Search Results

1. Tane-Stockler - Hauturu East 8 (2002) 120 Otorohanga MB 3 (120 OT 3) [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   ...that there can be no succession. COpy TO: Ol20A.thc\3·12 Otorohanga Minute Book Volume 120 Folio 12 Page 10 The applicants have made their application in reliance on the Court's title. In the circumstances it is appropriate that their fees be refunded and I direct accordingly. Dated at Hamilton this 10th day of May 2002 .. ~~ ............. , .... " JUDGE G D CARTER The Applicants and to ali interested parties Recorded on the Court files....

2. [2020] NZIACDT 29 - Immigration New Zealand (Carley) v Penty (6 July 2020) [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...the adviser’s unlawful delegation of control of the visa application and management of the client relationship to the staff of IPS/BNAC. [8] Mr Cleland had been disciplined in respect of 12 Filipino clients, with the applications having been filed with Immigration New Zealand in September and October 2016. The complaint against Ms Penty concerned 11 Filipino clients for whom she had acted between about March 2017 and August 2018. [9] The standard arrangement saw IPS/BNAC source...

3. Angell - Part Nukuroa 2A3C2 and Lot 2 DP37299 (2019) 198 Taitokerau MB 231 (198 TTK 231) [pdf, 447 KB]

   ...25433, Wellington cameron@bennion.co.nz mailto:cameron@bennion.co.nz 198 Taitokerau MB 232 Introduction [1] Part Nukuroa 2A3C2 and Lot 2 DP 37299 are adjoining blocks of Māori freehold land located in Oruawharo. Three applications have been filed seeking a combined partition of the applicants’ interests in these blocks. The issue in this case is whether the combined partitions should be granted. Background [2] Part Nukuroa 2A3C2 (“Nukuroa”) is 62.615 hectares i...

4. [2025] NZEmpC 216 Pulse 2012 Limited t/a Browne Street Cafe v Stewart [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...substantive and costs determinations of the Authority and applied for an application for stay of execution of the Authority’s orders in the substantive and costs determinations. The application is opposed by Mr Stewart. [5] Mr Stewart has filed an application for security for costs and stay of proceedings pending payment into Court of $20,000 to be held as security for costs. The application is made on the basis that there is a reasonable belief that Pulse will not be able to...

5. LCRO 109/2020 SV v FT (28 January 2021) [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...filed on 10 June 2020, 4 days out of time. [42] Mr FT was provided with a copy of Mr SV’s review application on 15 June 2020 and informed that the Review Officer would be making a decision as to whether the application would be accepted for filing out of time. [43] As at 15 June 2020, Mr FT had taken no steps to exercise his right to review the Committee decision and was out of time to do so. [44] On 29 June 2020, the parties were advised that I had satisfied myself that that...

6. Monschau v Bamber - Tahorakuri A No 1 Section 33A2 [2016] Maori Appellate Court MB 286 (2016 APPEAL 286) [pdf, 264 KB]

   ...Anne were not pleaded by the appellants in the lower Court, and there is resulting prejudice to the respondents in being required to respond to unpleaded allegations. [17] In reply, the appellants referred to their pleadings dated 10 July 2014, filed in the lower Court. Those pleadings contained the claims regarding constructive trust, unjust enrichment, trespass, and that the Bambers received a grazing fee without any legal basis for granting a lease over the land. Further, while...

7. AL v ZO LCRO 24 / 2010 (27 August 2010) [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...about the terms upon which the $20,000.00 was held in Trust, and what progress the purchasers had made with regards to resolving the access, and any other relevant information. Complaints [8] Complaints about the Practitioner were eventually filed by ZO on behalf of ZN. It appears that it was ZO‟s dissatisfaction with the Practitioner‟s response (or lack of response) to those enquiries that led to her lodging a complaint with the New Zealand Law Society. The main complaint...

8. [2022] NZACC 195– Lisale v ACC (6 October 2022) [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...Corporation granted cover for a sprain or partial tear of the right knee and lateral collateral ligament. 4 From 30 July 2019, he was paid weekly compensation, at the rate of $273.59 per week. [14] On 25 July 2019, a late review application was filed by Mr Hinchcliff, against the Corporation’s 18 March 2019 decision. On 1 August 2019, Simon Bates, the Corporation’s Technical Advisor, noted that no medical certificate had been provided beyond 23 February 2019; and that t...

9. CEIT Annual Report 2022 [pdf, 446 KB]

   ...Homeowners typically choose to bring their disputes to the Tribunal because: (a) they seek early resolution of the dispute; (b) the process is less adversarial than in a court and is easier to negotiate without a lawyer; (c) the Tribunal has no filing or hearing fees; and (d) they do not face an award of costs against them if their claim is unsuccessful. [23] As at 30 June 2022, 136 claims had been lodged with the Tribunal, of which 130 were accepted to continue as active claims,...

10. [2015] NZEmpC 230 FIRST Union Inc v Jacks Hardware and Timber Ltd [pdf, 365 KB]

    FIRST UNION INC v JACKS HARDWARE AND TIMBER LIMITED T/A MITRE 10 MEGA, DUNEDIN, AND MITRE 10, MOSGIEL NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 230 [17 December 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 230 EMPC 175/2015 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN FIRST UNION INC Plaintiff AND JACKS HARDWARE AND TIMBER LIMITED T/A MITRE 10 MEGA, DUNEDIN, AND MITRE 10, MOSGIEL Defendant