Search Results

1. LCRO 50/2020 M and N PQ v WR (23 April 2021) [pdf, 276 KB]

   ...consequence of the residual problems arising from the initial spraying. [10] Mr WR was instructed to represent Mr and Mrs PQ’s company. [Company A] issued proceedings against Mr SF and his company, and Mr BL and his company. [11] In the proceedings filed, the Plaintiff sought: (a) In respect to all defendants, damages for loss suffered as a consequence of the spraying causing the loss of the trees planted in 2012; and (b) damages from Mr SF and his company for loss suffered as a...

2. LCRO 001/2017 AB v AC [pdf, 253 KB]

   ...prohibits a lawyer from engaging in misleading or deceptive conduct “on any aspect of the lawyer’s practice” did not apply. 2 At [8]–[13]. 5 Application for review [17] Mr AB filed an application for review on 4 January 2017. He seeks: (a) a written apology from Mr AC to Mrs AB; (b) payment of $5,000 by Mr AC to a charity nominated by Mr and Mrs AB; and (c) attendance by Mr AC “(physically, not online) [at]...

3. Godinich v Guan Thye Heng Co Ltd [pdf, 97 KB]

   CLAIM FILE NO: 00036 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER OF an adjudication BETWEEN FRANCO GODINICH and SUSAN MARIE GODINICH Claimants AND GUAN THYE HENG CO LTD First Respondent AND APPROVED BUILDING CERTIFIERS LTD Second Respondent DETERMINATION OF ADJUDICATOR (Dated 6 October 2003) 1. BACKGROUND 1.1 The Claimants lodged a claim under the Weathertight Homes Reso...

4. IAA v Maerean [2013] NZIACDT 6 (07 February 2013) [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...Mr Sparks’ affidavit – earlier statements [52] Mr Sparks commented on his statements made to the Authority’s investigator. [53] He said the first telephone call was on 25 January 2011, and it was unexpected. He had not had time to check his file and answered as best he could. Further, he challenges the accuracy of the record in relation to meeting Mr OBC. Mr Sparks believes he said he could have met him, and he certainly did not intend to mislead the Authority. [54] His estimate...

5. 2021-04-07 - ORC - legal submissions - scope [pdf, 266 KB]

   ..."about" as "on the subject of, or connected with". 10 The Merriam­ Webster Dictionary defines "about" as "with regard to; concerned with; 5 6 7 8 9 10 RMA, s 149E(3). See Form 5 in the Resource Management (Forms, Fees, and Procedure) Regulations 2003. RMA, s 149E(1). RMA, Sch 1, cl 6(1 ). RMA, s 49(1). Cambridge Dictionary "About" <https://dictionary.cambridge.org/diclionary/english/about>. 3 fundamentally conc...

6. [2025] NZLVT 019 – Flath v Minister for Land Information (9 May 2025) [pdf, 505 KB]

   ...questions of costs. Costs claims The Minister (/the Crown) has made a claim for payment in the sum of $105,000 (plus GST, if any). At the Land Valuation Tribunal stage, the Minister incurred costs as follows: (a) $234,349.55 (excluding GST) legal fees; and (b) $164,985.00 (excluding GST) for expert disbursements. The Minister notes that the amount sought is less than two thirds of its total expert costs, and approximately only one quarter of the Crown’s total costs. Th...

7. Notification of Applications Over 6 months old that have not been finally determined (over 6 months old) - 28 February 2019 [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   1 Notification of applications that have not been finally determined (over 6 months old) 28 February 2019 TAKE NOTICE THAT the following schedule of applications are hereby notified pursuant to rule 5.11(2)(b) of the Māori Land Court Rules 2011 being applications which are 6 months or older as at 28 February 2019, and which are currently held by the Registrar in the District set out, or, in the case of applications to the Chief Judge of Māori Land Court or those to the Mā

8. Waitangi Tribunal - Part 5 Te Urewera [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   T E U R E W E R A P A R T V Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz W A I T A N G I T R I B U N A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 4 W A I 894 T E U R E W E R A P r e - p u b l i c a t i o n P a r t V Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Down

9. Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Fendall [2018] NZLCDT 26 [pdf, 349 KB]

   ...5 [15] In addition, she gave evidence that she had made a number of appearances for long standing Youth Court clients for which she did not charge, but which she did not declare to the insurer. [16] Further false declarations were filed in October 2012, November 2012, December 2012, January 2013, February 2013, May 2013, August 2013, October 2013 and November 2013. [17] In November 2013 Sovereign engaged a private investigator to carry out surveillance of Ms Fendall

10. ENV-2016-AKL-000277 Auckland Transport v KiwiRail Holdings Limited [pdf, 11 MB]

    ...Notice of AppeaL AT _ KiwiRaii Holdings - 28631964 v 1.DOC Page4 (e) KiwiRail's decision; and (f) a list of names and addresses of persons who have been served with a copy of this notice of appeal. Date: 29 November 2016 This document is filed by Gerald Christopher Lanning solicitor for the firm Simpson Grierson. The address for service of the Appellant is at the offices of Simpson G 88 Shortland Street, Auckland . Documents for service on the Appellant may be left at tha...