRADING AS HANNS BUILDERS & JOINERS First Respondent AND ROGER WALKER ARCHITECTS LTD Second Respondent AND WELLINGTON CITY COUNCIL Third Respondent AND DION BARETA (Removed) Fourth Respondent AND K ROAD NO 1 LIMITED Fifth Respondent AND STOANZ LIMITED (Remo

9. Hauora-Chapt10W.pdf [pdf, 1 MB]

   HAU O R A Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz W A I T A N G I T R I B U N A L R E P O R T 2 0 2 1 W A I 2 5 7 5 H A U O R A Report on Stage One of the Health Services and Outcomes Kaupapa Inquiry Chapter 10 P r e - p u b l i c a t i o n V e r s i o n Downloaded f

10. [2012] NZEmpC 185 Yang v L E Builders Ltd [pdf, 165 KB]

    ...Judgment: 29 October 2012 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS Introduction [1] This is a de novo challenge from a determination of the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority). 1 The Authority dismissed a personal grievance filed on Mr Yang’s behalf, finding that he was a contractor rather than an employee. The challenge proceeded by way of formal proof hearing. Counsel acting for the defendant company had previously been granted leave to withdraw, and the comp...