Search Results

1. Butler v NF Fraser Co Limited - Mangawhaiti 3B1 and Takahiwai 3 A2 [2013] Chief Judge's MB 59 (2013 CJ 59) [pdf, 1.9 MB]

   2013 Chief Judge's lVIB 59 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT Hearing: Judgment: Solicitors: A20050007087 CJ200S/47 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Mangawhati 3Bl & Takahiwai 3 A2 BETWEEN LEIGH BUTLER Applicant AND N F FRASER & CO LIMITED Affected Party 127 Whangarei MB 27 dated 9 September 2008 129 Whangarei MB 205-212 at 20 November 2008 136 Whangarei MB 88-200 dated 19 February 2009 137 Whangare

2. [2021] NZEmpC 186 Restaurant Brands Ltd v Gill [pdf, 349 KB]

   RESTAURANT BRANDS LIMITED v DILSHAAD GILL [2021] NZEmpC 186 [2 November 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZEmpC 186 EMPC 102/2021 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN RESTAURANT BRANDS LIMITED Plaintiff AND DILSHAAD GILL Defendant Hearing: 23 and 24 September 2021 (Heard at Wellingto

3. LD Trust v CN LCRO 300/2013 (29 November 2016) [pdf, 236 KB]

   ...that not all of those involved in governance of the Trust were of one mind about the way the Trust was operating. [42] There is also correspondence from the Board of Trustees referring to disagreements over the validity of documents. Mr CN’s fees were rejected as not having been sanctioned by the Board of Trustees, under Mr VH’s direction. In subsequent correspondence, mediation was proposed as a method of resolving issues around governance of the Trust and its assets. The...

4. Form1 Criminal legal aid application Crown Prosecution [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...legal aid for? Criminal charges Go to questions 21 to 25 below Parole proceedings Go to question 25 below Appeal Go to questions 27 and 28 on next page Criminal charges 21. What are you charged with? Charge filed date Offence type Number of charges Section and Act Maximum penalty Criminal Record Number (CRN) continue on a separate sheet if necessary . . . 22. How are you intending to plead...

5. Form 1 Crown Prosecution [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...legal aid for? Criminal charges Go to questions 21 to 25 below Parole proceedings Go to question 25 below Appeal Go to questions 27 and 28 on next page Criminal charges 21. What are you charged with? Charge filed date Offence type Number of charges Section and Act Maximum penalty Criminal Record Number (CRN) continue on a separate sheet if necessary … 22. How are you intending to plead?...

6. Otago Standards Committee v Duff [2021] NZLCDT 25 (2 September 2021) [pdf, 168 KB]

   ...have found misconduct, there is no need to consider the issue of unsatisfactory conduct.3 3 J v Auckland Standards Committee 1 [2019] NZCA 614. 14 Further Matters [65] We have carefully read the supporting affidavits that were filed by some of Mr Duff’s colleagues. These referred to Mr Duff’s positive qualities and said that Mr Duff has always properly accounted for his income as a lawyer and has not accepted under-the-table payments. We have no reason to dou...

7. National Standards Committee 1 v Palmer [2022] NZLCDT 42 (10 November 2022) [pdf, 128 KB]

   ...all maintained a determined effort to avoid over egging the evidence – all conceded that Mr Palmer may not have intended offence. They are to be commended for their careful evidence. 15 Directions 1. The Standards Committee is to file its submissions on penalty within 14 days of the date of this decision. 2. The respondent practitioner is to file his penalty submissions within a further 14 days thereafter. 3. The case manager is, in consultation with counsel and...

8. 2017 NZSSAA 074 (19 December 2017) [pdf, 120 KB]

   ...breathing difficulties which is consistent with that risk potential being more than remote in his case. [17] We can place very limited weight on the appellant’s evidence beyond these elements which are corroborated by the medical information on the file. We can give no weight to the Regional Disability Adviser’s evidence; she was unqualified to give evidence regarding the appellant’s medical situation and needs arising from it. It was clear to us that she relied heavily on h...

9. [2019] NZEnvC 037 Queenstown Airport Corporation Ltd [pdf, 157 KB]

   ...excessive given that the hearing lasted 1.5 days and no expert witnesses were briefed. QAC's representation by Queens Counsel and partner from an Auckland firm was "gold plated". As a check on the reasonableness of counsels ' fees , RPl applied the District Court scale to argue that 20% was a reasonable contribution in the circumstances. [15J As for QlDC, RPl submits that it would have expected the District Council to have remained neutral as to costs given that...

10. Rayner v CAC 521 & Morrow [2019] NZREADT 30 (31 July 2019) [pdf, 187 KB]

    ...in unsatisfactory conduct.1 [2] The Authority accepts that the Committee erred in making the finding of unsatisfactory conduct, and consents to the appeal being allowed. [3] Mr Morrow has not participated in the appeal proceeding, and has not filed any submissions in response to the appeal. Background [4] Mr Rayner is a licensed salesperson and was the listing agent for a property at Manurewa, Auckland, owned by Mr Morrow. [5] Mr Morrow complained to the Authority that Mr Ra...