Search Results

1. JY v QD LCRO 111 / 2011 (10 September 2012) [pdf, 70 KB]

   ...rather were a result on the part of AEU who wrongly paid the funds to QC. [12] Two other arguments are raised on review. First, that the omission to pay the $1,000 bequest was an error of an unnamed solicitor in the firm who was handling the file and not of Mr JY. Second that his co-trustee refused to make payments under the power of advancement to Ms QD. [13] Mr JY has accepted that there was an oversight in respect of the payment of the $1,000 legacy and has apologised for th...

2. [2017] NZEmpC 19 Lewis v Silver Fern Farms Ltd [pdf, 141 KB]

   ...of a further $1,000 because of the extra work required to address additional evidence introduced by the Inspector. Silver Fern’s submissions do not provide a break-down as to how that further sum is calculated but, on the basis that the other fees charged to it were at the rate of $330 per hour, the amount sought represents approximately three hours’ work (GST has not been referred to). Assessed in another way, the total now sought, including an uplift, is approximately 78 per...

3. LCRO 236/2017 HC and CI v PR (10 December 2019) [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...The first of those, from Ms ET at [Law firm A], relates to advice the complainants sought regarding leverage and avenues for recovery as against the vendor and their neighbour. Ms ET’s advice appears to have encompassed a review of Mr PR’s file. That advice may have touched in some way on Mr PR’s involvement in the complainants’ purchase, and the fact that the complainants have a statutory right to make a complaint about the conduct, service and fees of any lawyer, includi...

4. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Crampton [2015] NZHRRT 35 [pdf, 151 KB]

   ...grounds, one of the listed exceptions applies. The Director’s case is that by disclosing the letter Mr Crampton interfered with the privacy of the President and that the Tribunal should grant the various remedies sought in the statement of claim filed on 20 May 2014. Mr Crampton’s case is that there was no breach of Principle 11 because in terms of exception (a), he believed, on reasonable grounds, disclosure of the information was directly related to the purposes in connection with...

5. Directory of Official Information 2019 D-F [pdf, 695 KB]

   Directory of Official Information Listings D-F About This is a living document; we endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email official.correspondence@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. official.correspondence@justice.govt.nz Ministerial Services Strategy, Governance & Finance mailto:official.correspondence@justice.govt.nz mailto:off

6. Directory of Official Information 2019 D-F [pdf, 890 KB]

   Directory of Official Information Listings D-F About This is a living document. We endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email oia@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. We can send you a MS Word version if you need. Ministerial Relations and Services Strategy, Governance & Finance Ministry of Justice | Tāhū o te Ture oia@justice.govt.nz ma

7. Taueki v Procter - Horowhenua 11 Lake Block (2020) 415 Aotea MB 1 (415 AOT 1) [pdf, 720 KB]

   415 Aotea MB 1 I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O AOTEA In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Aotea District A20180004434 A20180004854 A20180006936 WĀHANGA Under Sections 43. 19(1)(a). (b). (c), 238, 239 and 240, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Horowhenua 11 (Lake) Block I WAENGA I A Between PHILLIP TAUEKI AND CHARLES RUDD Ngā Kaitono Applicants ME And JONATHAN PROCTER, MATHEW SWORD,

8. [2014] NZEmpC 231 Premier Events Group Ltd and Anor v Beattie and Ors [pdf, 685 KB]

   ...PREMIER EVENTS GROUP LIMITED First Defendant AND BA PARTNERS LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION AND RECEIVERSHIP) Hearing: 30 April, 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15 and 16 May 2012 and by written memoranda filed on 17 May and 1 June 2012 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: AJ Lloyd and V Hodgson, counsel for Premier Events Group Limited D Neutze and N Lord, counsel for BA Partners Limited (in liquidation and receivership) J Eichelbaum...

9. [2016] NZEmpC 77 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 301 KB]

   ...consider the application made against Ms Alim, and then the applications made against PRI and Mr Nathan. What led to an application for disclosure? [4] Following the substantive judgment, each party made applications against the other, and filed memoranda describing the amounts sought. Ms Alim’s counsel, Mr O’Brien, sought an award totalling $240,000.04 plus GST, for the interlocutory matters and the substantive challenge. Ms Alim also challenged the Employment Relations A...

10. Edwards - Maraehako C3D (2006) 91 Opotiki MB 26 (91 OPO 26) [pdf, 761 KB]

    ...lvlaraehako C3D. (See NZ Gazette 114/2430, 1717/1984) The trustees Alice Snlith and Te Kani Rei administer this reservation. [4] On 3 July 1995, the Maori Land Court constituted an ahu wheuna tnlst over the remaining land pursuant to an application filed by Te Kani Rei. On that same day the Court appointed the following people trustees: Te Kani Rei Takapuna Rei • Beatrice Rei • Sanl Rei • Charlie Rei • Pihi Rei APPLICATION A20040001708 [5] It seems tha{ a trustee...