Search Results

1. [2015] NZEmpC 24 Lowe v Director-General of Health, Ministry of Health & Ors [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...conference to discuss this issue; it will be scheduled for a convenient date two months hereafter. [61] We also reserve questions as to costs; we anticipate the parties will be able to resolve this issue directly, but if not, the plaintiff may file a memorandum and evidence within 28 days after the delivery of this judgment. The first and second defendants may file memoranda and evidence (if any) 28 days thereafter. In accordance with the usual practice, the intervener sho...

2. Wallace v CAC 20006 & Baker [2014] NZREADT 75 [pdf, 72 KB]

   ...refused to settle the purchase. [7] The complainants' maintained that the wardrobes did not form part of the sale. Ultimately, the complainants returned the wardrobes and settlement was completed. [8] However, the complainants subsequently filed a complaint to the Real Estate Agents Authority alleging the following: [a] First, that the licensees had failed to disclose to the purchasers of the property that three free-standing BoConcept wardrobes in the house were not include...

3. BW v DJ LCRO 9 / 2013 (20 September 2013) [pdf, 117 KB]

   ...Committee: 11 a. Should not have taken into account DJ’s submission that BW intentionally failed to disclose the existence of the guarantees; and b. Should have given particular attention to the secrecy surrounding the existence of BW’s file, which DJ says she did not disclose to her employer, at BW’s request; a contention that BW denies. [51] Both of those submissions would require the Committee to make findings on the parties’ intentions. Although those submissions...

4. AML/CFT Statutory Review - summary of form submissions [pdf, 820 KB]

   ...other activities 47 If you answered 'yes', how could we best do this to avoid any obligations being duplicated for the same activity? Please share your comments below. 47 Question 2.8: Should we clarify what is meant by 'professional fees'? 47 Clarify what is meant by professional fees 47 If you answered 'yes', what would be an appropriate definition? Please share your comments below. 47 Question 2.9: Should the fees of a third party be included within the s...

5. Tangi v ACC [2012] NZACA 4 [pdf, 119 KB]

   [2012] NZACA 4 (ACA 004/09) IN THE MATTER of the Accident Compensation Act 1982 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal pursuant to s 107 of the Act BETWEEN TANIELA TANGI of Auckland Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION a body corporate duly constituted under the provisions of the said Act Respondent BEFORE THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION APPEAL AUTHORITY R Bedford HEARING at Auckland on 9 December 2011 APPEARANCES/COUNSEL Mr H

6. [2022] NZEnvC 140 Cornelius v Western Bay of Plenty District Council [pdf, 419 KB]

   ...128(1)(a)(i) of the Resource Management Act 1991 if the need and requirements for on-going car parking monitoring cannot be agreed. Engineering Design Documents 48. THAT the consent holder shall submit, with the appropriate engineering inspection fee; construction drawings, specifications, and calculations; the following works: 12 MHH-427121-233-638-3:jh a. The signage required on the road and within the car parking and access ways on site. b. The construction of the vehi...

7. Ministry of Justice Statement of Intent 2023 - 2027 [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   ...widespread use of digital technology. Increased use of audio-visual technology was rolled out in multiple courts, providing opportunities for virtual delivery of court events, where appropriate. A new service was created to enable participants to file documents and pay court fees electronically. Technology also provides enhanced engagement channels with communities. Continued community engagement also brings increased expectations of not just being consulted with on potential government...

8. Human Rights Act 1993

   A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z A Access to Tribunal file – application by plaintiff for return of certain documents – allegation by plaintiff of theft and destruction of documents – importance of maintaining Tribunal’s file intact – Public Records Act 2005, ss 17 and 18 Mullane v Attorney-Ge...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Human rights >
   3. Decisions - Index

9. H Trust v Southern Response Earthquake Services Ltd [2019] CEIT-2019-0011 [pdf, 997 KB]

   IN THE CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL CEI-00XX-2019 IN THE MATTER OF CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL ACT 2019 BETWEEN H & H and DB as trustees of the H TRUST Applicant AND SR Respondent Date: 10, 31 October, 14 November, 10, 11, 20 December 2019 Appearances: B for Applicant F and S for Respondent __________________________________________________________________________

10. Mota v Accident Compensation Corporation (Deemed cover decision) [2025] NZACC 47 (20 March 2025) [pdf, 342 KB]

    ...to revoke deemed cover on the basis that the evidence did not establish that the epicondylitis was caused by the PIBA. [56] The Reviewer also awarded costs across the various reviews. The reviewer declined costs in relation to Mr Burger's fees. [57] On 15 October 2024, an appeal was filed against the Reviewer's decisions. Mr Forster requested that the appeal be progressed expeditiously, noting his view that there were no evidential issues, only questions of law, regardin...