Search Results

1. KI Ltd v TS [2023] NZDT 256 (14 June 2023) [pdf, 137 KB]

   ...he did not wish to deal with TS or any further orders after this. 10. I find, because of the evidence, which included that from the courier company confirming the delivery of two packages addressed to TS from KI’s company, the GPS tracking information showing the courier delivery vehicles at TS’s address, the lack of evidence about any follow-up from TS with KI about allegedly not receiving these packages after their expected arrival dates, and that TS received a refund from KI fo...

2. UC v O Ltd [2024] NZDT 76 (18 February 2024) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...evidence that the two vacuum cleaners (VCs) he returned had been returned by two people who had originally purchased them with full refunds provided. UC said there was no evidence that the serial numbers written by O Ltd’s staff on the Customer Refund Request forms for these two customers matched the two VCs he had returned. b. However, I prefer the evidence from O Ltd, supported in documents, that when the VCs were returned by the original purchasers the serial numbers were includ...

3. OIA-121103.pdf [pdf, 815 KB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 6 May 2025 Ref: OIA 121103 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Data on prison sentences Thank you for your email of 7 April 2025 to the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry), requesting under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), data on prison sentences. Specifically, you requested: …Can you please provide a breakdown of the to...

4. Ratnam v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal application) [2025] NZACC 107 [pdf, 141 KB]

   ...her current diagnosis and cause for ongoing symptoms and incapacity were no longer causally linked to the covered right hip/thigh sprain. (c) Whether the Reviewer, in her decision dated 19 November 2024, correctly awarded only certain of the requested costs claimed on behalf of Ms Ratnam. [3] Judge Spiller determined in his decision of 27 March 2025 - (a) A diagnosis in an ARTP is not a claim for cover and therefore Ms Ratnam was not entitled to deemed cover for trochanteric bursi...

5. 2020 NZEnvC 143 Envrionmental Defence Society Incorporated v New Zealand Aluminium Smelters Limited [pdf, 7.2 MB]

   ...Incorporated would requi re New Zealand Aluminium Smelters Limited to remove the ouvea premix from the Mataura site on a priority basis. EDS v NZAS - DECISION ON ACCESS TO RECORDS 2 [2] Laura Smith, a reporter engaged by Allied Press Limited, has requested copies of "the formal court record and any material associated with the case". 1 District Court (Access to Court Documents) Rules 2017 [3] Ms Smith has requested access to the formal court record. Rule 8(1) of the...

6. [2022] NZEmpC 68 KAQ v Attorney-General [pdf, 244 KB]

   ...Act provides that “[a]ny person may have access to court information of a senior court to the extent provided by, and in accordance with, rules of court.” As the Rules make clear, the Court may adopt a range of procedures for dealing with a request and any objections, including on the papers, which is the approach I consider appropriate in this case.2 [7] The Rules provide a general right of access to the formal Court record;3 there is no general right of access to other doc...

7. [2023] NZEnvC 046 Save the Maitai Incorporated v Nelson City Council [pdf, 246 KB]

   ...parties’ responses CCKV-BN [10] Counsel for CCKV-BN submits that it would be inefficient and unfair to witnesses and parties for a witness summons to be issued at this time. Mr Maassen 5 suggests an alternative approach whereby the summons request could be left for assessment and determination closer to the hearing. [11] In support of his submission that it would be premature at this stage to issue the summons, Mr Maassen observes that the summons is sought against a NCC...

8. [2024] NZEmpC 158 Chain & Rigging Supplies Ltd v Nikorima [pdf, 229 KB]

   ...Supplies Ltd v Nikorima (No 2) [2023] NZEmpC 134; Chain & Rigging Supplies Ltd v Nikorima (No 3) [2023] NZEmpC 148; and Chain & Rigging Supplies Ltd v Nikorima (No 4) [2023] NZEmpC 154. [2] On 20 October 2023, the applicant made a request for orders to deal with material that had been uplifted by a search process, against the background of the legal and IT expert analysis that had been undertaken to that point. [3] After hearing the parties on 30 November 2023, I iss...

9. OIA-110249.pdf [pdf, 3.5 MB]

   .... • T,,/,u u le 'fi,n 22 April 2024 Tena koe IJPIH Justice Centre I 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 I Wellington T 04 918 8800 J F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz I www.justice.govt.nz Ref: OIA 110249 Official Information Act request: Ministerial Arms Advisory Group Thank you for your email of 29 February 2024 to the New Zealand Police requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information regarding the Ministerial Arms Advisory Group (the Group)....

10. GF Ltd v D Ltd [2023] NZDT 204 (26 April 2023) [pdf, 163 KB]

    ...incompetent advice in relation to the ERA matter and/or by providing inadequate representation before the ERA? • If so, is D Ltd liable to pay a refund of all or part of the fees paid for the ERA case? • Is GF Ltd liable to pay damages in the form of an ‘early termination’ fee for GF’s cancellation, in early 2022, of the fixed term contract? Did D Ltd breach its contract with GF Ltd/IU Ltd by providing poor or incompetent advice in relation to the ERA matter and/or by pr...