7638 items matching your search terms
...2 OVERVIEW PROCEDURAL CONSIDERATIONS Page Representation 3 You are entitled to represent yourself or have a lawyer represent you. If you want a lay person to represent you, you must apply in writing to the Tribunal. Filing Documents with Tribunal 3 There are specific requirements when filing documents with the Tribunal. Serving Documents on Other Parties 4 There are specific requirements when serving documents on other parties. S...
...3, 2011 http://www.oecd.org/daf/anti-bribery/ConvCombatBribery_ENG.pdf� http://www.oecd.org/daf/anti-bribery/ConvCombatBribery_ENG.pdf� https://www.unodc.org/documents/brussels/UN_Convention_Against_Corruption.pdf� http://www.apec.org/~/media/Files/Groups/ACT/04_amm_032rev1.pdf� http://www.ungift.org/doc/knowledgehub/resource-centre/CSOs/TI-Working_Paper_Human_Trafficking_28_Jun_2011.pdf� http://www.ungift.org/doc/knowledgehub/resource-centre/CSOs/TI-Working_Paper_Human_Trafficking...
...interim injunction complaint in its decision. 41 At [22]. 42 At [22]. 43 At [22]. 44 At [23]. 45 At [31]. 46 At [32]. 47 At [34]. 14 Application for review [55] Mr TM filed an application for review on 6 August 2013. He seeks a review of the Standards Committee’s decision to take no further action and points to a number of errors he states that the Committee made in its decision. [56] He states that hi...
KELLY v NELSON CITY COUNCIL – CONSENT ORDER IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 205 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under s120 of the Act BETWEEN LINDY KELLY (ENV-2022-CHC-60) Appellant AND NELSON CITY COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge J J M Hassan – sitting alone under s279 of the Act In Chambers at Christchurch Date of Consent Order: 20 September 2023
...Claimants claimed: (a) a total of $30,000.00 - $15,000.00 each (for Mr S Middlemass and Mrs S Middlemass) by way of general damages for stress and anxiety; (b) an unspecified amount for costs and indicated that costs including legal and expert fees and disbursements were in the region of $77,000.00 to $82,000.00. Later this was quantified to a total of $78,998.90 (including GST) – for legal fees, disbursements and expert fees. 17 [48] The Claimants maintained th...
...initially proposed. This will give prospective interested parties an 3 Paragraph 5 of the Minute. Page 5 opportunity to review the Transport Agency's evidence ahead of the due date for filing section 274 notices, before the pre-hearing conference and mediation, and well before filing their own evidence (which is proposed to occur on 4 August 2020). The proposed timetable also retains the 20 July 2020 date for the Transpor...
...initially proposed. This will give prospective interested parties an 3 Paragraph 5 of the Minute. Page 5 opportunity to review the Transport Agency's evidence ahead of the due date for filing section 274 notices, before the pre-hearing conference and mediation, and well before filing their own evidence (which is proposed to occur on 4 August 2020). The proposed timetable also retains the 20 July 2020 date for the Transpor...
...JUDGMENT AS TO COSTS OF JUDGE D J AMBLER Introduction [1] This judgment concerns an outstanding issue of costs arising from injunction proceedings issued in early 2008 and finally disposed of by me on 11 July 2008. Submissions on costs were filed by counsel in July and August 2008. I subsequently advised counsel in a minute1 that, in light of an appeal against my decision in Samuels v Matauri X Incorporation2 1 140 Whangarei MB 79...
...determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN MURRAY KNAPP Plaintiff AND LOCKTITE ALUMINIUM SPECIALITIES LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers filed on 19 and 22 June and 16 July 2015 Appearances: W Reid, advocate for plaintiff P Kotze, advocate for defendant Judgment: 28 July 2015 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS [1] The defendant has...
...intended to provide a flexible, efficient and low cost method of determining appeals from Committee decisions. For this reason, the Tribunal is able to regulate its own procedure and is not bound by traditional rules of evidence, ss 105(1) and 109. No fees are charged for bringing an appeal. … 4. Interlocutory Applications 4.1 This appeal has involved a high number of interlocutory applications. It is submitted that the approach being taken in this regard is not consistent...