Search Results

Search results for filing fees.

7488 items matching your search terms

  1. Form 23b Criminal Fixed A-C Police [pdf, 227 KB]

    Version 19 – September 2022 page 1 09/22 form 23b Tax Invoice Criminal Legal Aid Fixed Fees Schedules A, B & C: Police Prosecutions Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. Charges/CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Law firm Provider number Firm number Court type District Court High Court Court location Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed fe...

  2. LCRO Annual report 2023-2024 [pdf, 351 KB]

    ...This compares with 169 and 194 reviews completed in the previous two reporting years. Of the 193 completed reviews, 139 related to reviews filed in previous reporting periods. 1 Given that there is a 30 working day time frame for filing a review application, no exact match can be made between Standards Committee determinations and review applications for any given period of time. 2 This refers to actual numbers of completed reviews without taking into account when the...

  3. [2019] NZEmpC 57 Cornish Truck & Van Ltd v Gildenhuys [pdf, 235 KB]

    ...Cornish Truck & Van Ltd v Gildenhuys [2019] NZEmpC 6. 2 Gildenhuys v Cornish Truck & Van Ltd [2018] NZERA Auckland 101. [2] He also sought $4,500 for costs in the Authority, together with disbursements of $71.56, covering the filing fee (inclusive of GST). I understand the costs anyway have been paid to him by Cornish Truck. He also is entitled to be reimbursed for the filing fee. If the filing fee has not been paid to him, it is to be paid within 10 working da...

  4. NB v UJ Ltd [2021] NZDT 1498 (23 April 2021) [pdf, 187 KB]

    ...cars he had parked inside his yard. UJ LTD has paid the sum of $562.50 towards the cost of repairing the paintwork. 2. NB claims the sum of $9,420.00 for the cost of repairing the paint work on the car, depreciation for car, and the Tribunal filing fee. 3. The issues to be determined are as follows: a. Was UJ LTD negligent in pouring the concrete so that it splashed into an adjacent property? b. Was NB contributorily negligent by not protecting his car within his property? c. A...

  5. KT v BM [2021] NZDT 1571 (22 July 2021) [pdf, 182 KB]

    ...succeed. The claim for outgoings will not be offset against the bond, due to the lack of supporting evidence. While I accept that BM may have suffered some financial loss, this resulted from a situation of his own making. 15. KT has claimed the filing fee and statutory interest. There is no jurisdiction under s 43 Disputes Tribunals Act 1988 for the Tribunal to reimburse the filing fee. The amount of statutory interest potentially payable is just over $3.00. In the circumstances...

  6. LCRO 81/2018 QQ v RR (26 November 2019) [pdf, 548 KB]

    ...the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction Mr QQ has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Committee [X] which concluded there had been unsatisfactory conduct on his part and ordered him to reverse his fees and refund $150,000 in fees to Mrs RR. Both parties attended a hearing in [Area] on 31 January 2019. Mrs RR was represented by Mr TT. For the reasons that follow, the Committee’s determination has been reversed on review, as a re...

  7. [2023] NZIACDT 21 – WN v Lawlor (26 June 2023) [pdf, 140 KB]

    ...complainant is a national of Cambodia who came to New Zealand in 2016 and resides here. [5] Mr Lawlor was at the relevant time a licensed immigration adviser and a director of Lawlor & Associates Ltd, of Thames. [6] On 18 September 2019, Mr Lawlor filed a resident visa application under the skilled migrant category for the complainant. [7] Mr Lawlor sent an email to the complainant on 5 March 2020 attaching a document list for a work visa for his partner. A written service ag...

  8. U Ltd v J Ltd [2024] NZDT 762 (11 December 2024) [pdf, 121 KB]

    ...be obtained from the Ministry of Justice, Disputes Tribunal website. The Notice must be filed at the District Court of which the Tribunal that made the decision is a division, within 20 working days of the decision having been made. There is a $200 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a suppo...

  9. [2016] NZEmpC 46 Ngawharau v Porirua Whanau Centre [pdf, 72 KB]

    ...at [48]. 5 Binnie v Pacific Health Ltd [2002] 1 ERNZ, 438 (CA) at [14]. 6 Health Waikato Ltd v Elmsly [2004] 1 ERNZ 172 (CA). in respect of the Authority investigation because there was no evidence that any costs, apart from the filing fee, had been incurred by the plaintiff. [7] In his submissions on this aspect of the claim, Mr Paradza stated: … In the ERA [the] plaintiff was represented by Mr Chris Moses who was his advocate. In the absence of invoices from Mr...

  10. [2016] NZEmpC 24 Myatt (Labour Inspector) v Pacific Appliances Limited [pdf, 90 KB]

    ...determination was issued on 11 December 2013 ordering the defendant to comply with the Notice. 1 In addition, the determination imposed a penalty of $1,500 upon the defendant and there was an order that the defendant reimburse the Labour Inspector for a filing fee of $71.56. The defendant failed to take any steps in the proceedings before the Authority. [4] In a subsequent determination dated 25 August 2014, the Authority made further compliance orders that the penalty and fili...