Search Results

Search results for filing fees.

7638 items matching your search terms

  1. [2009] NZEmpC AC 26/09 Merchant v CE of the Department of Corrections [pdf, 35 KB]

    ...Judgment: 25 June 2009 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE A A COUCH [1] I gave my substantive judgment in this matter on 17 December 2008. I concluded by encouraging the parties to agree costs if possible or, if they were unable to do so, directed that they file memoranda. They have now filed memoranda. [2] Clause 19(1) of Schedule 3 to the Employment Relations Act 2000 confers on the Court a broad discretion to make orders as to costs but, as with all such discretions, it must be exerci...

  2. Te Hiwi v Tahamata Incorporation (2005) 148 Aotea MB 265 (148 AOT 265) [pdf, 606 KB]

    ...Incorporation Section 280, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 John Te Hiwi, in person Mr E A Macdonald for the Tahamata Incorporation 2 December 2003, 16 March 2004 RESERVED DECISION On 2 September 2003 John Te Hiwi ("the Applicant") filed an application pursuant to section 280 of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act ("the Act") for an investigation into the affairs of an incorporation called Tahamata ("the Incorporation"). The principal ground for seeking an investi...

  3. Gupta v Dhar [2016] NZIACDT 65 (4 October 2016) [pdf, 208 KB]

    ...referred this complaint to the Tribunal. The background to the complaint is: [1.1] Mr Dhar’s client sought advice regarding a letter from Immigration New Zealand, the letter expressed concerns relating to a work visa application. [1.2] Mr Dhar filed an expression of interest (EOI), which was selected. However Immigration New Zealand declined the first work visa application; a second work visa application that Mr Dhar prepared. [1.3] Mr Dhar filed a residence application; Immigra...

  4. Justice Statistics data tables - notes and trends December 2019 [pdf, 183 KB]

    ...Children and young people with charges finalised in any court In 2019, 1,467 children and young people had charges finalised in any court (this includes Youth, District and High Courts). Despite the inclusion of 17- year olds with charges filed from July 2019 onwards, there were 162 (10%) fewer children and young people in total in 2019 than in 2018.4,5 In 2019, 8% of all children and young people with charges finalised in court were 17 years old (114 people; although they...

  5. Legal Submissions for Wellington International Airport Limited (dated 13 April 2018) [pdf, 114 KB]

    ............................................................................................................ 13 Page 3 of 14 WEL98526 6576933.1 Legal submissions for Wellington International Airport Limited INTRODUCTION 1. These submissions are filed on behalf of Wellington International Airport Limited (WIAL) in accordance with the Eighteenth Minute of the Environment Court dated 19 March 2018 and in advance of the judicial conference scheduled to address WIAL’s reques...

  6. [2021] NZSSAA 9 (26 March 2021) [pdf, 204 KB]

    ...Temporary Additional Support, effective 15 July 2019. The Ministry said that it made this decision because it was unable to establish the appellant’s accommodation costs. The decision was upheld by a Benefits Review Committee and the appellant filed his appeal on 4 June 2020. [2] As part of his appeal the appellant asked that amounts he says are owed by the Ministry to three of his boarders be paid to him. The Authority has no jurisdiction 2 over these matters as t...

  7. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Sensible Sentencing Group Trust (Application by Victims to be Heard) [2013] NZHRRT 26 [pdf, 79 KB]

    ...be no search of the Tribunal file without leave of the Chairperson. [2] There has been no appeal against that decision nor any review under s 96 of the Human Rights Act. However, on or about 17 July 2013 the Sensible Sentencing Group Trust (SSGT) filed in the High Court at Wellington an application for judicial review seeking (inter alia) an order quashing the interim orders. The judicial review proceedings have not yet been heard and are not of direct relevance to the issues addressed...

  8. BMN v Stonewood Group Ltd [2024] NZHRRT 64 [pdf, 324 KB]

    ...return of his personal information; [98.2] $45.87 for a USB drive purchased at the request of Mr Bennett for the personal information to be transferred on to; and [98.3] $50.00 late payment fee charged by Inland Revenue Department for late filing of his tax return due to not having access to his personal information. [99] The Tribunal is satisfied that the expenses described above were reasonably incurred by BMN as a direct result of the interference by Stonewood with BMN’s pri...

  9. Pai - Waihi Kahakaharoa 3B2A and Waihi Kahakaharoa 9A (2019) 407 Aotea MB 180 (407 AOT 180) [pdf, 107 KB]

    ...2019. Judge Savage recused himself and the matter was adjourned for a special sitting of the Court.2 I heard the matter on 17 June 2019.3 [18] At the conclusion of the hearing I reserved my decision and directed that further information be filed. Various documents referred to at hearing were subsequently filed with the Court, including minutes of Trust meetings and the email correspondence between the trustees. Information was received from Mr Livingstone on 8 and 26 August 2019...

  10. Shadforth (Appeal) [2019] NZIACDT 42 (20 June 2019) [pdf, 176 KB]

    ...New Zealand. The Registrar, the head of the Authority, decided not to refer the complaint to the Tribunal. [4] On 14 November 2014, on appeal by MBL, the Tribunal overturned that decision and directed the Registrar to prepare the complaint for filing with the Tribunal.1 A statement of complaint was duly filed by the Authority on 30 June 2015. [5] The Tribunal upheld the complaint against Ms Shadforth in a decision issued on 18 May 2016.2 It arose from Ms Shadforth’s represent...