Search Results

1. [2012] NZEmpC 38 Munro v Hibiscus Coast Security [pdf, 112 KB]

   WAYNE DESMOND MUNRO V NS SECURITY LIMITED, FORMERLY KNOWN AS HIBISCUS COAST SECURITY LIMITED NZEmpC AK [2012] NZEmpC 38 [2 March 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2012] NZEmpC 38 ARC 30/11 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN WAYNE DESMOND MUNRO Plaintiff AND NS SECURITY LIMITED, FORMERLY KNOWN AS HIBISCUS COAST SECURITY LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 10 November 2011 (Heard at Auck

2. Regulatory Impact Statement 2012 Lawyers and Conveyancers ActLawyers Practice Rules practice on own account amendment regulations [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...NZLS that they are a suitable person to practise on their own account, having regard to several matters including the fields of law in which they practise and any other matters the NZLS considers relevant. Problem definition 4. The NZLS has formed the view that failures in business practices can often lead to corner cutting in the delivery of legal services to clients. As a result clients may receive a legally unsatisfactory outcome, be dissatisfied with the legal process and ul...

3. [2008] NZEmpC CC 6/08 George v Carter Holt Harvey Woodproducts Nelson [pdf, 41 KB]

   ...subject to his undertaking as to damages and pending further order of the Authority. This order is subject to the following condition. [41] CHH at its discretion may call on Mr George to perform his pre- injury work or other work of the sort performed by him since May 2007 as a part of a graduated return to work programme as recommended by Mr George’s medical advisors. [6] The plaintiff has challenged specific aspects of that determination and thereby brought the matter before th...

4. [2009] NZEmpC WC 26/09 Parker v Silver Fern Farms Ltd [pdf, 47 KB]

   ...February 2009 (WA 12/09). Although it accepts that the applicant may have disagreed strongly with the Authority’s determination and taken steps after it was issued to have it challenged, he did not either notify the respondent or lodge a pro forma challenge with the Court within time as he could easily have done. [10] The respondent relies on the reasoning in a judgment of this Court, An Employee v An Employer1. In that case the applicant took no steps after receiving the Auth...

5. [2006] NZEmpC WC 22/06 South Taranaki Free Kindergarten Association v McLennan [pdf, 59 KB]

   ...compensation. The Authority’s findings in this regard are confirmed including the finding of one-third contribution. The award for lost wages is to run until 4 August 2006, the last day of the hearing of this matter. Costs [51] Counsel are requested to confer on the question of costs. If these cannot be resolved counsel for the plaintiff is to file a memorandum of costs by 31 January 2007. The defendant will have 14 days within which to respond. C M Shaw JUDGE...

6. Rautangata v Rautangata– Opuatia No 6D No 2D Block (2013) 63 Waikato Maniapoto MB 132 (63 WMN 132) [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...interest grants her a right of occupation of the land, and therefore she should not be ordered to remove the house as that is not required to give practical effect to any order; 7.13 In the event the Court is minded to make a monetary award leave is requested to file evidence as to the extent of compensation to be awarded. Respondents’ submissions [8] The respondents’ submissions are: 8.1 It is accepted that Part 8 of the Act does not apply to this matter; 8.2 The Court’s...

7. Environment Court annual report 2002 [pdf, 139 KB]

   ...discussions or are undergoing further mediation with the expectation that they too will settle. Only 74 (22%) cases have not resulted in full agreement being reached between the parties. These cases were remitted for further management, which may result in formal hearings being held. Anecdotal evidence suggests an increasing determination by parties to seek a solution, that may require more than the one mediation session, than may have been the case in previous years. This is leading to...

8. Falwasser v Olsen - Matata Parish 6A (2014) 107 Waiariki MB 74 (107 WAR 74) [pdf, 150 KB]

   ...view, is no different to the benefit that the two other Marae, Oniao and Rangiaohia will obtain. [39] None of the Marae will receive any financial income from the lease. Nor will the three Marae receive any direct benefits from the lease such as formed access ways or the connection of electricity. What they will receive is an opportunity, if they wish to accept it, for the Marae to be connected to the Waste Water Treatment Plant at no costs to the Marae. It is clear that the pr...

9. Joe Atama Adams Pomare Whānau Trust v Adams - Waiaua A1C (2014) 93 Taitokerau MB 253 (93 TTK 253) [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...block. However, they do associate with the block in accordance with tikanga Māori. The Atama whanau are in the process of building a house on the block. Photographs filed by the applicant show what appears to be a well constructed house with a formed driveway and a cleared area around the site of the house. The house is near completion but is not yet occupied. It is intended that Jaroz Atama Adams Popata and her husband Hone Popata will move in and occupy the house later this mon...

10. Paniora v Kereopa - Waipoua 2B3D2A2A and Waipoua 2B3D2A2B2C (2015) 99 Taitokerau MB 227 (99 TTK 227) [pdf, 568 KB]

    ...Paati’s half share in Waipoua 2B3D2A2 (i.e. a 2/6 th share). This would result in Toa Paati being the sole owner of Waipoua 2B3A1A and Te Ataarangi Paniora having 5/6 ths and Toa Paati a 1/6 th share of Waipoua 2B3D2A2. Te Ataarangi Paniora requested time to talk over the proposed arrangement with Toa Paati. The application was adjourned to 29 November 1945 for that discussion to take place. [18] The Court sat at Waipoua on 29 November 1945. 13 Te Atarangi Paniora and To...