Search Results

1. Takarangi v Owens - Hautu 2B1B2A No 3 - (2018) 383 Aotea MB 50 (383 AOT 50) [pdf, 371 KB]

   ...Tauhara Middle 4A2B2CBlock - Opepe Farm Trust (1996) 68 Taupō MB 27 (68 TPO 27); Spencer v Spencer [2013] NZCA 449 at [122] Apatu v Apatu HC Napier CIV 2009-441-195, 19 December 2011, at [21] 383 Aotea MB 56 [22] In the circumstances, Mr Bhullar requests that the funds held on term deposit ($177,116) be distributed to the beneficial owners according to their shares. Mr Bhullar submits that if the order for distribution is granted the issue of overpayments will be resolved as f...

2. E65 John Parlane - Traffic - EIC - VHHL [pdf, 1 MB]

   ...Closures; (d) Servicing and Deliveries. The Proposed Traffic and Transportation Conditions 9. I have based my assessment of the conditions on the annotated version attached to the evidence of Vaughan Smith for VHHL. Mr Smith has shown in annotated form the changes sought by VHHL to the conditions proposed by Panuku with its evidence in chief. My understanding is that the amended traffic conditions in Mr Smith’s evidence have been agreed between Panuku and VHHL. I understand...

3. The Maori Trustee v Brightwell - Kaipakopako 2C2 (2016) 354 Aotea MB 226 (354 AOT 226) [pdf, 287 KB]

   ...the land by the Māori Trustee, its status and future utilisation. [10] Ms Brightwell also submits that the minutes of the meeting of owners held on 20 May 2015 contain discrepancies and adds that the Māori Trustee has not provided information requested regarding the distributable income for the trust. Ms Brightwell claims that the Māori Trustee has not provided audited accounts for the year ended 31 March 2015 and that the trust is not GST registered.

4. Te Tumu Paeroa - Te Aroha Blk 3 Sec 1B and Sections 2 and 3 Block III Aroha SD (2016) 119 Waikato Maniapoto MB 95 (119 WMN 95) [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...report on the proposal to complete the programme of development and to obtain the owners’ support for an aggregation of the blocks. The notice was posted to 1,250 owners for whom the Māori Trustee held a current address. A separate response form was also enclosed with the notice, so as to provide the owners who were unable to attend with an opportunity to state their views. Cyclone Lusi affected the weather on the day of the meeting, so that the turnout was disappointing – 2...

5. Evidence Brief: Alcohol Ignition Interlocks [pdf, 324 KB]

   ...no long term effects for reducing recidivism.”ii This finding was based on one randomised controlled trial and 10 controlled trials. The randomised controlled trial covered in the Cochrane Library review studied alcohol offenders who had requested and been granted licence reinstatement. The offenders were randomly assigned to interlock and control groups; 17 out of 698 in the interlock group reoffended, while 46 out of 689 in the control group reoffended. That is, being...

6. [2018] NZEmpC 89 Lorigan v Infinity Automotive Ltd [pdf, 268 KB]

   ...Zealand Law Society concerning the lawyers who acted for Infinity, and that a Standards Committee had dismissed Mr Lorigan’s complaint without requiring either of the lawyers involved to respond to that complaint. It is understood that Mr Lorigan requested the decision of the Standards Committee to be reviewed, but the review officer has not to date taken any step in relation to that complaint. Principles [12] From time to time, the Court is required to consider whether proceedin...

7. [2017] NZEmpC 105 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd & Anor [pdf, 159 KB]

   ...likely dismiss the application for joinder. However, it was submitted that the further affidavit evidence filed by Mr Hay and Mr Sellar as described above could support Mr Hay’s application for joinder. [19] He said that the Threshold Matrix forms part of LSG Group’s corporate governance rules, and sets out who within that Group had authority to make decisions, and how those should be made in particular situations. Both Ms Park and Mr Bryant had acknowledged that such a M...

8. LCRO 260/2013 CS v RV (18 July 2017) [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...complaint that was essentially based on his inability to secure a further grant of legal aid, so the new lawyer could be paid. The Committee does not say what, if anything, should have been done between September 2011 and June 2012. [29] A request that the Committee provide any further information that it relied on did not result in anything more being provided to this Office. [30] Although Mr CS should have been, but was not actively monitoring the file, it is unclear what, if...

9. Brown v TPL 4 Limited - Motatau 1B5B5 (2017) 158 Taitokerau MB 88 (158 TTK 88) [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...were sold. The question is whether this was an assignment prohibited by the lease, or is otherwise an alienation requiring approval by the Court. [9] When CHH divested its forestry assets in 2006, it sold shares in other lessee companies which formed part of its forestry assets. One of those was NZ Forestry Products Limited, which held a lease over land administered by the Maraeroa C Incorporation and other Maori land trusts. In The Proprietors of Maraeroa C Block v NZ Forest Pro...

10. [2017] NZEmpC 78 Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections v CANZ Inc [pdf, 191 KB]

    ...Restructuring in 2015 [8] Some context is required before considering these issues. In early 2015 the Chief Executive began a restructuring project. A consultation document about that restructuring called “Lifting Productivity & Performance in New Zealand’s Prisons” was released for comment on 9 April 2015. Amongst other changes this proposal affected case management work but did not reduce the overall number of positions for Case Managers. The proposal was explain