[2006] NZEmpC CC 12/06 Bayliss Sharr & Hansen v McDonald [pdf, 85 KB]
...agree about the content of the bundle of documents to be made available to the Court. This was the subject of a memorandum from Mr Twomey on 10 March 2006. [5] This memorandum raised for the first time a fundamental problem inherent in the form of the proceedings. The plaintiff sought to challenge findings of fact made by the Authority and have them set aside in a non de novo hearing in which no evidence was to be called. That was something which the Court was not properly abl...