Search Results

1. Baigent v ACC interim [2014] NZACA 15 [pdf, 55 KB]

   ...backdated attendant care compensation, which Mr Baigent declined because he contended that compensation should be based on the rates paid for 24-hour attendant care by a registered nurse, as this was the level of his actual care needs. [5] I have no information concerning the negotiations that took place between 1998 and March 2006, and I have therefore confined the balance of the background to cover the subsequent review and appeal decisions concerning the rate at which Mr Baigent’...

2. Adams v ACC [2015] NZACA 3 [pdf, 69 KB]

   ...accident, in order to calculate the appropriate level of ERC. [6] The solicitor for Mr Adams wrote a letter to the Corporation on 28 June 1979 recording that no weekly compensation had been paid since 13 May and acknowledging that the Corporation had requested certain financial information. [7] The solicitor advised the Corporation that Mr Adams had earned $10,900 in the year ending 31 March 1978 working for Murupara Motors. In the year ending 31 March 1979, being the year of the a...

3. Morgan v ACC [2010] NZACA 10 [pdf, 80 KB]

   ...telephone. 2 [5] The appellant was granted cover and had his weekly compensation calculated and paid to him by State Insurance under the Accident Compensation Act 1972 (“the 1972 Act”). [6] The appellant was unable to return to any form of work due to his leg injury. [7] His leg was finally amputated in early 1977 and he was paid a lump sum for the loss of his leg in late 1977. [8] The Corporation continued to pay weekly compensation at an incorrect rate...

4. 2017 NZSSAA 025 (8 June 2017) [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...incurred substantial debts through the fraudulent use of credit cards. What the appellant knew about a benefit [23] The Ministry claims that the appellant knew that the partner was illicitly receiving a benefit, as he assisted her to provide false information to the Ministry, and this link with the Ministry ought to have put him on notice of the benefit payments. [24] The Ministry produced two documents addressed “to whom it may concern”. One is dated 16 September 2013 and the...

5. Ellis — Matapihi No 1 B No 2C No 2D (2010) 2010 Chief Judge’s MB 25 (2010 CJ 25) [pdf, 124 KB]

   ...applicant also challenges the validity of subsequent orders whereby Matiu Ellis transferred the shares to his son Ratahi Matiu Ellis. Ratahi Matiu Ellis then partitioned out his shares in the block, he now owns the block Matapihi 8A (general land) the former parent title Matapihi 1B2C2D is now known as Matapihi 8B Block. 4. Summary of applicant’s claim The applicant asserts that she has been adversely affected by the above order and subsequent orders and further that the original app...

6. Godinich v Guan Thye Heng Co Ltd [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...Room Deck – Waterproof Membrane 4.4.1 The drawings show that this deck was to be constructed with timber joists, spanning from a wall plate fixed to the external wall of the house to a double beam on timber posts. The deck surface was to be formed by 18 mm plywood with a waterproof membrane dressed up 150 mm on all sides. This is what the designer wanted, although waterproofing would not be a requirement of the Building Code. 4.4.2 The deck has been tiled with large reconst...

7. [2012] NZCA 508 CA414/2012 Moodie v The Employment Court and Strachan [pdf, 147 KB]

   ...applicant. (b) Ms Strachan was entitled to half of the net profits of the applicant’s practice for the period of her employment together with half of the practice’s bank balance as at 31 January 2006, representing an allowance for work performed by her before that date. (c) The office purchase and rental arrangements were beyond the Employment Court’s jurisdiction. (d) Ms Strachan’s personal grievance was raised within time. (e) Ms Strachan was dismissed constructi...

8. E55 Heather Kirkham - EIC - the Crown [pdf, 694 KB]

   ...Options requires the Consent Holder to prepare a Legacy Use Options Plan (LUOP), which would appear to satisfy many of the concerns raised above about long term use. g. However 198C and (b) allows the LUOP to be submitted one month prior to any request for a plan change. 198C(c) allows the LUOP to be lodged “three months prior to the lodgement of any resource consent application by the Consent Holder (Panuku?) enabling the redevelopment of the area occupied by Bases B-G that would re...

9. Tait v Kruger - Tauarau Block (2021) 252 Waiariki MB 180 (252 WAR 180) [pdf, 303 KB]

   ...June 2019 and 17 July 2019, and twice in the Beacon newspaper on 28 June 2019 and 10 July 2019. The advertisement was headed up as follows: Tauarau Marae Ngatirongo Hapū AGM [10] The advertisement also noted that: (a) Trustee application forms had to be supported by two whānau members and be accompanied by a CV and connection to a first schedule owner of the Tauarau land block; (b) Applicants had to be prepared to attend all trustee/marae committee meetings and actively...

10. LCRO 160/2017 EH v FP (23 April 2018) [pdf, 192 KB]

    ...a meeting on [DATE], the property owners “endorsed appointment of three trustees”, Mr FP, Mr [TF], and Mr [FL], the owner of [ADDRESS]. [7] In [DATE] a landslip on the accessway occurred resulting in erosion. A geotechnical engineer was requested by one of the landowners “to assess the potential and remediation work required”. [8] In [DATE], Ms [ZJ], the owner of [House 3] proposed to carry out work on that property. Concerned about the risk of a further landslip, Mr EH...