Search Results

1. Mota v Accident Compensation Corporation (Deemed cover decision) [2025] NZACC 47 (20 March 2025) [pdf, 342 KB]

   ...to revoke deemed cover on the basis that the evidence did not establish that the epicondylitis was caused by the PIBA. [56] The Reviewer also awarded costs across the various reviews. The reviewer declined costs in relation to Mr Burger's fees. [57] On 15 October 2024, an appeal was filed against the Reviewer's decisions. Mr Forster requested that the appeal be progressed expeditiously, noting his view that there were no evidential issues, only questions of law, regardin...

2. 2019 Directory of Official Information A-C [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...Earners’ and Non-Earners’ Accounts. Motor Vehicle Account • Covers all personal injuries involving motor vehicles on public roads in New Zealand • Funded from petrol excise duty and a levy collected with the motor vehicle relicensing fee. Structure ACC is a Crown Entity under the Crown Entities Act 2004. ACC has a corporate office in Wellington and staff located throughout New Zealand. The Minister for ACC appoints a Board of eight non-executive members to govern ACC....

3. [2019] NZEnvC 033 Liu v Auckland Council [pdf, 457 KB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC 033 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal under s 325 of the Act BETWEEN DONGHUA LlU (ENV-2017 -AKL-000126) Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge D A Kirkpatrick sitting alone pursuant to s279(1 )(e) of the Act Hearing: at Auckland on 3 December 2018 Appearances: F Pilditch for Appellant N Batts for Responden

4. Dixon - Succession to Hare Manukau [2021] Chief Judges MB 887 (2021 CJ 887) [pdf, 942 KB]

   2021 Chief Judge’s MB 887 I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TE WAIARIKI In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Waiariki District A20190009270 CJ 2019/35 WĀHANGA Under Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Succession to Hare Manukau LYNNETTE ROSEMARY DIXON Te Kaitono Applicant Nohoanga: Hearing 26 March 2021, 2021 Chief Judge’s MB 486-525 (Heard at Rotorua v

5. B v ACC [2012] NZACA 5 [pdf, 127 KB]

   ...Mr Schmidt again wrote to the Registrar. By this time Mr Schmidt had discussed the reinstatement with Mr Tui, and he again asked for the Authority to consider the application for reinstatement and filed supporting documents from the historic ACC files, which had been sent to him in April 2007. 5 [25] On 3 October 2008, the Corporation informed Mr Schmidt that it disagreed that the appeal had been improperly withdrawn, and emphasised that the appellant had in fact never file...

6. [2018] NZEnvC 207 Sustainable Otakiri Incorporated v Bay of Plenty Regional Council [pdf, 825 KB]

   ...terms of s 104(3)(d) RMA when the application for the district consents was limited notified and, Sustainable Otakiri says, because of the scale and extent of adverse effects it should have been publicly notified. [7] Sustainable Otakiri has filed an application for declarations from the Court in relation to the first of these jurisdictional matters. That application is presently being case-managed separately. [8] There are two other appeals against those parts of the original dec...

7. LCRO 116/2019 RLF v DN (29 January 2020) [pdf, 211 KB]

   ...and BG’s estates. He asked for access to the family home to obtain his personal property. In the meantime, he asked for a “stop to disposing any more property” until “all issues are resolved”. [12] He sought reimbursement of legal fees, and other costs he had incurred, and compensation for his time to “retrieve” his, and Mrs LF’s property. [13] He asked a number of questions including why Mr DN had not provided him with a copy of Mrs LF’s will in 2014, and abou...

8. [2023] NZEnvC 206 Woolley v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 384 KB]

   ...appeal. [6] Since filing the appeal Mr Woolley made another application to transfer water for cropping and pasture in the event that his appeal is declined. The application was granted by a commissioner appointed by the Council. Mr Woolley has filed an appeal against a condition. (ENV-2023-CHC-008). [7] Mr Woolley’s intention is that this resource consent would be surrendered in the event that he is successful in his appeal being determined by this decision. Mr Woolley’s pr...

9. [2017] NZEnvC 088 Save Wanaka Lakefront Reserve Inc v Queenstown District Council [pdf, 12 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2017] NZEnvC 88 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act SAVE WANAKA LAKEFRONT RESERVE INCORPORATED (ENV-2016-CHC-54) Appellant QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent WANAKA WATERSPORTS FACILITY TRUST Applicant Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Environment Commissioner W R Howie Environment Commissioner K A Edmonds Hearing: at Wanaka

10. [2017] NZEnvC 088 Save Wanaka Lakefront Reserve Inc v Queenstown District Council [pdf, 12 MB]

    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2017] NZEnvC 88 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act SAVE WANAKA LAKEFRONT RESERVE INCORPORATED (ENV-2016-CHC-54) Appellant QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent WANAKA WATERSPORTS FACILITY TRUST Applicant Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Environment Commissioner W R Howie Environment Commissioner K A Edmonds Hearing: at Wanaka