Search Results

1. Tahata v Tahata- Ngāwhakatutu A1A Incorporation (2014) 37 Tairawhiti MB 217 (37 TRW 217) [pdf, 283 KB]

   ...Gordon Kaiwai was a major part of my time, energy and determination for five long ears to bring Gordon to account for what he did. This culminated in his conviction without cost to Proprietors of Ngāwhakatutu A1A & Other Blocks Inc for legal fees, which we could not afford by utilizing the NZ Police. Unfortunately ‘fraud’ as we see so many instances in NZ is devastating to shareholders and Whānau, detection can be difficult and the ‘unknown’ prior to detection is also...

2. Langdon v ACC [2014] NZACA 9 [pdf, 71 KB]

   ...alternative accommodation while on shore. ACC was therefore unable to determine the value of any of the allowances and they could not be included in Mr Langdon’s relevant earnings. [7] The right of appeal was given to the District Court and Mr Langdon filed a number of interconnected appeals in the District Court in 2006 and 2007. In November 2007, as part of a general administrative review of the appeals when Mr Langdon had legal representation, some appeals were withdrawn, some we...

3. Apatu v Trustees of Owhaoko C Trust - Owhaoko C 1 and C 2 [2010] 2010 Maori Appellate Court MB 34 (2010 APPEAL 34) [pdf, 116 KB]

   ...situated at the headwaters of 2010 Maori Appellate Court MB 35 the Ngaruroro River, south of Taupo and east of Taihape. The appellant Mr Ashley Apatu is an owner in two of those blocks being Owhaoko C1 and C2. [2] On 15 May 2008 Mr Apatu filed an injunction application with the Māori Land Court seeking to restrain the respondents in a number of ways. On 18 July 2008 Mr Apatu together with another beneficial owner Mr Rangi Karaitiana filed an application seeking: an injun...

4. [2018] NZEmpC 83 Kaikorai Service Centre Ltd v First Union Inc [pdf, 904 KB]

   ...full from the Authority AND IN THE MATTER of a challenge to objection to disclosure AND BETWEEN KAIKORAI SERVICE CENTRE LIMITED Plaintiff AND FIRST UNION INCORPORATED Defendant Hearing: On the papers filed 20 & 25 June 2018 Appearances: T Oldfield, counsel for the plaintiff P Cranney, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 23 July 2018 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE K G SMITH DISCLOSURE...

5. LCRO 34/2018 GR v [Area] Standards Committee [X] [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...mistake based on information received from third parties (as he recalled he thought he had discussions about the matter with LINZ staff and, possibly, the surveyor); (e) He did not wilfully mislead anyone. Application for review [35] Mr GR filed an application for review on 27 February 2018. The outcome principally sought is reversal of the Standards Committee determination. [36] Mr GR provided his grounds for review the following day, on 28 February 2018. They are that: (a)...

6. Body Corporate 81738 v Wellington City Council [2010] NZWHT Wellington 15 [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...application under the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 was made on 3 December 2002. [3] Some evidence was heard in those proceedings, particularly from Mr Blundell before they were abandoned with the new applications being filed with this Tribunal between 1 August 2008 and 24 September 2008 under the WHRS Act 2006. [4] Both buildings leaked. The claimants proceeded to have repairs carried out to the two blocks. Tenders were sought and the remediation wa...

7. Deputy Registrar - Succession to Irihapeti Toria (2024) 88 Te Waipounamu MB 271 (88 TWP 271) [pdf, 425 KB]

   ...certificate was located from the Christchurch Archives, which recorded her adoptive mother as Mary Ann Russell (likely an alternative name for Merehana). The birth certificate was registered in 1984. The Christchurch Archives noted that their adoption files only reach back to 1963, and their adoption registers back to 1964. Older files are held in commercial storage by the Family Court. [20] As a result of this information, on 6 April 2023, I made an application to the Family Cou...

8. LCRO 88/2022 GX v EJ (2 April 2024) [pdf, 236 KB]

   ...adverse finding against Mr EJ. Information not provided to Ms GX as a client/trustee [109] Mr EJ did not act for Ms GX in her personal capacity. He acted for the Trust. [110] Ms GX complains that Mr EJ would not release copies of the Trust files relating to the retirement of Mr PE as a trustee, the appointment of herself as a trustee, and the addition of Mr OM as a beneficiary. She says that Mr EJ would not release these without the consent of Mr OM, notwithstanding that Mr OM’...

9. Chalecki v Accident Compensation Corporation [2015] NZACA 12 [pdf, 282 KB]

   ...being debt free to having a $20,000 loan from a bank and owing his parents $10,000. He also had a lot of ongoing costs associated with the farming venture which would not have been incurred if he had been 100 per cent physically able. [24] A file note from a rehabilitation officer dated 3 May 1993 stated that Mr Chalecki had been informed on 15 May 1992 that a grant in the region of $5,000 would be considered on receipt of “quotes and evidence of increased independence”. A...

10. ARC76/06 AC-37/07 Yong v Chin [pdf, 92 KB]

    ...Hearing: 18 and 20 April 2007 and 7 May 2007 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: Evgeny Orlov, Counsel for Plaintiff Mark Nutsford, Advocate for Defendant Judgment: 20 June 2007 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE ME PERKINS Introduction [1] Mr Yong has filed a challenge against the determination of the Employment Relations Authority at Auckland dated 4 October 2006. Under the determination Mr Yong was ordered to pay his former employee, Ms Chin, the following: a. Reimbursement of th...