7638 items matching your search terms
...providing: • it has been applied to the activity(s) relating to the ‘preparation’ of a matter – as opposed to hearings; • the guideline hours for the activity(s) relating to the ‘preparation’ of a matter, have been exceeded; and • the fees for the interpreter are claimed as a special disbursement.
...Minimum Formation Width (m) Minimum Legal Width Residential units 1-6 units 3.0 3.6 7-20 units (where access is to form common property under a unit title arrangement) 5.5 6.0 7-20 units (where access to vest as road as part of a fee simple subdivision) 6.0 16.0 More than 20 units (Local Road) 6.0 20.0 More than 20 units (Collector Road) 9.0 23.0 Residential centres, visitor accommodation 1-12 occupants 3.0 3.6 More than 12 occupants 5.5 - Car...
...greg.shaw@tetumupaeroa.co.nz Peter Bulfin, Halliwells Lawyers. DX NA 96004, Hawera. Taranaki preston.bulfin@halliwells.co.nz mailto:greg.shaw@tetumupaeroa.co.nz 329 Aotea MB 80 Introduction [1] This decision concerns a number of applications filed by the Māori Trustee on 4 February 2010 over Pukekohatu 7B. These applications are the latest in a series of proceedings commencing in 2003 where Judge Spencer secured broad agreement to the exclusive occupation of an area of...
...Waikato Maniapoto MB 168 Introduction [1] On 30 October 2003 Judge Milroy heard two applications concerning the Oparau No 1 Block (“the Oparau Block”) and the Pirongia West 12B3D Block (“the Pirongia Block”). The applications had been filed by the then trustees of the Oparau Block, a block of Māori freehold land. [2] In one application 1 the trustees sought to obtain a legal right of way across the Pirongia Block. At all relevant times the Pirongia Block was and rem...
...started with Property Brokers. [26] On 29 April 2013 Mr Fisher provided a report in which he concluded there were $6,708 of suspected expenses and $5,258 very likely not genuine. That would be a total loss to the company of $11,966. Affidavits Filed for Prosecution [27] A number of affidavits have been filed detailing the offending referred to in the above charge against the defendant. It is only necessary to refer to the detail contained in the affidavit of Mr Fisher who complete...
...revenue, which on a per vessel basis would be approximately $100,000. There is a risk of shipping lines reacting by seeking alternative ports. There is also a possibility of LPC not being able to obtain revenue from berthage and pilot and tug fees which would be difficult to charge if a vessel could not be worked. [58] For present purposes, I accept that the company faces potentially serious operational consequences and potential losses of profit. In this proceeding, LP...
...immigration adviser had primary responsibility for the client relationship. [83] The Code is prescriptive in requiring actions to occur at the commencement of the client engagement. As a minimum: [83.1] Before commencing work the basis for costs and fees must be established (clause 8). [83.2] A written agreement is required (clause 1.5). [83.3] Clients must be made aware of the terms and significant matters relating to that agreement (almost inevitably including their immigration opt...
...determining costs. Ms Lang has taken 1 Lang v Gourmet Foods Ltd [2018] NZERA Auckland 37. no active part in these proceedings; nor has Gourmet Foods Ltd. The Employment Relations Authority filed an appearance advising that it would abide the decision of the Employment Court (the Court), and did not wish to be heard. In these circumstances, counsel (Ms Catran) was appointed to assist the Court. I am grateful for her subm...
...APPEARANCES Mr H Keyte QC and Mr M Treleaven for New Zealand Law Society Respondent Mr Dorbu in Person DECISION OF NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS TRIBUNAL Introduction [1] The practitioner faces 12 charges which fall into three groups, filed at two different times. Charges 1 to 10 were laid in September 2008. Charges 11 and 12 were laid in October 2009. All charges were denied by the practitioner although in the course of the hearing, charges 11 and 12 were imp...
...[Ms PH gave] the additional documents … to Mr GB”. Although “Mr GB’s manner when dealing with Ms TC and Mr CS may have been abrupt, that of itself does not amount to unsatisfactory conduct” by Mr GB. Application for review [24] Ms TC filed an application for review on behalf of Mr CS on 15 August 2017. She states that she and Mr CS were “both very shocked” by the Committee’s decision. She considers that “most of her concerns have not been addressed”. Lette...