Search Results

1. C v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 414) & Complainant A [2018] NZREADT 20 [pdf, 274 KB]

   ...particulars of the affairs of the licensee, the Agency, and the complainant is prohibited. [62] Pursuant to s 113 of the Act, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116 of the Act, which sets out appeal rights. Any appeal must be filed in the High Court within 20 working days of the date on which the Tribunal’s decision is served. The procedure to be followed is set out in part 20 of the High Court Rules. _____________________ Hon P J Andrews Chairpe...

2. LCRO 212/2016 LM v HR (22 September 2017) [pdf, 266 KB]

   ...issue the attached. We ask you destroy the earlier. …” [40] The Committee then issued a version of its determination with anonymised details of the Lawyers Standards Committees’ determinations. [41] The copy of the Standards Committee file provided to this Office did not include copies of the two determinations referred to. This Office was eventually able to obtain redacted versions from the Lawyers Complaints Service. When forwarding these, the Lawyers Complaints Servi...

3. Stone v CAC 412 & Lim [2019] NZREADT 20 (22 May 2019) [pdf, 589 KB]

   ...should advise the Tribunal in their memoranda. [68] Pursuant to s 113 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008, which sets out appeal rights. Any appeal must be filed in the High Court within 20 working days of the date on which the Tribunal’s decision is served. The procedure to be followed is set out in part 20 of the High Court Rules. ___________________ Mr. J Doogue Deputy Ch...

4. CAC 2106 v Hu [2024] NZREADT 36 (23 September 2024) [pdf, 143 KB]

   ...appropriate proportion of the Committee’s costs for Mr Hu to pay would be 25 per cent. 5 Defendant’s submissions (10 September 2024) at [2], [10] and [13]. 9 Affirmation of Mr Hu [28] There is an affirmation (10 September 2024) filed in support from Mr Hu. He expresses his remorse and accepts his actions as found by the Tribunal. He further accepts they affected the parties and the real estate agents’ profession more widely. He regrets his conduct on 6 October...

5. Pihema v Ngāti Whatua of Orakei Māori Trust Board – Section 722,790,792,793 and 794 Town of Orakei Blocks IX Rangitoto Survey District (1990) 3 Taitokerau Appellate Court MB 44 (3 APWH 44) [pdf, 479 KB]

   ...constllute a Maori ResefV<ltion wIIhln the meaning of the Act. Individual ownership of this land Is not sought. It has been vested In trust for communal use for the benefll of Maoris or Maori and Is In fact used as a marae. 22. This Court therefore feels thaflt Is appropriate that the general principles relating to Maori Reservations should be applied In this Instance. 23. In re Mount TauharaMaorl Rese.fV<ltlon 19n, 58 Taupo Minute Book.168, the MaorlLand Court reviewed qulle comprehens...

6. [2015] NZEmpC 189 Kirby v The NZ China Friendship Society [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...Zealand associates. The Society has a broad range of objectives, including the commemoration of the legacy in China of some of its founders, particularly that of Mr Alley. The Court was advised that no member of the organisation receives payment or fees for the performance of their duties, nor is any person paid by the Society for carrying out activities on its behalf. [23] The Society has a longstanding relationship with SBS, demonstrated by the fact that executive members of th...

7. [2020] NZEnvC 006 Antoun v Hutt City Council [pdf, 3.1 MB]

   ...Appellant S F Quinn and Ms C Wills for Respondent Date of Decision: 31 January 2020 Date of Issue: 31 January 2020 DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT A: Appeal upheld B: No reservation of costs REASONS Introduction [1] Fadi Antoun has filed in the Court: • An appeal pursuant to s 325(2) Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA/the Act) against an abatement notice issued to him by Hutt City Council (the Council) on 16 July 2019 (the abatement notice); 2 • An application...

8. LCRO 18/2021 MB v RP and ND (14 October 2022) [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...and (b) consulted with the beneficiaries, including Mrs HB, before they decided “it was appropriate for the trust” to sell its share of the property and invest the proceeds in an alternative investment. Application for review [24] Mr MB filed an application for review on 25 January 2021. 5 (1) Conflict of duties [25] He says there is no evidence to support the Committee’s conclusion that (a) Mrs HB’s interest as the owner of a one half share in the property, and...

9. ENV-2016-WLG-000058 Notice of Motion [pdf, 4.8 MB]

   ...of Steven Sanderson in support; and (c) List of persons to be served. 4. Also attached is an application for urgent waivers and directions in respect of the requirements under section 274 of the RMA for any interested parties. 5. The required filing fee of $56.22 has been paid via internet banking today using the details provided on the Environment Court Website. We will provide confirmation of this payment in due course. 6. If you have any questions please let us know. Yours faithf...

10. Hahn v Walke [2019] NZIACDT 19 (8 April 2019) [pdf, 306 KB]

    ...was accurate and had never facilitated the provision of unlicensed immigration advice. She was disturbed that the Authority had become the tool of a disgruntled competitor. The allegations were without substance and were malicious. Complaint filed with Tribunal [51] The Registrar of Immigration Advisers (the Registrar), the head of the Authority, filed a statement of complaint (24 April 2018) with the Tribunal, together with supporting documents. He has referred to the Tribunal...