Search Results

1. Taniora v Crown - Pukemakoiti 2 and 4 (2018) 390 Aotea MB 268 (390 AOT 268) [pdf, 357 KB]

   ...the trustees pointed out that owners were sent copies of the request letters from TMOR with the notices of both the 2013 and 2015 meetings. Correspondence filed by the trustees from Ms Taniora, confirmed that she did receive notice of the TMOR requests prior to both hui. At the meetings, the funding requests were discussed and in 2015 a representative from TMOR also gave a presentation. The trustees did not take part in the discussion of the matter and all but one did not participa...

2. Stewart v Eru - Succession to Teressa Ivor Silcock (2020) 200 Waikato Maniapoto MB 184 (200 WMN 184) [pdf, 266 KB]

   ...land interests. (f) A fixture was set down to hear the application at Hamilton on 20 August 2019. (g) On 13 August 2019, counsel for Ms Nicola Silcock advised that she had filed a Family Protection Act claim in the Whangārei Family Court and requested that the succession application be adjourned until the Family Court proceedings were determined. I declined this adjournment application as I considered that the question of whether the respondent is entitled to succeed under the...

3. Application-to-provide-legal-aid-ServicesV21.8.pdf [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...bank account and GST number, if we don’t already have them. You must also provide a copy of a bank deposit slip or similar proof of bank account including bank logo, account name and account number. 8 Bank account number 9 GST number Demographic information This information is collected solely for the purposes of monitoring the age distribution of the provider pool for planning purposes. It will not be used for any other purposes. Answering this question is optional. 10 Date of birth d...

4. Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee 1 van Noort [2024] NZLCDT 33 (17 October 2024) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...documentation had been signed, but not registered. 37. On 10 June 2020, the Practitioner emailed KK advising he had made amendments to the documents he had prepared to support the Subsidy Application, further to instructions obtained from K and N, and requesting K to confirm whether the proposed recording of the $515,000 transfer in connection with the purchase of the Property “would be acceptable”.20 38. On 12 June 2020, KK replied to the Practitioner’s email of 10 June 2020, st...

5. NE v Accident Compensation Corporation (Reviewable Decision) [2025] NZACC 060 (8 April 2025) [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...Any issue that may have existed was overtaken by the Corporation’s earlier decisions of 27 and 29 September 2022. [3] The appellant says the Corporation delayed allocating the dates of injury to her covered claims when she had provided information to them. As a result, the appellant asserts deemed cover decisions for dates of injury at the time the events occurred, should be provided. [4] The Corporation says the September 2022 decisions are the pathway available for the...

6. M Ltd v P Ltd [2023] NZDT 416 (30 August 2023) [pdf, 200 KB]

   ...date, M Ltd also paid a sum of $2,777.25 to P Ltd in error. That money was supposed to be paid to another third party that M Ltd owed money to. It was paid into P Ltd’s bank account. 3. M Ltd contacted P Ltd soon after the error was noticed and requested that the money be repaid back to M Ltd. P Ltd refused to return the money. 4. M Ltd contacted its bank and paid for a recovery request which was actioned by M Ltd’s bank. That request from the bank was declined. 5. M Ltd...

7. B Ltd v NC [2024] NZDT 490 (31 May 2024) [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...provided in July to August 2022 in relation to the fire aspects of a Council Notice to Fix a three-storey building at [Address]. NC is the owner or trustee owner of the building, and B Ltd claims that it was initially instructed by her agent, BD. BD informed B Ltd on 28 July 2022 that his agency had been terminated, but B Ltd claims to have done some further work in following days dealing with NC’s nephew NN, who is an architect. 2. The issues to be determined are: a) Was B Ltd engag...

8. OIA-122824.pdf [pdf, 940 KB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 8 July 2025 Our ref: OIA 122824 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Harmful Digital Communications Act 2015 Thank you for your email of 9 June 2025, requesting under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), the number of court applications and proceedings under the Harmful Digital Communications Act 2015. Specifically,...

9. Safe harbour provisions

   On this page: You may be legally responsible for all content on your website or app Are you an online content host? How to protect yourself when someone complains about content on your site – the ‘safe harbour’ process Forms Contact details Details of why the content is illegal or harmful You may be legally responsible for all content on your website or app If you host a website or app that other people can post to, you may be legally responsible for their content. You can’t be held r...

   Located in:

   1. Courts >
   2. Civil >
   3. Harmful digital communications

10. Henderson - Waiohiki 1D2B10D (2016) 55 Takitimu MB 83 (55 TKT 83) [pdf, 337 KB]

    ...Then in 1995 Rapihana Kopu and Ngareipa Hawaikirangi gifted their shares in the land to their nephew Bill Henderson. 5 [7] Mr Henderson is currently the sole owner of the land. [8] On 8 May 2016 Mr and Mrs Henderson signed an agreement (per Form 31 of the Māori Land Court Forms) to transfer the whole of Waiohiki 1D2B10D by way of gift from Mr Henderson solely to both of them as joint tenants. It is not intended that monetary consideration be paid under the terms of the agreemen...