Saul v Ramos [2014] NZIACDT 48 (09 April 2014) [pdf, 130 KB]
...prepare a new or amended written agreement to deal with the applications following the complainant’s visa expiring, and the original agreement did not cover that work. The adviser admits she should have done so. [7] The adviser also admits she took fees of $2,000 from a fund deposited with her by the complainant for tuition fees, and accepts that was wrong. She has since repaid the money. [8] The Tribunal has to determine whether the adviser gave unsatisfactory advice, and whether the...