7637 items matching your search terms
Environment Court of New Zealand Annual Review Calendar Year 2015 By Members of the Court Environment Court of New Zealand Annual Review 2015 2 PUBLISHED MAY 2016 CONCERNING CALENDAR YEAR 2015 In this review Calendar year 2015: an overview by Principal Environment Judge ........................................ 4 Profile of the Court ........................................................................................................
© Crown Copyright, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Hon Nicole McKee Associate Minister of Justice Proactive release – Phase 4 of the Firearms Reform Programme – tranche 4 Date of issue: 31 January 2025 The following documents have been proactively released in accordance with Cabinet Office Circular CO (23) 04. Some information has been withheld on the basis that it would not, if requested under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA)
...request – information the subject of the request – duty to establish – Privacy Act 1993, ss 40 and 85 Reekie v Roberts [2013] NZHRRT 7 Burden of proof – unauthorised disclosure of personal information – loss of documents from departmental file – information privacy Principle 11 – Privacy Act s 85 Harris v Department of Corrections [2013] NZHRRT 15 Back to top C Causation – appropriate standard – whether sufficient to show contributing cause in sense of a material cause –...
...dealt with an interlocutory issue raised by the defendant by way of judgment dated 16 February 2017, in respect of whether the plaintiff was to be taken to have admitted the defendant’s affirmative defence of estoppel by virtue of her failure to file a formal response. I granted the plaintiff an extension of time for filing a reply to the defendant’s affirmative defences, which was subsequently done.9 Leave was also sought to file further submissions, which was granted. Both pa...
KATHLEEN CRONIN-LAMPE v THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MELVILLE HIGH SCHOOL [2023] NZEmpC 221 [5 December 2023] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2023] NZEmpC 221 ARC 55/2013 ARC 79/2013 ARC 48/2014 ARC 25/2014 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority AND
...estimate of cost for remedial work in respect of each of the locations and comprising 344 items which resulted in estimates for targeted repairs ranging between $143,000.00 and $158,000.00 excluding GST. [72] On 26 October 2006, Mr Cooney filed a supplementary brief of evidence wherein he deposed inter alia, that because of time and technical constraints at the conclusion of the meeting on 18 October 2006, the quantities and rates used to prepare the schedule of costs for rep...
...evidence was that monies from rental and other sources were paid into the bank account as directed by Mr Phillips. The fund was used to pay expenses in relation to Manu Ariki reservation including repairs, maintenance, extension work and legal fees. She said that she had never abused her power as a signatory in respect of that account, or any others for which she became a signatory. When asked by applicant counsel whether she authorised payments she replied: 5 I just authorise...
...Walker, the monies being transferred from their personal account although the monies’ origin was not apparent to Mr Todd at the time. This sum was used by Mr Todd to pay the balance of the monies owing on the land purchase and for associated fees and disbursements. After the transfer of this farmland to Mr Todd, there was also registered a mortgage to Mr Budge and Dr Walker for the full amount of the two advances. The mortgagee was originally recorded as “Glenmavis Limited”...
...should have recommended that Ms Kim seek independent legal advice. [79] Also Mr Feng was an unconvincing witness who could not even remember how he had come into possession of the original letter of confirmation which he was surprised to find in his file during his evidence, notwithstanding that he had previously sent a copy of it by facsimile to Ms Kim’s lawyers, Fortune Manning, prior to Ms Kim’s complaint. Mr Feng also accepted, under cross-examination, that due to his lack of...
...on 17 November 2015. 3 The issue of whether the Court had the ability to make the declaration as sought by the applicant was raised. At the conclusion of the conference I adjourned the case for hearing in December. I also directed counsel to file written submissions on the jurisdictional issue. [8] A hearing was held on 16 December 2015 to receive further submissions on the jurisdictional point. 4 Counsel for the applicant maintained that the Court has the ability to make the...