McCarthy & Anor v CAC 20007 & Anor [2014] NZREADT 94 [pdf, 53 KB]
...that the buyers had to beware and instead imposed a positive duty on the agents to disclose. He submitted that the doctrine of caveat emptor has no application under Rule 6.5. • He submitted that the Complaints Assessment Committee incorrectly formed the view that the decision to exclude the due diligence provisions in the agreement with the sale and purchase was relevant to Mr Matutinovich’s obligations. He submitted that the Complaints Assessment Committee seriously failed to c...