King v CAC 20004 & Findlay [2014] NZREADT 78 [pdf, 89 KB]
...company in June 2013. [7] The authority to sell is, I believe, a red herring in that the appellant obtained an interim injunction to stop the sale of the house and then this was overturned when the High Court was told that $380,000 was owed in legal fees. This gross overcharging has since been dismissed as a “typing error” by Jack Porus and his company in his submissions to the Law Society. The High Court has not been approached by Jack Porus’s company to correct their “erro...