7637 items matching your search terms
1 SHAW v HAMILTON CITY COUNCIL IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2021] NZEnvC 175 IN THE MATTER of objections under Section 23 of the Public Works Act 1981 BETWEEN MURRAY NELSON SHAW AND MARGARET EVELYN SHAW (ENV-2019-AKL-000316) Objectors AND HAMILTON CITY COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge M J L Dickey Commissioner J A Hodges Commissioner R M Bartlett Hearing: at
...cladding cracks were apparent at Page | 7 the time of the first assessor’s report more widespread cracking has occurred since then. PROCEDURAL ISSUES [14] This claim was originally heard in the Tribunal in June 2009. An appeal was filed against the determination and the High Court referred the matter back to the Tribunal to be reheard. A case conference was convened to set a timetable for the re-hearing and the parties agreed that even if a new adjudicator was...
WORKING DOCUMENT NOT GOVERNMENT POLICY MINISTRY OF JUSTICE Who is vulnerable or hard-to-reach in the provision of maternity, Well Child and early parenting support services? Addressing the Drivers of Crime: Maternity and Early Parenting Support 30 June 2010 WORKING DOCUMENT 2 NOT GOVERNMENT POLICY Maternity and Early Parenting Support Who is vulnerable or hard-to-reach in the provision of maternity, Well Child and early parenting support
-- . BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 111 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act BETWEEN CHARMAINE SUSAN FRIGHT (ENV-2017 -CHC-76) Appellant AND CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J E Borthwick Environment Commissioner R M Dunlop Environment Commissioner C J Wilkinson Hearing: at Christchurch on 15 March 2018 Appearances: A Preb
...Mr Halliday were the labour only subcontractors engaged to carry our building work and Mr Hay was a plasterer subcontracted to inspect the cladding and undertake texture coating and painting. Mr Hay did not attend the hearing although he did file a response and was served with notice of the hearing. [3] Other parties had been included in the claim but prior to hearing a partial settlement was reached with Masterbuild Services Limited, Arthur Taylor Builders Limited and A...
...SE’s statement in her 23 December 2013 letter to the trust’s lawyer she would “write a letter” was not an undertaking, and therefore her failure to write the letter was not a contravention of rule 10.3. Application for review [23] Mr CK filed an application for review on January 2021 in which he says the Committee’s “key conclusion” is wrong. He says he believes the Committee (a) failed to comment upon “key points” in his submissions, and (b) may have had “an un...
T H E N G Ā T I K A H U R E M E D I E S R E P O R T Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz t h e N g ā t i K a h u R e m e d i e s R e p o r t W A I T A N G I T R I B U N A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 3 W A I 4 5 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.gov
1 Notification of applications that have not been finally determined (over 6 months old) 31 May 2020 TAKE NOTICE THAT the following schedule of applications are hereby notified pursuant to rule 5.11(2)(b) of the Māori Land Court Rules 2011 being applications which are 6 months or older as at 31 May 2020, and which are currently held by the Registrar in the District set out, or, in the case of applications to the Chief Judge of Māori Land Court or those to the Māori Appell
...leases expired on 26 July 2013. On or around 13 December 2013 a notice to quit was served on behalf of the Trust on both Richard and Mereawaroa requiring them to vacate and deliver possession of the land. [2] On 7 March 2014 Richard and Mereawaroa filed various applications seeking relief from this Court. Those applications include: (a) Applications by Richard and Mereawaroa per s 19(1)(b) of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 (“the Act”) seeking an urgent injunction preventing t...
...broadly similar circumstances in ABB referred to earlier in this judgment. 12 In that case, the relevant clause prohibited the automatic passing on to employees who were not covered by a collective agreement without the payment of a bargaining fee by the employer to the 12 ABB, above n 9. union and, also automatically, the passing on to the members of any other union without the prior agreement of the first union. The C...