AGR v ZTX Ltd [2013] NZDT 309 (2 September 2013) [pdf, 80 KB]
...that the car would require re-certification as its registration had lapsed in 1997. XY stated that at the completion of the restoration it would be like a new car, repaired, painted and undersealed. [2] The work carried out protracted and XY requested more money than had been agreed upon to complete the work. Over the course of 14 months AGR paid a total of $25,000 to XY at ZTX Ltd. On 1 July 2012 AGR collected the car which had been repaired and repainted. XY assured AGR that th...