Canterbury Westland Standards Committee 2 v Mr U [2024] NZLCDT 4 (9 February 2024) [pdf, 173 KB]
...care of the children, his former wife was receiving the solo parent’s benefit. [8] Mr U reached the view that he was the victim of bias within the system. On 19 November 2021, this frustration bubbled over into an appalling memorandum that he filed with the Family Court (and of course served on the representatives for his former 4 wife). In that memorandum Mr U referred to the Family Court as a “rotten jurisdiction” and the Family Court bench as “disgracefully ine...