Search Results

1. [2006] NZEmpC AC 24A/06 Designlink Ltd t/a Rodney Wayne Hairdressing Whangaparaoa & Pipes v Raymond [pdf, 37 KB]

   ...defendant’s favour should be only “modest”. I do not agree in principle, but accept the accuracy of some of Mr Harrison’s criticisms of the makeup of the amount claimed. [20] The plaintiffs criticise the makeup of the defendant’s legal fees and disbursements as follows. It is correct, as Mr Harrison points out, that the first three bills of costs, going to make up the total of about $29,000 in legal expenses, deal with Ms Raymond’s representation in the Employment Rela...

2. Tucker v CAC 20006 & Claydon [2012] NZREADT 46 [pdf, 41 KB]

   ...and modified them by imposing our own findings of unsatisfactory conduct against Ms Claydon we accordingly invite submissions from counsel as to penalty. [20] The submissions from the appellant and the Complaints Assessment Committee should be filed within 10 days of the date of this decision. [21] Counsel for the second respondents will have a further 10 days to respond to those submissions. The counsel for the appellant will have a further three 6 days to make any co...

3. Wilson - Bruce Bay Block XIV section 781A (2005) 110 South Island MB 80 (110 SI 80) [pdf, 449 KB]

   ...provides enhancing business efficiency. " The application was then heard by me at Christchurch on 5 October 2004 at 109 South Island MB 127. After hearing from counsel and the Applicant, I adjourned the proceedings for 40 days to enable counsel to file further written submission, taking into account relevant case law. Final submissions were received on 15 November 2004. Counsel's Submissions In summary, counsel submitted that: (a) the Applicant has lived most of his life o...

4. 2022-03-18 QLDC - Opening Submissions [PDF, 187 KB]

   ...PDP’s earthworks rules are appropriate and will result in improved earthworks management as compliance levels rise to meet the new standards. 1.4 When Otago Regional Council promulgated Plan Change 8 (PC8) to the ORPW QLDC made a submission and filed a s 274 notice to join this proceeding. QLDC’s primary concerns were: (a) Whether PC8 would necessitate a variation to the PDP’s just-settled earthworks rules; (b) The potential for inconsistency between conditions imposed on eart...

5. Justice Statistics data tables - notes and trends June 2020 [pdf, 246 KB]

   ...(64%) were convicted and 24% had a 'not proved' outcome. Strangulation/suffocation - in 2019/2020 there were 1,037 charges finalised. Of these, 45% were convicted and 53% had a 'not proved' outcome. However, as many charges filed for these offences are awaiting a trial and charge outcome or sentencing, these figures do not represent the expected distribution of charge outcomes (which should be observed once more charges have been finalised). Therefore, th...

6. LCDT Annual Report 2025 [pdf, 509 KB]

   ...harassment, require careful management. Processes The Chair and Deputy Chair convene pre-hearing conferences for each case, in order to isolate the issues to be determined, and identify any areas of agreement. Directions are made for the filing of evidence and other matters required to progress to a hearing. A later, setting-down conference is held, to accurately estimate the duration of the hearing. These conferences are usually conducted by telephone, to minimise c...

7. Strengthening the family justice system - Word version [docx, 1.2 MB]

   [image: ] [bookmark: _GoBack]Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excludes any and all liability of any kind to any person or entity that chooses to rely upon the information. ISBN 978-0-478-32475-

8. Strengthening the family justice system - PDF version [pdf, 2 MB]

   Strengthening the family justice system A consultation document released by the Independent Panel examining the 2014 family justice reforms January 2019 1 Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in

9. Hutcheson v Houkamau - Porangahau 2B No 10 (2021) 88 Takitimu MB 118 (88 TKT 118) [pdf, 581 KB]

   ...as at the date of the issue of this judgment, have not been complied with, according to the Deputy Registrar. Ko te hātepe ture o te tono nei Procedural history The application for an inquiry into Rongomaraeroa Marae Māori Reservation was filed on 27 July 2018. Directions were issued on 14 August 2018 for the application and supporting documents to be sent to the trustees, who were given the opportunity to file a response within one month. Mr Watson filed a memorandum in repl...

10. Roos v Wang [2010] NZWHT Auckland 10 [pdf, 288 KB]

    ...any errors in the assessment. The Roos, acting in reliance on the report, settled the agreement for sale and purchase and took possession of their new home. [3] In 2005-2006 the Roos discovered that their house was leaking. A claim was filed with WHRS and the assessor’s report concluded that the house had major weathertight defects requiring significant repairs. The house has since been repaired by way of a full reclad. [4] In these proceedings, the Roos seek to...