ZA v YB LCRO 333/2012 (15 August 2014) - Costs Decision [pdf, 113 KB]
...Mr ZA made the following statements in his submissions:2 This is an issue that cannot reach a satisfactory conclusion. However, as Mr. YB’s (sic) rightly points out, we need to be aware of any costs to the profession and for those reasons also request that the Review Officer spend no further time in respect of any further consideration of an application for costs. Decision [8] Mr ZA’s submission overlooks the fact that I sought submissions from him with regard to the potential f...