Search Results

1. Canterbury Westland Standards Committee v Withers [2013] NZLCDT 39 [pdf, 229 KB]

   ...failure to have Mr Adamowski’s evidence available. [25] The charges were laid and served in August 2012. The Tribunal indicated to Mr Withers in November 2012 that a substantive hearing might occur in late February 2013, and disclosure, defence filings, and any interlocutory filings were timetabled. 7 Mr Withers advised at that time that he was seeking further information to assist his defence and that he was actively considering steps he might take7. [26] After...

2. Gilvray v Rungarunga - Succession to Tamati Rungarunga [2023] Chief Judge's MB 551 (2023 CJ 551) [pdf, 319 KB]

   ...Report”) dated 31 September 2021 sets out the background to this application. The Report is reproduced in full as follows: APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 45 OF TE TURE WHENUA MĀORI ACT 1993 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Introduction 1. This application filed by Frigate Lani Gilvray and Lillian Callaghan, pursuant to section 45 Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993, seeks to amend a succession order to Tamati Rungarunga at 163 Taitokerau MB 285-296 dated 20 November 2017. 2. Frigate Lani...

3. Wallis & Anor as Trustees of The Seaview Trust v Wet-Seal NZ Ltd [pdf, 117 KB]

   ...and Mr. Spiekerman. 70. It was acknowledged that Wet-Seal actively became involved in the remedial work, removed the tiles, cleaned off the failed membrane and replaced it. No charge was made for this work but evidence was given that it took a file://JUSTWNNTS/VOL1/GROUPS/WHT%20WELLINGTON/Claims%202007/TRI-2007-101-14%20Seaview%20Trust%20-----%20CLOSED%20-----/search/runRemoteLink.do file://JUSTWNNTS/VOL1/GROUPS/WHT%20WELLINGTON/Claims%202007/TRI-2007-101-14%20Seaview%20Trust%20-----%20C...

4. CM v JD & Ors LCRO 006/2013 (10 March 2016) [pdf, 59 KB]

   ...from [Law Firm X] in this process is to take money they are not entitled to. This money is not interest payments coming from the mortgagor. The mortgagor defaulted in 2008 and has not paid since. If [Law Firm X] wish to take an interest collection fee, go chase the mortgagor and collect some. They have not done this in over 4 years. 8 My question to the standards committee, what does the property manager get paid?, is still unanswered. I had mentioned in my complaint that I fel...

5. [2018] NZEnvC 137 Haydan Investments Ltd v Auckland Council [pdf, 5.4 MB]

   ...to verify compliance (or non­ compliance) and documentation (site notes and photographs) of the activity established under the Resource Consent. In order to recover actual and reasonable costs, inspections, in excess of those covered by the base fee paid, shall be charged at the relevant hourly rate applicable at the time. The Consent Holder is advised that, pursuant to Section 126 of the RMA, which provides for Auckland Council to cancel a resource consent by written notice, if this...

6. Samuels v Matauri X Incorporation – Matauri X Incorporation (2009) 7 Taitokerau Appellate 216 (7 APWH 216) [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...hard fought or how realistic and reasonable a claim is. That said, as directed by the Supreme Court in the Austin Nichols case the Māori Appellate Court must come to its own view as to the merits of the appeal. [16] In this instance Mr Samuels filed in the lower Court an application which he knew to be highly contentious, and strongly resisted by the Incorporation, given that if the application was successful it would throw into disarray the Incorporation’s efforts to survive...

7. Polamalu - Te Ngāe Farm Trust (2007) 313 Rotorua MB 224 (313 ROT 224) [pdf, 456 KB]

   ...it did not mandate Nga Kaihautu at a lmi held 4 JWle 2006 This took almost three years of serious commitment of the Hapu's energies, and was clearly a major issue for Ngati Rangiteaorere. 6 As part of this dispute ]"1rs Pirihira Femvick filed proceedings in the High Court disputing Kaibautu's mandate. Ms Fenwick is of the Trustees of Te Ngae Farm an a long standing member of Ngati Rangiteaorere who has served the tribe in many capacities over a number of years, and is the...

8. Real Estate Agents Authority v Wallace [2016] NZREADT 71 [pdf, 118 KB]

   ...directions to do so. [15] Minute (4) further recorded that the first charge was to be withdrawn, and the second charge would proceed. The hearing of the second charge was set down for hearing on 12 October 2016, and directions were made as to filing evidence and submissions. A direction was also made that Ms Wallace’s lawyer enter an appearance on the record. [16] On 22 September 2016, the Tribunal received an email from Ms Wallace which appeared to be a request for the hear...

9. [2019] NZEmpC 75 Horizon Concepts Ltd v Hayward [pdf, 435 KB]

   ...Authority’s determination is set aside. [42] Costs are reserved. This case is assigned to Category 2, Band B, in the Court’s Practice Direction Guideline Scale.17 If an application for costs is to be made submissions are required to be filed and served within 20 working days. Submissions in response can be filed and served within a further 20 working days, and if any reply is necessary, within a further 10 working days. K G Smith Judge Ju...

10. [2020] NZIACDT 45 - TTD v Zheng (14 October 2020) [pdf, 216 KB]

    ...was being untruthful when he said he did not know that the complainant had resigned until she informed him on 1 February 2019. It had not therefore been established that Mr Zheng knew the leave letter of 7 December 2018 was false, at the time he filed it with Immigration New Zealand. 4 [17] The Tribunal, however, concluded that Mr Zheng had given a false explanation to Immigration New Zealand on 1 February 2019 when he said that the complainant had decided to study only when...