Search Results

1. [2021] NZEnvC 120 Brookby Quarries Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 2.8 MB]

   ...preparation for the hearing, from counsels' detailed schedules of matters agreed and matters disagreed, attached to the joint memorandum. At the request of the Court the parties also provided a schedule of parts of statements of evidence already filed that would not need to be pre-read on account of the narrowing of issues. The hearing [20] The hearing proceeded over two days, with the parties offering opening submissions and all witnesses except one being cross-examined. P...

2. [2024] NZEmpC 248 Secretary for Education v Public Service Association [pdf, 456 KB]

   ...[3] The parties dispute the way in which the terms of the current collective agreement apply to those change processes. The parties’ dispute was the subject of an Employment Relations Authority determination.2 [4] The Secretary has filed a non-de novo challenge to that determination. There are two key issues: (a) whether cl 11.15.1 of the current collective agreement requires the parties to reach agreement on the options that are appropriate to the circumstances and...

3. CAC 20006 v Azimi [2014] NZREADT 69 [pdf, 120 KB]

   ...to the applicant i.e. the mortgagor. It is alleged that the syndicate profits, because the initial loan advanced (and probably subsequent loans) is higher than the true value of the property. Presumably, the mortgagor either flits New Zealand or files in bankruptcy. It is not clear to us why the lending Bank does not realise from a valuation of the property that its loan is quite excessive in relation to the value of the security. [13] This overall pattern is explained by Lisa Kerr...

4. Taueki v McMillan - Horowhenua 11 (Lake) (2014) 324 Aotea MB 144 (324 AOT 144) [pdf, 311 KB]

   ...resources for the hapū of Muaūpoko. Another ground for opposition was the claim that neither the applicant nor those supporting her had a mandate from the iwi to pursue the application. [3] A number of additional applications have also been filed, by various parties, regarding Horowhenua 11 (Lake) block over at least the last decade. Those applications largely concerned the administration of the land and the trust created for the management of a fishing easement and the owner...

5. Corrigan - Ngatihine H2B (2014) 71 Taitokerau MB 72 (71 TTK 72) [pdf, 210 KB]

   ...budget for the Trust or how its expenses can be trimmed. However, I do think the trustees should reflect on whether the total trustee costs are appropriate. In the last financial year they were almost $71,000.00. I have approved trustee meeting fees of $400.00 gross for each trustee and $500.00 gross for the chairperson. The trustees should focus on reducing the number of meetings. The appointment of Mr Rishworth is likely to assist with that. How the trustees might reduce other...

6. [2019] NZEmpC 40 Berry v The Chief Executive of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment [pdf, 328 KB]

   ...by MBIE in relation to those events. He has commenced proceedings alleging breach of the duty of good faith and a finding to that effect. He does not seek any monetary penalties. He seeks reimbursement of legal costs and a disbursement for a filing fee. Factual outline [4] On 9 March 2017 an incident occurred at the Authority’s Auckland office relating to an investigation meeting which was to be conducted that day. A delay occurred in commencing the meeting because one of...

7. Hill v Whimp [pdf, 158 KB]

   ...[1] The Claimants lodged a claim under the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 (“the Act”) in relation to the dwelling at 2/22 Norwood Road, Bayswater, Auckland. The claim was deemed to be eligible under the Act. The Claimants filed a Notice of Adjudication under s 26 of the Act with the Weathertight Homes Resolution Service (“WHRS”) in December 2004. [2] A preliminary conference was held at the WHRS offices in Auckland on 22 December 2004. Initially there wer...

8. Proactive-Release-Family-Court-Associate-FINAL.pdf [pdf, 3 MB]

   I N C O N F I D E N C E SWC-22-MIN-0010 Cabinet Social Wellbeing Committee Minute of Decision This document contains information for the New Zealand Cabinet. It must be treated in confidence and handled in accordance with any security classification, or other endorsement. The information can only be released, including under the Official Information Act 1982, by persons with the appropriate authority. Establishing a New Family Court Associate Role Portfolio Justice On 16 February

9. Ashmore v Armstrong - Te Huruhi 12B (2021) 232 Waikato Maniapoto MB 219 (232 WMN 219) [pdf, 522 KB]

   232 Waikato Maniapoto MB 219 I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O WAIKATO MANIAPOTO In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Waikato Maniapoto District A20180003037 WĀHANGA Under Section 238, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Te Huruhi 12B I WAENGA I A Between ERIN ASHMORE Te kaitono Applicant ME And MARK ARMSTRONG, REREMOANA ASHMORE, PHYLLIS HEEMI, GARETH NEWTON, JUSTINE NEWTON, R

10. Domestic violence legislation & child access in New Zealand [pdf, 1018 KB]

    The Domestic Violence Legislation and Child Access in New Zealand Alison Chetwin Trish Knaggs Patricia Te Wairere Ahiahi Young Ministry of Justice Te Manatü Ture ii First published in May 1999 by the Ministry of Justice PO Box 180 Wellington New Zealand  Crown Copyright ISBN 0-478-20141-9 iii Foreword While i