Search Results

1. LCRO 160/2017 EH v FP (23 April 2018) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...and questions the validity of decisions made by the trustees” including “the validity of their appointments” the proper course for Mr EH “is an application to the courts”. Application for review [26] In his application for review filed on [date], Mr EH seeks: (a) an admission from Mr FP that [Mr FP] “misrepresented himself as a legal trustee”; and (b) recusal by Mr FP from any further involvement with the trust without “waiv[ing] the right of any of the benef...

2. Gisborne District Council v Hautapu – Tātarahake No 1 (2013) 27 Tairawhiti MB 295 (27 TRW 295) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...by the trustees.3 The reservation is administered by trustees, namely Nanette Christine Kernohan, Nicholas Curtis and Te Ra Tautau.4 Application [4] The Court has before it an application under s 315 and 338(5) of the Act. The application was filed on behalf of the Gisborne District Council (“Council”) on 23 December 2010. 1 89 Waiapu MB 314 (89 WP 314). 2 187 Gisborne MB 262 (187 GIS 262). 3 NZ Gazette (15/10/2009) No 152, p...

3. INZ (Calder) v Horan [2019] NZIACDT 13 (11 March 2019) [pdf, 274 KB]

   ...they had the same satisfaction and whether they could sleep soundly at night. Mr Horan sent his best regards to all, except “for those whose agenda has created a ‘travesty of injustice based on their own incompetence’”. [27] The Authority filed a statement of complaint (dated 9 May 2017) with the Tribunal, together with supporting documents. It alleges Mr Horan breached the Code in the following respects: (1) Expressed criticisms of Immigration New Zealand and its staff in...

4. INZ (Foley) v De'Ath [2018] NZIACDT 44 (6 November 2018) [pdf, 273 KB]

   ...or discourage me from future complaints / reviews, then the problems within the culture of civil servants who seek not to be accountable for their actions and roles, are likely much deeper than I first realized. [30] The Registrar of the Authority filed a statement of complaint with the Tribunal on 10 January 2018. [31] The Registrar contends that Mr De’Ath has breached cl 1 of the Code obligation to be professional and respectful, in the following manner: (1) Submitted OIA reques...

5. Bevan v Peakman - Succession to Kathleen Paikea and Hemi Wharepaikea [2024] Chief Judge's MB 212 (2024 CJ 212) [pdf, 360 KB]

   ...Whakataunga: Judgment date 6 March, 2024 TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā KAIWHAKAWĀ MATUA C L FOX Judgment of Chief Judge C L Fox 2024 Chief Judge's MB 213 Hei timatanga kōrero Introduction [1] This application was filed by Katrina Miriama Bevan (“the applicant”) who seeks an order to amend two succession orders made at 69 Waikato Maniapoto MB 240-243 on 5 December 2013 relating to the estate of both Kathleen Paikea and Hemi Wharepaikea also known a...

6. Māori Land Court - Rule 5.11 Schedule - February 2018 [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   1 Notification of applications that have not been finally determined (over 6 months old) 28 February 2018 TAKE NOTICE THAT the following schedule of applications are hereby notified pursuant to rule 5.11(2)(b) of the Māori Land Court Rules 2011 being applications which are 6 months or older as at 28 February 2018, and which are currently held by the Registrar in the District set out, or, in the case of applications to the Chief Judge of Māori Land Court or those to the Mā

7. Notification of Applications that have not been finally determined (over 6 months old) - 30 November 2018 [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   1 Notification of applications that have not been finally determined (over 6 months old) 30 November 2018 TAKE NOTICE THAT the following schedule of applications are hereby notified pursuant to rule 5.11(2)(b) of the Māori Land Court Rules 2011 being applications which are 6 months or older as at 30 November 2018, and which are currently held by the Registrar in the District set out, or, in the case of applications to the Chief Judge of Māori Land Court or those to the Mā

8. Kendal v Sherbourne LCRO 69 / 2009 (19 August 2009) [pdf, 57 KB]

   ...evidence both by affidavit and orally. Ms Kendal was unable to attend and a letter from her was provided to me. At the conclusion of the hearing I issued a minute granting leave for an affidavit of Ms Kendal confirming the contents of that letter to be filed within five working days. I also indicated that the files held by Ms Sherbourne in respect of the transactions (which she had offered to supply) should be provided to me. I have received those files and had an opportunity to exami...

9. CAC304 v Drever [2016] NZREADT 27 [pdf, 163 KB]

   ...for the Tribunal to consider the facts in order to judge whether or not there is any similarity in the evidence between each of the diverse particulars to see if they suggest a common course of conduct. The Tribunal has the statements of evidence filed by the Complaints Assessment Committee. The first complaint by Mr and Mrs Deyermond arises out of a sale in early 2013. The allegations made by the complainants are around Mr Drever’s conduct in managing the sale process and alleged fa...

10. SW v RD LCRO 2/2012 (24 September 2015) [pdf, 62 KB]

    ...unsuccessful, and it is appropriate that he contribute to the costs of this review, which are otherwise defrayed across all New Zealand lawyers. A review hearing was convened to consider Mr SW’s application for review. The Guidelines say the standard fee for a hearing in person is $1,200. It is appropriate that Mr SW pay that amount pursuant to s 210 of the Act. Orders [50] Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the Committee’s decision is modified...