Search Results

Search results for filing fees.

7488 items matching your search terms

  1. Otago Standards Committee v Klinkert [2014] NZLCDT 60 [pdf, 85 KB]

    ...in the practitioner’s trust account as of June 2006 were an asset of the Zs, thus included when calculating total assets against the relevant threshold to qualify for the subsidy. 2 (g) In response the practitioner created a document “File Statement Between the Date 1 AUG 2005… 10 OCT 2006” 3 1 Bundle of documents at 163. that falsely showed the Zs’ funds moving, on 2 May 2006, from the trust account to...

  2. PU v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 815 (4 December 2024) [pdf, 218 KB]

    ...be obtained from the Ministry of Justice, Disputes Tribunal website. The Notice must be filed at the District Court of which the Tribunal that made the decision is a division, within 20 working days of the decision having been made. There is a $200 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a suppo...

  3. [2023] NZIACDT 12 - XX v Xu (13 April 2023) [pdf, 252 KB]

    ...Immigration Consultants Ltd, of Auckland. [5] On 23 February 2022, the complainant and Ms Xu signed the latter’s service agreement. Ms Xu would apply for a student visa for the complainant’s mother and a partnership visa for her father. The fee was $345 (incl. GST but excl. Immigration NZ’s fees). [6] Ms Xu worked with the complainant and the relevant education provider to compile the necessary documents. The visa applications for the complainant’s parents were lodged w...

  4. Environment Court annual report 2007 [pdf, 514 KB]

    ...Presented to the House of Representatives pursuant to section 264(1) of the Resource Management Act 1991 E. 49 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 3 1. Profile of the Court 4 1.1 Members of the Court 4 1.2 Retirements and appointments 5 1.3 The Registry 5 1.4 The Court’s jurisdiction 6 2. Highlights for 2006/07 6 2.1 Case Management System...

  5. MX v BO & KO [2021] NZDT 1630 (13 July 2021) [pdf, 141 KB]

    ...view from MX’s property. 10. In addition, MX claims $1,100 to remove existing tree roots, $400 for a skip bin to remove existing tree roots, $400 to remove the trees, $1,200 to hire 3 skip bins to remove the trees, and $180 for the Tribunal filing fee. Issues 11. The issues for the Tribunal to determine are: (a) Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to make an Order for the removal of the trees; (b) Whether roots have grown through from the O’s property and caused damage;...

  6. LCRO 330/2013 PR v RW (17 July 2017) [pdf, 148 KB]

    ...of acting for Mr PR on the appeal Mr RW had the use of a Porsche motor vehicle (the vehicle) provided by Mr PR. There is disputed evidence on a number of matters relating to the vehicle: 3 (a) Whether it was given to Mr RW to offset against fees or whether it was loaned to Mr RW to enable him to visit Mr PR in Prison B, as Mr RW had no vehicle of his own. (b) Ownership of the vehicle.1 (c) The value of the vehicle. [8] Following the unsuccessful appeal Mr PR asked Mr RW to...

  7. Level 2 Protocol LVT [pdf, 120 KB]

    ...Tribunal will obtain confirmation from the operator that equivalent standards to those in courthouses are being met. 13. Any concerns about health and safety practices in the Tribunal should be raised with the Registrar in the first instance Filing of documents 14. All filing of documents should be by email wherever possible. 15. Documents may be filed by post where email is impracticable. 16. Registry offices will be open and may receive documents filed in person wher...

  8. [2019] NZEnvC 123 Schwartfeger v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 2.5 MB]

    ...position and obtain an appropriate consent in their own name. [4] The details of this are covered in the Court's previous decision [2016] NZEnvC 096 and I will not repeat that background. [5] Subsequent to the waivers granted in relation to fees there were several purported rescinding of those decisions and then further waivers granted. [6] At one stage, the Council allowed objection proceedings to be undertaken and advised in the decision to the Schwartfegers' that ther...

  9. KN Ltd v UC [2022] NZDT 194 (24 May 2022) [pdf, 99 KB]

    ...queried the wrong amount at the time and was told it was correct. UC says that she has been advised that having paid the amount requested of her that is the end of the matter. 4. The auctioneer claims the unpaid balance of $781.95, the Tribunal filing fee of $45 and interest at the Tribunal’s discretion. Issues 5. The issues for the Tribunal to determine are: (a) Whether the auctioneer is prevented from claiming further payment because it accepted the payment of $86.88 on th...