Search Results

1. Ringwood v Auckland Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 44 [pdf, 170 KB]

   ...damages should be followed in this case and general damages are set at $25,000. [87] Consequential losses are claimed in the sum of $30,329.85. These represent the costs of temporary rental accommodation, storage and moving costs, valuation fees, insurance and expert‟s fees. Invoices to support these claims were produced. No challenge was made to the sum claimed. It is accepted that this claim is made out. Conclusion as to Quantum [88] The claim has been es...

2. Nixon v Attorney-General [2018] NZHRRT 9 [pdf, 301 KB]

   ...Revenue apportions this tax credit equally between them. [25] Mr Nixon has experienced financial hardship arising from the costs associated with maintaining himself and his daughter as well as paying his half share of expenses such as school fees and tuition fees. He has had to be creative in managing these financial 6 challenges. For example, he spends food money on tuition and then seeks an emergency grant for food. He also uses food banks and receives food parcels. At the...

3. Complaints Assessment Committee 408 v Reed [2017] NZREADT 6 [pdf, 226 KB]

   ...Memorandum” booklet (“PIM”) for a property sold by him. They did not recall receiving three PIMs as Mr Reed asserted. They said Mr Reed also gave them a marketing proposal for the Property, and a document headed “Bayleys Schedule of Fees”. [33] Mr Reed’s evidence was that he also gave the Whittys a single-page document headed “Bayleys Comparative Market Sales Appraisal” (“the Bayleys appraisal form”). This document contains a section headed “Details of com...

4. [2020] NZREADT 42 - Stone v The Real Estate Agents Authority (14 September 2020) [pdf, 356 KB]

   ...was employed by the TAFE Institute as Head Tutor. Ms Lim had by then enrolled at TAFE as well. She became involved in a dispute with TAFE arising out of her allegation that TAFE and a Ms Ngaere Johns had failed to account for a $300 enrolment fee which Ms Lim had paid and further alleged that some of the course materials to which she was entitled had not been provided. She also raised the alleged conduct of the complainant while at the Open Polytechnic. She said Mr Stone had sexual...

5. The Trustees of the Tauwhao Te Ngare Trust v Shaw - Tauwhao Te Ngare Block and a preliminary decision of the Chief Judge at 2013 CJ 567 [2014] Māori Appellate Court MB 394 (2014 APPEAL 394) [pdf, 377 KB]

   ...roadway order. In 2004 Mr Shaw applied to the Court for an order under s 18(1)(a) of the 1993 Act declaring that he has an interest in the block over which the roadway lies, which would entitle him to access the wharf. Appeals and cross appeals were filed in respect of Judge Milroy’s decision on that application. 10 They have been adjourned sine die pending the outcome of the trustees’ application pursuant to s 45 to cancel the 1976 roadway order. The s 45 application was file...

6. MLC - 11 Rule 5-11 schedule notification [pdf, 969 KB]

   1 Notification of applications that have not been finally determined (over 6 months old) 30 November 2015 TAKE NOTICE THAT the following schedule of applications are hereby notified pursuant to rule 5.11(2)(b) of the Māori Land Court Rules 2011 being applications which are 6 months or older as at 30 November 2015, and which are currently held by the Registrar in the District set out, or, in the case of applications to the Chief Judge of Māori Land Court or those to the Mā

7. D (D G Family Trust) v IAG New Zealand Ltd [2019] CEIT-2019-0037 [pdf, 605 KB]

   ...warning that this Tribunal will award costs if it thinks that one party’s conduct has caused one or more of the other parties to incur unnecessary costs and expenses. Background [2] At the end of my decision dated 22 December 2020, I invited the filing of applications for costs from any party considering themselves entitled to such an award. [3] The applicant (the Family Trust) has sought costs against the first respondent (IAG) and the second and third respondents (Max Cont...

8. [2021] NZEnvC 165 Poutama Kaitiaki Charitable Trust v Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Toanga [pdf, 554 KB]

   Poutama Kaitiaki Charitable Trust v Heritage NZ IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2021] NZEnvC 165 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 58 of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 BETWEEN POUTAMA KAITIAKI CHARITABLE TRUST (ENV-2020-AKL-158) Appellant AND HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND POUHERE TAONGA Respondent AND FIRST GAS LIMITED Section 274 Party Court: Environment Judge MJL Dickey Māori Land

9. [2021] NZEnvC 165 Poutama Kaitiaki Charitable Trust v Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Toanga [pdf, 554 KB]

   Poutama Kaitiaki Charitable Trust v Heritage NZ IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2021] NZEnvC 165 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 58 of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 BETWEEN POUTAMA KAITIAKI CHARITABLE TRUST (ENV-2020-AKL-158) Appellant AND HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND POUHERE TAONGA Respondent AND FIRST GAS LIMITED Section 274 Party Court: Environment Judge MJL Dickey Māori Land

10. Rogers v Stirling - Taungaure No.2 (2010) 21 Waiariki 205 (21 WAR 205) [pdf, 205 KB]

    ...1993 for the partition of this block into two parcels being Taungaure 1 Section 1 and Taungaure 1 Section 2 blocks as defined on the sketch plan filed with the application. The application for a change in status was dismissed by consent. The fee will waive if applicant brings it back within one year. Taungaure 1 Section 2 block – A20070003922 As a result a further application was filed by Robert John Scullin on 26 March 2007 to Change the Status of Taungaure 1 Section 2 block...