Wellington Standards Committee 2 v O'Connor [2023] NZLCDT 21 (17 May 2023) [pdf, 196 KB]
...O’Connor during his recuperation. [10] Mr Paine advanced his submission that there is no risk to the public posed by Mr O’Connor, by stating “Mr O’Connor has nearly a decade in practise (sic) without complaints from clients, only by former friends who are clients”. [11] The second ground advanced by Mr Paine at the hearing was that the practitioner ought to be allowed to continue in practice, even in the face of what he conceded to be an “on the table” suspension...