Search Results

1. 2021-07-23 ORC - Legal submissions regarding scope for relief sought by WISE Response.pdf [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...WX11179 Tel +64 3 379 7622 Fax +64 379 2467 Solicitor: P A C Maw / M A Mehlhopt (philip.maw@wynnwilliams.co.nz / michelle.mehlhopt@wynnwilliams.co.nz) 1 MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT: Introduction 1 These legal submissions are filed on behalf of the Otago Regional Council (Council or ORC) in relation to Plan Change 8 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (PC8). 2 At the pre-hearing conference on 14 July 2021, the Court directed the Council to file legal submi...

2. [2025] NZEmpC 90 Youtap Ltd v Johnston [pdf, 244 KB]

   ...the personal grievance, and it is just to do so. [65] Section 103B only comes into play, however, where there is an unresolved personal grievance between the employee and their employer before the Authority or Court.22 As Dr Johnston has not filed any claim against YMMA in the Authority, there is no basis for either YMMA or Dr Johnston to apply to join Youtap Ltd as a controlling third party. [66] It is, therefore, premature, and not within the Court’s jurisdiction to conside...

3. B v Southern Response Earthquake Services Ltd [2021] CEIT-2021-0006 [pdf, 336 KB]

   ...separately as set out at 7. 6. The policyholder and Southern Response agree that the proceeding will not be discontinued at this stage, but: a. the joint experts' report following the conferral on 18 November 2015 is to be completed and filed by Friday 4 December 2015; b. the policyholder and Southern Response will file a Joint Memorandum of Counsel to seek a stay of the proceeding to 7 May 2016 to allow the steps set out at 7 to be completed; and c. the policyholder will f...

4. Legal Services Agency closure & annual report 2011 [pdf, 976 KB]

   E7 CLOSURE REPORT and final Annual Report for the 12 months ended 30 June 2011 HELPING PEOPLE ACCESS JUSTICE C O N T E N T S 1 E7 Introduction Letter to the Minister ................................................................................................................................ 2   From the Chair ......................................................................................................................................... 3

5. Rule 5.11 - Notification of applications outstanding as at 30 November 2016 [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   1 Notification of applications that have not been finally determined (over 6 months old) 30 November 2016 TAKE NOTICE THAT the following schedule of applications are hereby notified pursuant to rule 5.11(2)(b) of the Māori Land Court Rules 2011 being applications which are 6 months or older as at 30 November 2016, and which are currently held by the Registrar in the District set out, or, in the case of applications to the Chief Judge of Māori Land Court or those to the Mā

6. Naera v Fenwick - Whakapoungakau 24 Block (2011) 34 Waiariki MB 151 (34 WAR 151) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...directions [41] Fulfilment of trustees’ duties [44] Applicants seeking to re-litigate substantive judgment [46] Tests for injunction not met [48] Risks to the trust if orders granted [52] Post hearing events [56] Filing of further evidence [56] Applicant’s additional submissions [59] Respondent’s further submissions [63] The Appeal [65] The Law [69] Discussion [72] Risk to the trust’s assets...

7. Pickering - Waima D8 [2018] Chief Judge's MB 820 (2018 CJ 820) [pdf, 710 KB]

   ...being displaced from their rightful inheritance. Background [4] There have been two Reports of the Registrar that review this matter. The first concerned an application that was later dismissed but with advice that a new application could be filed. That first Report is set out in full below. APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 45 OF TE TURE WHENUA MĀORI ACT 1993 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Introduction 1. This application filed by Paki Wharerau originally was made pursuant to sec...

8. Paterson v Whangarei District Council [2012] NZWHT Auckland 18 [pdf, 168 KB]

   ...allowed for generous margins. It was not based on what was found when the house was deconstructed. Mr Light estimated a total remedial cost of $149,420.00 GST inclusive. He estimated a betterment figure of $166,580.00 and stated that expert fees were excessive to the extent of $10,390.33. [30] We believe that there needs to be some further deduction for betterment from the total amount claimed but not to the extent indicated by Mr Light in his written evidence. However beca...

9. SK and RM v GJ LCRO 36/2015 (14 December 2016) [pdf, 252 KB]

   ...the lawyers, was:18 16 See affidavit of HY at [17]–[18]. 17 At [25]. 18 Letter from TP to GJ (19 June 2013). 11 … we had assumed that you refunded the monies after deducting our fees, but today we have received a further fax which indicates that the solicitors acting for the estates are still requesting the refund of the monies. As indicated previously, I do not see that there is any other avenue to question the estate...

10. Justice Sector Outlook December 2016 [pdf, 758 KB]

    Justice Sector Outlook December 2016 quarter Contents Summary of the December quarter 1 Environmental factors are mixed 2 Emerging risks of upwards pipeline pressures 3 Criminal justice pipeline 4 Police proceedings have risen 5 Court volumes are rising, especially serious cases 6 Crown Law case volumes will rise slowly 7 Legal aid expenditure is projected to rise 8 Court-imposed fines are down slightly 10 Numbers of community sentences will rise s