Search Results

1. Auckland Standards committee 2 v Burcher Short [2015] NZLCDT 47 [pdf, 78 KB]

   ...comprehensive affidavit sworn by Mr Short approximately one month before the hearing was not served on Mr Burcher nor his counsel (both of them were out of New Zealand at the time). [13] Despite a number of promises, at pre-trial conference stage, to file evidence and a formal notice of response to proposed amended charges, by the date of the hearing Mr Burcher had not done either. Thus the Tribunal asked for him to give oral evidence, in part to allow him an opportunity of respo...

2. McCay-Woods v CAC 20008 & Anor [2014] NZREADT 103 [pdf, 69 KB]

   ...good friends with her although the cousin lived overseas mainly. The complainant seemed to be saying that, due to the licensee’s influence, her co-executrix ceased communicating with her. [38] The said High Court proceedings seem to have been filed at the High Court Dunedin some time in 2013. Those proceedings sought to remove the complainant as a trustee of her Aunt’s estate and appoint another beneficiary in her place. It seems that the complainant had cared for her Aunt in he...

3. [2017] NZEmpC 141 Lewis v Immigration Guru Ltd [pdf, 322 KB]

   ...pursuant to s 123(1)(c)(i) of the Act. [46] As Mrs Lewis was represented by her husband in the proceedings and was therefore not legally represented, she is not entitled to any award of costs. However, Immigration Guru is to reimburse Mrs Lewis for filing fees which she paid in both the Authority and the Court proceedings. M E Perkins Judge Judgment signed at 3 pm on 10 November 2017

4. Pita v Ngatiwai ki Whangaruru Whenua Topu Trust - Whangaruru Whakaturia 1D9A and Whangaruru Whakaturia 1D10A (2010) 10 Taitokerau MB 40 (10 TTK 40) [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...misunderstood its obligations it has come close to compromising the Māori reservation over 1D9A and 1D10A. In particular, the Trust has at times allowed the camping ground – where members of the public who are not of Ngatiwai are able to camp for a fee – to operate to the detriment of the beneficiaries of the reservation. The Trust did not deny that over the Christmas break the interests of the camping ground were given priority to those of the marae. Mr Carpenter even agreed...

5. LCRO 184/2018 DP v VK (17 December 2019) [pdf, 153 KB]

   ...by; (a) the Advisory Committee in relation to the matters set out in clause 5.0 of this Agreement; and (b) the Partners pursuant to a Resolution of the Limited Partnership. [36] Clause 4.4 committed the partners in [Company x] to bearing all the fees, costs and expenses associated with operating the partnership, including legal costs. Clause 4.8 obliged [Company z] to promptly provide some information to the Limited 8 Partners on request, and provided [Company z] with a discre...

6. Notification of Applications that have not been finally determined (over 6 months old) - 30 November 2019 [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   1 Notification of applications that have not been finally determined (over 6 months old) 30 November 2019 TAKE NOTICE THAT the following schedule of applications are hereby notified pursuant to rule 5.11(2)(b) of the Māori Land Court Rules 2011 being applications which are 6 months or older as at 30 November 2019, and which are currently held by the Registrar in the District set out, or, in the case of applications to the Chief Judge of Māori Land Court or those to the Mā

7. De Malmanche & Ors as Trustees of the Lynette De Malmanche Trust v Auckland Council (successor to the Auckland City Council) [2010] NZWHT Auckland 38 [pdf, 392 KB]

   Page | 1 IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2009-100-000088 [2010] NZWHT AUCKLAND 38 BETWEEN LYNETTE IDA DE MALMANCHE, MONICA CONSTANCE LENS and REDMOND TRUSTEES NO. 9 LIMITED as trustees of the LYNETTE DE MALMANCHE TRUST Claimants AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL successor to the AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL First Respondent AND ROBERT CLARKE BICKERTON Second Respondent (Withdrawn) AND PETER LEONARD LOWE Third Respondent AND BRENT WILSON Fourth Respondent AND ANT

8. Regulatory Impact Statement Tribunal Enhancements [pdf, 257 KB]

   ...inclusion of statutory timeframes, which apply both for the appellant and ACC,  for lodging applications and submissions – to help improve case throughput   the power to regulate procedures and issue practice notes   the power to make and enforce suppression orders   a  $30  filing  fee  (which  has  policy  approval  for  the  existing  accident  appeal  jurisdictions and will be confirmed in legislation for the new ...

9. Regulatory Impact Statement: Unilateral cancellation of voluntary time payment arrangements for unpaid fines [pdf, 733 KB]

   ...which apply both for the appellant and ACC, for lodging applications and submissions – to help improve case throughput  the power to regulate procedures and issue practice notes  the power to make and enforce suppression orders  a $30 filing fee (which has policy approval for the existing accident appeal jurisdictions and will be confirmed in legislation for the new tribunal)  the clear ability to strike-out cases, where appropriate. Under this option, additional re...

10. [2014] NZEmpC 213 Hixon v Campbell and Ors substantive [pdf, 264 KB]

    DOUGLAS KARL HIXON (LABOUR INSPECTOR) v JUSTIN CAMPBELL NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2014] NZEmpC 213 [17 November 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2014] NZEmpC 213 CRC 2/14 IN THE MATTER OF the referral of a question of law from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN DOUGLAS KARL HIXON (LABOUR INSPECTOR) First Plaintiff AND MARCIA JOY COLLINS Second Plaintiff AND JUSTIN CAMPBELL First Defendant AND DEAN EGG