Search Results

1. [2021] NZEmpC 186 Restaurant Brands Ltd v Gill [pdf, 349 KB]

   ...Immigration New Zealand (INZ) a form referred to as INZ 1113 (the INZ form). An applicant would therefore need to engage with his or her employer to have the form completed. Mr Gill did so on this occasion. [12] RBL was well used to meeting such requests from its staff. Accordingly, on 3 February 2017, a human resources administrator forwarded the necessary documentation to Mr Gill. It included confirmation of Mr Gill’s employment by RBL, a copy of his IEA, a copy of the l...

2. OIA-119742.pdf [pdf, 2.7 MB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 24 April 2025 Ref: OIA 119742 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Independent Police Conduct Authority (IPCA) review Thank you for your email of 25 February 2025 to the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry), requesting information under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), about the review published by the IPCA titled ‘The Pol...

3. Appendix-14-Regional-Councils-Response-to-combined-request-for-information-under-section-92.pdf [pdf, 538 KB]

   ...Level 5, The Majestic Centre 100 Willis Street PO Box 5084 Wellington 6011 New Zealand T 64 4 894 5200 F 64 4 894 3305 www.nzta.govt.nz 1 Tēnā tātou, Ōtaki to north of Levin Highway Project- – Response to request for additional information pursuant to section 92 of the Resource Management Act 1991 This letter provides a response to the request for further information pursuant to section 92 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (“RMA”) receive...

4. 5_WK-respose-to-Regional-Councils-request-for-information-under-section-92-final-v2.pdf [pdf, 538 KB]

   ...Resource Management Act 1991 (“RMA”) received on 9th December 2022 in relation to the applications for resources consents1 to authorise the Ōtaki to north of Levin Highway Project (“Ō2NL Project” or “the Project”) The information requested and the Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency (“Waka Kotahi”) response is set out in the following table. No. Jurisdiction Information requested Waka Kotahi response Surface Water Takes 1. MWRC a) The Applicant has outlined that pa...

5. LCRO 141/2017 NS v RG and SM (12 October 2018) [pdf, 94 KB]

   ...experience I had had in my last purchase of property with unconsented and inadequate building work having been done, leaving me with unexpected expenses and inability to rent out the property concerned. [5] Mr RG added three clauses to the standard form Agreement: 19.0 LIM Report This Agreement is conditional upon the Purchaser obtaining a Land Information Memorandum (“LIM Report”) from the [Town] City Council entirely satisfactory to the Purchaser in all respects within fifteen...

6. NB v NF Ltd [2022] NZDT 143 (11 August 2022) [pdf, 135 KB]

   ...to might be unfair on one party. 16. This means that NB has not established her claim for a refund of the deposit paid and her claim is dismissed. Referee: R Merrett Date: 11 August 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

7. FB v TT Ltd [2022] NZDT 201 (17 July 2022) [pdf, 156 KB]

   ...to be valid indefinitely or for a reasonable period of time and if so, what was a reasonable period of time in the circumstances off this dispute? 2. What has occurred here is that the cost of steel has increased after the date this contract was formed. TT Ltd has attempted to pass that increased steel cost onto FB. 3. I am satisfied that the full quote/tender dated 8/7/21 including its terms and conditions was sent to FB’s project manager KB and accepted by him on her behalf by wa...

8. EQ v ND Ltd & DQ [2023] NZDT 9 (5 April 2023) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...contracted the Tribunal and again requested an adjournment on the basis that he was out of country and not reachable over the phone as he was in a remote area and the phone and internet is very limited. An adjournment was not granted. The Tribunal informed DQ that the hearing would proceed. [5] Whereas DQ advised that he made the latest adjournment request a week prior to his travel asking that the hearing be adjourned till 2023, the evidence is clear that DQ left the county knowing that...

9. LG v G Ltd [2024] NZDT 411 (28 May 2024) [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...of [LG] viewing.” 2. The boat arrived later than originally anticipated. LG viewed the boat with his partner on 19 December 2023 and decided that it was not what they wanted. He advised OG in an email that he would not purchase the boat and requested a refund. OG said the deposit was non-refundable. LG claimed to be refunded his deposit. 3. The issues to be determined to resolve the claim are: (a) Was LG entitled to cancel the contract? (b) If so, is LG entitled to be refunded...

10. 6.3 Searches and search rules

    ...be accessed as of right and those which require court permission.  It is important to note that the media do not have any special rights regarding access to court documents; the media’s rights are the same as those of the public. Access to court information is governed by various legislative provisions, as well as orders and directions set down by the court, such as (but not limited to): Senior Courts (Access to Court Documents) Rules 2017 District Court (Access to Court Documents) Rules 20...

    Located in:

    1. About >
    2. News & media >
    3. Media centre >
    4. Media information >
    5. Media guide for reporting the courts and tribunals: Edition 4.1 >
    6. 6.0 Access to court information