Search Results

1. [2021] NZEmpC 180 Scullin v Airways Corp of New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...[55] Having succeeded in defending this challenge, Airways is entitled to apply for costs. It ought to endeavour to agree those with Mr Scullin, but, if no agreement can be reached, Airways may make an application for costs by way of memorandum filed and served no later than 20 working days after the date of this judgment. Mr Scullin then may file and serve a memorandum in response within another 15 working days, with Airways having a further five working days within which to file a...

2. [2024] NZEnvC 205 Rosemarke Investments Ltd v Auckland Council [pdf, 278 KB]

   ...evidence, and further allegations were raised in legal submissions. The Council submitted that Rosemarke kept changing and altering its case, and it was continually having to respond to new allegations. [10] The Council submitted that the evidence filed by Rosemarke was unnecessarily complex. Rosemarke re-created the Council’s original timesheets adding its own amendments. It made a summary of the application plans, adding emails and comments rather than attaching the actual doc...

3. Justice Statistics data tables - notes and trends June 2019 [pdf, 381 KB]

   ...have been 130 ‘strangulation/suffocation’ charges finalised since the offence was introduced in December 2018. These 130 finalised charges represent only a small proportion of the total number of 'strangulation/suffocation' charges filed. Of the charges finalised, 36% were convicted and 63% had a 'not proved' outcome (all of which were withdrawn or discharged). However, as most charges filed are awaiting a trial and charge outcome or sentencing, these f...

4. Huang v Leung [2010] NZWHT Auckland 16 [pdf, 284 KB]

   ...which included Mr Chen and Mr Piggin, who had accepted instructions to act as counsel on behalf of Mr Chen. An adjudication hearing was then set to commence on 8 April 2010 at 10am. Page | 8 [15] On Wednesday 31 March 2010 Mr Piggin filed the following documents on behalf of Mr Chen: a) Response to Amended Statement of Claim b) Brief of Evidence of Mr Sean Chen; c) Brief of Evidence of Rui Jiang d) Brief of Evidence of Bin Chen e) Brief of Evidence of James Barr...

5. OIA-107459.pdf [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...receipt in a timely and accurate manner • Generate orders, summons, warrants and notices as required • Check documents and enter case information into Case Management System (CMS), assign track if required • Provide information to person filing documents on the next steps in Court process and provide key contact details for future contact • Exercise Deputy Registrar powers/Registrar of Marriages (as applicable) in accordance with legislative requirements and Ministry gui...

6. Mann v Accident Compensation Corporation (Jurisdiction, Social Rehabilitation, Costs on Review) [2023] NZACC 91 [pdf, 365 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 91 ACR 138/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN SHANE MANN Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 1 June 2023 Held at: Hamilton/Kirikiriroa Appearances: K Koloni for Mr Mann F Becroft for the Accident Compensation Corporation Judgment

7. Holden & Anor as Trustees of the Estate of Bruce Morris v Hanns [2010] NZWHT Wellington 23 [pdf, 432 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2008-101-000109 [2010] NZWHT WELLINGTON 23 BETWEEN ALISTER HOLDEN AND MURRAY BRIDGE AS TRUSTEES OF THE ESTATE OF BRUCE MORRIS Claimants AND PETER HANNS TRADING AS HANNS BUILDERS & JOINERS First Respondent AND ROGER WALKER ARCHITECTS LTD Second Respondent AND WELLINGTON CITY COUNCIL Third Respondent AND DION BARETA (Removed) Fourth Respondent AND K ROAD NO 1 LIMITED Fifth Respondent AND STOANZ LIMITED (Remo

8. Hauora-Chapt10W.pdf [pdf, 1 MB]

   HAU O R A Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz W A I T A N G I T R I B U N A L R E P O R T 2 0 2 1 W A I 2 5 7 5 H A U O R A Report on Stage One of the Health Services and Outcomes Kaupapa Inquiry Chapter 10 P r e - p u b l i c a t i o n V e r s i o n Downloaded f

9. Taia v Taia – Taia Whānau Trust (2015) 132 Waiariki MB 146 (132 WAR 146) [pdf, 217 KB]

   ...2015 (Heard at Rotorua) Judgment: 04 December 2015 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE M P ARMSTRONG Copies to: 132 Waiariki MB 147 Introduction [1] On 5 December 2013 Kiritana Debbie Taia filed an application to review the Taia Whānau Trust (“the trust”) per s 231 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 (“the Act”). At the hearing on 4 August 2014 Ms Taia sought orders removing Coraglen Tapuke Paora Taia and Tania Girlie T...

10. [2011] NZEmpC 1 Gyenge v Clifford Lamar Limited [pdf, 221 KB]

    EMMA GYENGE V CLIFFORD LAMAR LIMITED NZEmpC AK [2011] NZEMPC 1 [10 January 2011] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2011] NZEMPC 1 ARC 65/10 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN EMMA GYENGE Plaintiff AND CLIFFORD LAMAR LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 10 November 2010 11 November 2010 22 November 2010 Appearances: Jan Gyenge, Agent for Plaintiff Clifford Harris, Agent for Defendant Ju