Search Results

1. Smitheram v Hanns [2010] NZWHT Wellington 24 [pdf, 483 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2009-101- 000048 [2010] NZWHT WELLINGTON 24 BETWEEN VIVIENNE SMITHERAM AND BERNARD MCBRIDE Claimants AND PETER HANNS TRADING AS HANNS BUILDERS & JOINERS First Respondent AND ROGER WALKER ARCHITECTS LTD Second Respondent AND WELLINGTON CITY COUNCIL Third Respondent AND DION BARETA (Removed) Fourth Respondent AND K ROAD NO 1 LIMITED Fifth Respondent AND STOANZ LIMITED (Removed) Sixth Respondent AND HANNA

2. [2023] NZREADT 32 UM v REAA (3 November 2023) [pdf, 298 KB]

   ...exercise of the Tribunal’s discretion as to the award of compensation. [83] The claim for compensation is dismissed. 21 Submissions of Mr Pasley on behalf of Mr Gow (15 September 2022) at [10.1]. 22 Ruling on Appellant’s Application to File Further Evidence and on Mode of Hearing (1 May 2023). 23 Complaints Assessment Committee 409 v Cartwright, above n 15. 24 At [50]–[51]. 17 Fine [84] The maximum fine is $10,000. The appellant seeks a fine of $10,000,...

3. [2017] NZEnvC 037 Wellington Fish Game Council v Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Council [pdf, 3.7 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND AND Decision [2017] NZEnvC 31- ENV-2016-WLG-000038 of an application for declarations under sections 310 and 311 of the Resource Management Act 1991 WELLINGTON FISH AND GAME COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE SOCIETY INC Applicants MANAWATU-WANGANUI REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge C J Thompson Environment Commissioner K A Edmonds Environment Commissioner J R Mills Hearing: at Wellington 13 -

4. [2019] NZEmpC 113 Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories Ltd v Scott [pdf, 576 KB]

   GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS LABORATORIES LIMITED v BRENDON SCOTT [2019] NZEmpC 113 [30 August 2019] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2019] NZEmpC 113 EMPC 274/2019 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for a stay of execution BETWEEN GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS LABORATORIES LIMITED

5. [2024] NZEnvC 115 Anderson Branch Creek Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 440 KB]

   ANDERSON BRANCH CREEK LIMITED v QLDC IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 115 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under s120 of the Act BETWEEN ANDERSON BRANCH CREEK LIMITED (ENV-2022-CHC-051) Appellant AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge K G Reid – sitting alone under s279 of the Act In Chambers at Christchurch Date of Consent Dete

6. Hinckley v Macduff LCRO 169 / 2009 (28 January 2010) [pdf, 158 KB]

   ...reflected in his email to her of 1 July 2009 in which he instructs her to “have the caveat lifted immediately”. In that email he also stated “when the caveat is lifted in the next two days please write up your account. I will pick up the file, all copies of the wills and power of attorney”. In a further email of 2 July 2009 JH claimed that the continued existence of the caveat had resulted in lost sales, and that Ms Macduff was acting in the interests of his brothers rather t...

7. LCRO 122/2015 NP v AO (21 May 2018) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...not named as beneficiaries. [3] The will came into effect when Ms T passed away in September 2014. By December 2014, although Mrs NP and her siblings had instructed a lawyer in Australia, no claims had been made against Ms T’s estate. Mr AO filed for probate and that was 2 granted by the High Court on 10 December 2014. He provided a copy of the will to Mrs NP. [4] Mrs NP objected to Mr AO’s involvement in drafting the will and taking steps as executor in the estate.

8. Mullen - Hongoeka 4A (2006) 176 Aotea MB 191 (176 AOT 191) [pdf, 3.5 MB]

   ...Mrs Williams also expressed the fear that the Mullens sought access for the purpose of, inter alia, opening their lands up for sale. [3] More impOltantly, Mrs Williams and the others in opposition have their own application for a roadway order filed in the name of Hongoeka Development Limited. She says that this company has been created to promote the development of a number of Hongoeka coastal blocks for the benefit of owners and their whfulau. The company's proposal involves,...

9. LCRO 64/2020 - QR - Application for review of a prosecutorial decision (7 September 2020) [pdf, 219 KB]

   ...in this instance, provided these documents to them.15 The documents provided are listed in the attachment to this decision. [52] Mr VT responded by way of a letter dated 31 August. He notes that the Committee considered a sample of Mr QR’s files but declined Mr QR the opportunity to address the Committee in person. He says that I am now in the same position as the Committee and that I am required to conduct a ‘substantive review’ of these files. He advises that Mr QR see...

10. Walters v Walters - Te Kohanga Lots 1 & 3 - 27 [2024] Chief Judge's MB 1357 (2024 CJ 1357) [pdf, 320 KB]

    ...October 2024 TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā KAIWHAKAWĀ MATUA FOX Judgment of Chief Judge C L Fox 2024 Taitokerau MB 1358 Hei tīmatanga kōrero Introduction [1] Katelyn Walters (‘the applicant’) filed this application pursuant to s 45 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993. The applicant seeks to amend vesting orders made at 24 Kaitaia MB 60 on 28 October 2005 and 24 Kaitaia MB 167-168 on 26 May 2006 whereby her grandfather Pita Muru W...