Search Results

1. [2020] NZEmpC 165 Culturesafe NZ Ltd v Turuki Healthcare Services Charitable Trust [pdf, 294 KB]

   ...AND ALLAN HALSE Second Plaintiff AND TRACEY SIMPSON Third Plaintiff AND TURUKI HEALTHCARE SERVICES CHARITABLE TRUST Defendant Hearing: 2-4 June 2020 (Heard at Auckland) Additional submissions filed 15, 18 and 26 June 2020 Appearances: T Braun, counsel for first and second plaintiff T Simpson, third plaintiff in person A Drake, D J Pine and I Shores, counsel for defendant Judgment: 14 October 2020 JUDGM...

2. LCRO 109/2023 W and F JM v EB and MK [pdf, 221 KB]

   ...were unable to settle the sale of the [property] on the scheduled settlement date. [7] The applicants lodged an application for the caveat to lapse. [8] [Company B] lodged in Court an application to sustain the caveat. [9] The applicants filed a notice of opposition. [10] [Company B] withdrew the caveat. [11] The applicants were then able to settle the sale of the [property] on 8 July 2022. [12] The applicants incurred legal fees and expenses relating to the Court proce...

3. Kelly v Tall Poppies Education Limited [2024] NZHRRT 54 [pdf, 339 KB]

   (1) INTERIM ORDER PREVENTING PUBLICATION OF THE PLAINTIFF’S NAME ADDRESS AND ANY OTHER IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS. (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE TRIBUNAL OR OF THE CHAIRPERSON. DECISION OF TRIBUNAL1 1 This decision is to be cited as Kelly v Tall Poppies Education Limited [2024] NZHRRT 54. IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2024] NZHRRT 54 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA REFERENCE NO. HRRT 051/2022 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 199...

4. Rule 5.11 - Notification of applications outstanding as at 28 February 2017 [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   1 Notification of applications that have not been finally determined (over 6 months old) 28 February 2017 TAKE NOTICE THAT the following schedule of applications are hereby notified pursuant to rule 5.11(2)(b) of the Māori Land Court Rules 2011 being applications which are 6 months or older as at 28 February 2017, and which are currently held by the Registrar in the District set out, or, in the case of applications to the Chief Judge of Māori Land Court or those to the Mā

5. LS v MIS [2021] CEIT-2020-0024 [pdf, 387 KB]

   ...brief and under cross-examination, damage reports, and the records of the communications between LS, EQC, and MIS. These records involve letters, emails, and notes recording phone discussions. [41] The most significant record is the note (the file note) recording a discussion that occurred on 21 August 2015, between LS, and Q, an employee of MIS. MIS says that the file note records an unequivocal election by LS to not repair the property. [42] Mr Frith advises that MIS approached...

6. OIA-120297.pdf [pdf, 23 MB]

   ...approximately 2,320 by the end of June 2026. If there is a plan to take on more assignments how will this be achieved, for example are more staff to be employed, will supervised providers conduct more cases or will existing staff hold more active files. There will be changes to systems and processes to accommodate the increase in assignments. However, as mentioned above this will still be within our current 50% Cabinet settings. In some PDS locations, there will be an increase in...

7. [2015] NZEmpC 112 Vince Roberts Electrical v Carroll [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...pay for the period 16 May 2006 to 28 November 2011. The total award was $18,116.35. He was also awarded interest on that sum at the rate of five per cent per annum, from 28 November 2011 until payment. An order was made reimbursing him for his filing fee of $71.56. [4] On 11 December 2012, Vince Roberts Appliance Warehouse Limited filed a non-de novo challenge to the determination seeking a de novo hearing. The challenge related to only that part of the determination dealing w...

8. Ms C v CAC 10036 & Whitehorn [2012] NZREADT 53 [pdf, 47 KB]

   ...direction for publication is an “order in the nature of a penalty that could not have been made against [the licensee] at the time when the conduct occurred” – in terms of s.172(2) to which we refer further below. [6] We note that, somehow, this file was mislaid for a time in our Registry; and we apologise to the parties for the consequential delay. The 10 August 2011 Decision of the Complaints Assessment Committee 10036 [7] The Committee’s decision considered the issue...

9. avie v CAC 20002 & Goradia [2014] NZREADT 53 [pdf, 44 KB]

   ...it had deferred making a decision on publication. At that point the licensee was made aware of the possibility of publication. In the later penalty decision, the Committee stated that the Authority would publish the decision after the period for filing an appeal had ended unless an application for an order preventing publication had been made to us as part of the appeal. No application was made. [35] In any event, the licensee has provided no grounds which would have supported an a...

10. Auckland District Law Society v J [2010] NZLCDT 24 [pdf, 301 KB]

    ...threatening to cancel the contract and find another contractor. Mr J, the practitioner in this matter, was the solicitor acting for the developer and Mr R was the solicitor acting for the contractor. (Subsequently Mr D C, barrister, took over the file from Mr R or another intermediate barrister but this was much later into the dispute.) [6] On 10 January 2006 Mr R sent the following email to Mr J: “Enclosed for your attention an email forwarded to M C of your office. My clien...