7637 items matching your search terms
GE.11-41617 (E) 240311 Core document forming part of the reports of States parties New Zealand* [30 September 2010] * In accordance with the information transmitted to States parties regarding the processing of their reports, the present document was not formally edited before being sent to the United Nations translations services. United Nations HRI/CORE/NZL/2010 International Human Rights Instruments Distr.: General 11 March 2011 Original: English H
CLAIM NO: 1276 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN DAVID JASON HARTLEY and FLEUR DIANE HARTLEY Claimants AND No first respondent, Jack Balemi having been struck out AND BRENT BALEMI Second Respondent AND MANUKAU CITY COUNCIL Third Respondent AND No fourth respondent, Brent Warren Lee having been struck out AND No fifth respondents, Grace Kit Ha Mak and Wong & Bong Trustee Co Ltd h
ISSN 1175 - 8120 (Print) ISSN 2463-3763 (Online) www.mäorilandcourt.govt.nz www.mäorilandonline.govt.nz JUNE | PIPIRI 2022 The purpose of the National Pänui / Te Pänui ä Motu is to provide notice to interested parties of hearings being conducted in, and applications received by, the Mäori Land Court. Only applications and sittings that were confi rmed at the time of this publication are listed. For more information, please contact your local Mäori Land Court offi ce. Individu
Distr. GENERAL CCPR/C/64/Add.10 30 May 1994 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 40 OF THE COVENANT Third periodic reports of States parties due in 1990 Addendum NEW ZEALAND* [1 April 1994] CONTENTS Paragraphs Page I. GENERAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 - 10 2 II. INFORMATION IN RELATION TO SPECIFIC ARTICLES . . . . 11 - 144 5 III. TOKELAU . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145 - 159 36
Crown/Māori Relations Summary of Submissions Te ara whakamua ā tātou Our path ahead Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully exclude
...of 17 April 2018 declining to fund further costs of treatment by Dr Gil Newburn and the costs of travel to attend treatment. [2] In the decision letter of 17 April 2018, the case manager said: ACC have considered the information held on your file for your injuries as well as the treatment plan report that was completed by Dr Gil Newburn on 22 March 2018. ACC considers, based on this information, that the treatment that is being offered by Dr Newburn is not necessary and appropr...
100WPS Trustee Limited v QLDC – Consent Order IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 127 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under s120 of the Act BETWEEN 100WPS TRUSTEE LIMITED (ENV-2023-CHC-37) Appellant AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge J J M Hassan – sitting alone under s279 of the Act In Chambers at Christchurch Date of Consent
VMR v CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY [2022] NZEmpC 5 [24 January 2022] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2022] NZEmpC 5 EMPC 386/2021 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN VMR First Plaintiff AND KRR Second Plaintiff AND WEN Third Plaintiff AND XDD Fourth Plaintiff AND CIVIL AVIATION AU
1 Iwi panels An evaluation of their implementation and operation at Hutt Valley, Gisborne and Manukau from 2014 to 2015 Final report 17 June 2016 Prepared for Ministry of Justice, New Zealand Police and Department of Corrections Prepared by Akroyd Research & Evaluation Shaun Akroyd Judy Paulin Kirimatao Paipa Nan Wehipeihana 2 Contents Glossary ..............................................................................
...This section describes how and why litigation experience is recognised by the Ministry. Why calculate litigation experience? Litigation experience levels are used to calculate the lead provider’s (lawyer’s) rate of remuneration for non-fixed fee cases. Note: Each lead provider (lawyer) is approved at a particular litigation experience level 12 Levels The three litigation experience levels are as follows: Level 1 – less than four years of litigation experience; Level...