Search Results

Search results for filing fees.

7638 items matching your search terms

  1. [2019] NZEnvC 123 Schwartfeger v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 2.5 MB]

    ...position and obtain an appropriate consent in their own name. [4] The details of this are covered in the Court's previous decision [2016] NZEnvC 096 and I will not repeat that background. [5] Subsequent to the waivers granted in relation to fees there were several purported rescinding of those decisions and then further waivers granted. [6] At one stage, the Council allowed objection proceedings to be undertaken and advised in the decision to the Schwartfegers' that ther...

  2. [2015] NZEmpC 85 Agus Riyanto & 43 others v Dong Nam Company Ltd interlocutory [pdf, 181 KB]

    ...Limited SERL] evidencing the provision of the vessel and the crew to SERL, together with; 2 Idea Services Ltd v Dickson [2011] NZCA 14, [2011] 2 NZLR 522. 15. All invoices for charter fees; 16. All receipts for charter fees; 17. All (original) bank transfers, money order or any financial instrument made for the payment of charter fees; 18. Spreadsheets supporting the calculation of hire, with reference to the payme...

  3. LCRO 37/2025 PE v LZ (26 August 2025) [pdf, 183 KB]

    ...Committee considered that the professional conduct issues potentially raised by the complaint were those of alleged discourtesy, lack of timeliness, failure to inform the applicant of material and unexpected delays and failure to provide an estimate of fees on request. [18] In relation to the allegation of discourtesy, the Committee found that: (a) the respondent had been instructed not to advise clients of his departure; (b) Ms T shared responsibility for the retainer and remained i...

  4. MX v BO & KO [2021] NZDT 1630 (13 July 2021) [pdf, 141 KB]

    ...view from MX’s property. 10. In addition, MX claims $1,100 to remove existing tree roots, $400 for a skip bin to remove existing tree roots, $400 to remove the trees, $1,200 to hire 3 skip bins to remove the trees, and $180 for the Tribunal filing fee. Issues 11. The issues for the Tribunal to determine are: (a) Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to make an Order for the removal of the trees; (b) Whether roots have grown through from the O’s property and caused damage;...

  6. Environment Court annual report 2007 [pdf, 514 KB]

    ...Presented to the House of Representatives pursuant to section 264(1) of the Resource Management Act 1991 E. 49 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 3 1. Profile of the Court 4 1.1 Members of the Court 4 1.2 Retirements and appointments 5 1.3 The Registry 5 1.4 The Court’s jurisdiction 6 2. Highlights for 2006/07 6 2.1 Case Management System...

  7. Short - The Pukeroa Oruawhata Ahu Whenua Trust (2010) 5 Waiariki MB 297 (5 WAR 297) [pdf, 154 KB]

    ...surprising when the application is premised in part upon a submission that the application is affordable given the current asset size and revenues of the Trust. [20] An examination of those accounts indicates that in addition to the trustees’ fees, all six trustees receive directors’ fees from the various subsidiaries. In total for the year ending 31 March 2009, $259,018.00 was paid in trustees’ and directors’ remuneration. [21] The Court compares that to the total amount m...

  8. SN v K Ltd [2022] NZDT 117 (15 August 2022) [pdf, 108 KB]

    ...entitled to claim legal fees and interest? 11. Even if SN had been successful, I would not have been able to award legal costs and interest. The Disputes Tribunal is a lay persons Tribunal and parties are not required to consult a lawyer before filing a claim, although they can if they wish. Costs are prohibited in the Disputes Tribunal except in exceptional circumstances which do not apply here (section 43 Disputes Tribunal Act 1988). Parliament set up the Tribunal in this manner so th...

  9. KN Ltd v UC [2022] NZDT 194 (24 May 2022) [pdf, 99 KB]

    ...queried the wrong amount at the time and was told it was correct. UC says that she has been advised that having paid the amount requested of her that is the end of the matter. 4. The auctioneer claims the unpaid balance of $781.95, the Tribunal filing fee of $45 and interest at the Tribunal’s discretion. Issues 5. The issues for the Tribunal to determine are: (a) Whether the auctioneer is prevented from claiming further payment because it accepted the payment of $86.88 on th...

  10. Wellington Standards Committee v Skagen [2014] NZLCDT 82 [pdf, 173 KB]

    ...241(1)(b)) or Frequent Negligence or Incompetence (s 241(1)(c)). [3] The charges relate to the dealings which Mr Skagen had with Mr E and with Mr W and his lack of co-operation with the investigation that followed those dealings. [4] The practitioner filed a response to the charges and an accompanying affidavit. He engaged in a teleconference on 31 January 2014, but did not comply with the direction to file submissions in response to those of the applicant. He had health problem...