Search Results

Search results for filing fees.

7637 items matching your search terms

  1. [2011] NZEmpC 161 Rush Security Services Limited v Coverdale [pdf, 147 KB]

    ...the Authority’s compensation award of $3,000, compensation under s 123(1)(c)(i) of the Act is confirmed in that sum. [40] The defendant is entitled to costs and disbursements. If agreement cannot be reached on this issue then Mr Blair is to file a memorandum within 21 days and Ms Rush will have a like time in which to respond. A D Ford Judge Judgment signed at 12.30 pm on 5 December 2011

  2. [2009] NZEmpC WC 5/09 McCain Foods (NZ) Ltd v Services and Food Workers Union [pdf, 68 KB]

    ...[72] I note that the Employment Relations Authority reserved costs on the union’s application to it. All questions of costs should now be dealt with by this Court. If either party seeks an order, application should be made by memorandum filed and served within 1 month of this judgment with the respondent to it having a further 2 weeks to reply by memorandum. GL Colgan Chief Judge Judgment signed at 2.30 pm on 8th April 2009

  3. Building a return on investment capability in the Justice sector [pdf, 652 KB]

    ...return from supporting someone off benefit and into employment. 61. In general, no such relationship exists in the justice sector. There is mostly no direct link between volumes and costs, except in some limited areas such as legal aid and juror fees, for example. Even if an intervention successfully reduces the amount of crime in society, a fiscal saving will typically only result if subsequent decisions are taken to close facilities, reduce the workforce, or otherwise reduce costs....

  4. McCay-Woods v CAC 20008 & Anor [2014] NZREADT 103 [pdf, 69 KB]

    ...good friends with her although the cousin lived overseas mainly. The complainant seemed to be saying that, due to the licensee’s influence, her co-executrix ceased communicating with her. [38] The said High Court proceedings seem to have been filed at the High Court Dunedin some time in 2013. Those proceedings sought to remove the complainant as a trustee of her Aunt’s estate and appoint another beneficiary in her place. It seems that the complainant had cared for her Aunt in he...

  5. [2017] NZEmpC 141 Lewis v Immigration Guru Ltd [pdf, 322 KB]

    ...pursuant to s 123(1)(c)(i) of the Act. [46] As Mrs Lewis was represented by her husband in the proceedings and was therefore not legally represented, she is not entitled to any award of costs. However, Immigration Guru is to reimburse Mrs Lewis for filing fees which she paid in both the Authority and the Court proceedings. M E Perkins Judge Judgment signed at 3 pm on 10 November 2017

  6. Pita v Ngatiwai ki Whangaruru Whenua Topu Trust - Whangaruru Whakaturia 1D9A and Whangaruru Whakaturia 1D10A (2010) 10 Taitokerau MB 40 (10 TTK 40) [pdf, 130 KB]

    ...misunderstood its obligations it has come close to compromising the Māori reservation over 1D9A and 1D10A. In particular, the Trust has at times allowed the camping ground – where members of the public who are not of Ngatiwai are able to camp for a fee – to operate to the detriment of the beneficiaries of the reservation. The Trust did not deny that over the Christmas break the interests of the camping ground were given priority to those of the marae. Mr Carpenter even agreed...

  7. LCRO 184/2018 DP v VK (17 December 2019) [pdf, 153 KB]

    ...by; (a) the Advisory Committee in relation to the matters set out in clause 5.0 of this Agreement; and (b) the Partners pursuant to a Resolution of the Limited Partnership. [36] Clause 4.4 committed the partners in [Company x] to bearing all the fees, costs and expenses associated with operating the partnership, including legal costs. Clause 4.8 obliged [Company z] to promptly provide some information to the Limited 8 Partners on request, and provided [Company z] with a discre...

  8. Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Burcher, Short and MacDonald [2015] NZLCDT 47 [pdf, 78 KB]

    ...comprehensive affidavit sworn by Mr Short approximately one month before the hearing was not served on Mr Burcher nor his counsel (both of them were out of New Zealand at the time). [13] Despite a number of promises, at pre-trial conference stage, to file evidence and a formal notice of response to proposed amended charges, by the date of the hearing Mr Burcher had not done either. Thus the Tribunal asked for him to give oral evidence, in part to allow him an opportunity of respo...

  9. Notification of Applications that have not been finally determined (over 6 months old) - 30 November 2019 [pdf, 1.5 MB]

    1 Notification of applications that have not been finally determined (over 6 months old) 30 November 2019 TAKE NOTICE THAT the following schedule of applications are hereby notified pursuant to rule 5.11(2)(b) of the Māori Land Court Rules 2011 being applications which are 6 months or older as at 30 November 2019, and which are currently held by the Registrar in the District set out, or, in the case of applications to the Chief Judge of Māori Land Court or those to the Mā

  10. De Malmanche & Ors as Trustees of the Lynette De Malmanche Trust v Auckland Council (successor to the Auckland City Council) [2010] NZWHT Auckland 38 [pdf, 392 KB]

    Page | 1 IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2009-100-000088 [2010] NZWHT AUCKLAND 38 BETWEEN LYNETTE IDA DE MALMANCHE, MONICA CONSTANCE LENS and REDMOND TRUSTEES NO. 9 LIMITED as trustees of the LYNETTE DE MALMANCHE TRUST Claimants AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL successor to the AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL First Respondent AND ROBERT CLARKE BICKERTON Second Respondent (Withdrawn) AND PETER LEONARD LOWE Third Respondent AND BRENT WILSON Fourth Respondent AND ANT