Search Results

1. Mercury NZ Limited 228 [PDF, 140 KB]

   ...Mercury is not a trade competitor for the purposes of section 308C of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA). Interest in proceeding 5. Mercury is interested in part of the proceedings. 6. The part of the proceedings Mercury is interested in is the requested deletion of any provisions (including objectives, policies, rules and standards) relating to the inclusion of the Auckland Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAAQS) within the Proposed Plan. 7. Mercury supports the relief sought...

2. North Eastern Investments Limited 236 [pdf, 168 KB]

   ...provision in Residential areas. I agree that the introduction of the additional criteria by Auckland Council in their decision is a substantive change to the Unitary Plan which will not give effect to sustainable management and support the relief requested by the appellant, being the deletion of the following provisions: i. H4.8.1(1)(b), H4.8.1(2)(c), H4.8.1(3)(c), H4.8.2(1)(a)(i), H4.8.2(2)(i)(i), H4.8.2(3)(k)(i), H5.8.1(1)(a), H5.8.1(2)(c), H5.8.1(3)(c), H5.8.2(1)(a)(i), H5.8....

3. Mercury NZ Limited 217 [PDF, 141 KB]

   ...Mercury is not a trade competitor for the purposes of section 308C of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA). Interest in proceeding 5. Mercury is interested in part of the proceedings. 6. The part of the proceedings Mercury is interested in is the requested deletion of any provisions (including objectives, policies, rules and standards) relating to the inclusion of the Auckland Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAAQS) within the Proposed Plan. 7. Mercury supports the relief sought...

4. [2017] NZEmpC 112 Chevelle Motors Ltd v Cranswick [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...Nevertheless, Ms Tretheway states that overhead costs were incurred by the Community Law Centre on behalf of Ms Cranswick in preparing documents, phone calls and the time counsel spent on preparing for the case. That being the position, the costs that are requested are as follows: (a) photocopying and courier charges - $200; (b) reimbursement of Community Law Centre expenses in preparation of documents, which included affidavits and submissions and preparation for the case inclu...

5. Proactive release – Proposed changes to the incitement provisions in the Human Rights Act 1993 [pdf, 2.8 MB]

   ...changes to the incitement provisions in the Human Rights Act 1993 Date of issue: 13 April 2021 The following documents have been proactively released by the Ministry of Justice. Some information has been withheld on the basis that it would not, if requested under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA), be released. Where that is the case, the relevant section of the OIA has been noted and no public interest has been identified that would outweigh the reasons for withholding it. No....

6. ENV-2016-AKL-000277 Auckland Transport v Kiwirail Holdings Limited consent order [pdf, 912 KB]

   ...under s 279(1) of the Act, such order being by consent, rather than representing a decision or determination on the merits pursuant to The Court understands for present purposes that: (a) all parties to the proceedings have executed the memorandum requesting this order; 3 (b) all parties are satisfied that all matters proposed for the Court's endorsement fall within the Court's jurisdiction, and conform to the relevant requirements and objectives of the Act including...

7. Mercury NZ Limited 233 [PDF, 141 KB]

   ...Mercury is not a trade competitor for the purposes of section 308C of the Resource Management Act 1991. Interest in proceeding 5. Mercury is interested in part of the proceedings. 6. The part of the proceedings Mercury is interested in is the requested deletion of any provisions (including objectives, policies, rules and standards) relating to the inclusion of the Auckland Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAAQS) within the Proposed Plan. 7. Mercury supports the relief sought by Ne...

8. [2016] NZEmpC 132 Davidson v Kelly [pdf, 53 KB]

   ...liberty to enforce payment of the debt. [7] I reserve any issues as to interest payable from the date of the default, the date of payment, and as to costs in respect of Ms Davidson’s application for the above compliance order. Although I was requested to consider the issue of costs now, I will defer doing so until the conclusion of the period for the making of the agreed payments. B A Corkill Judge Judgment signed at 3.00 pm on 21 October 2016

9. [2019] NZEmpC 135 Mani v Sharma [pdf, 189 KB]

   HAROLD MANI v SUMIT SHARMA [2019] NZEmpC 135 [4 October 2019] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2019] NZEmpC 135 EMPC 159/2018 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN AND HAROLD MANI First Plaintiff ICON CONCEPTS 2012 LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) Second Plaintiff AND SUMIT SHARMA Defendant

10. [2019] NZEmpC 92 Samuels v Employment Relations Authority [pdf, 167 KB]

    ...proceedings on time; • a failure to file a marked-up copy of the statement of claim as required by the Employment Court Regulations 2000; • a failure to file a court-directed sixth amended statement of claim; • a failure to respond to Registry requests in relation to outstanding matters in a timely manner; and • a failure to file and serve affidavits for hearing. [3] The Employment Court may make an unless order in appropriate circumstances. The purpose of an unless ord...