Search Results

1. Recorded Music NZ Limited v Telecom NZ 6806 [2014] NZCOP 4 [pdf, 111 KB]

   ...infringements: $7.17 (d) Any other amount claimed: $750.00 [16] The Tribunal issued a notice of proceeding on 22 July 2014 giving the Respondent 10 working days (until 5 August 2014) to respond. No response was received. [17] Neither party has requested a hearing and the Tribunal does not consider one should be held. The application is therefore being determined on the papers pursuant to s122L of the Act. The enforcement notice [18] The Applicant notes that in decisions...

2. Recording Industry Association of New Zealand v Telecom NZ 2688 [2013] NZCOP 13 [pdf, 329 KB]

   ...above. [6] If a further infringement from the same IP address occurs within the specified timeframe (at least 28 days after the date of the detection but not more than nine months after it) and the rights holder sends a rights notice in proper form, the IPAP is required7 to send a “warning” notice. A warning notice must8, in addition to giving the same general naming and identifying materials of the detection notice, “identify the most recent detection notice issued to the accoun...

3. Chief Executive, Ministry for Culture and Heritage - Tāonga Tūturu found at Plimmerton (2012) 283 Aotea MB 166 (283 AOT 166) [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...resolution is valid, apply to the Registrar of the Maori Land Court for an order that confirms the owner or owners of the tāonga tūturu. (7) If 2 or more competing claims are lodged, and cannot be resolved, the chief executive may, if requested by a claimant, facilitate the applications of any or all of the claimants to the Maori Land Court. (8) For the purposes of this section, ownership, whether actual or traditional, includes (but is not limited to) collective or jo...

4. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 AT evidence chief Aut Karndacharuk [pdf, 2.5 MB]

   ...Area, the access prohibition may not be required. 49 Such restriction measures can be incorporated into the Marina carpark traffic and parking management plan. 50 I have considered whether a review condition without any restriction imposed (as requested by the Applicant) would suffice. However, I consider it is prudent to implement a condition restricting the Marina traffic use from the outset, with scope for modification or removal at a later stage, in order to fully understand...

5. [2015] NZEmpC 39 Scarborough v Micron Security Products Ltd [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...plaintiff filed a document entitled “Application Regarding Matters of Law” on 10 February. The document set out the reasons why Miss Scarborough considered that the Court should refer the matter back to the Authority; advised that she had requested an investigation into her dismissal by the Ministry of Social Development; contended that the Authority member had not carried out a thorough investigation and did not have material evidence to support her determination; and...

6. [2015] NZEnvC 066 Waiheke Marinas Limited [pdf, 572 KB]

   ...before taking their vehicle to the reserved marina parking area and returning on foot to their berth. Matiatia Direct Referral (Decision re out of scope) 7 [21] Mr Mitchell described steps that could be taken to upgrade the present poorly formed parking area on the Watercare land, and offered the view that compared to 94 vehicles that could presently be parked there, 143 spaces could be formed through better engineering and construction. This would offer 49 additional parking...

7. Peters v Eruera - Kaikoura No.4 (2011) 40 Waiariki MB 206 (40 WAR 206) [pdf, 131 KB]

   ...to give evidence. It was clear from her testimony, that due to her relationship to the respondent, the other trustees of Kaikoura 4 had not included her in decision making concerning this application. She has been deliberately excluded and her requests for information were not responded to. She has also been subjected to abuse from other trustees. The final witness called was Hiakita’s mother, Karera (Claris) Eruera who clarified issues regarding the occupancy of the block whe...

8. Warrington - Hopa Te Piki (2011) 2011 Chief Judge's MB 325 (2011 CJ 325) [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...and that they be provided with the opportunity to respond within 28 days. [10] A copy of the report was issued to the parties on 11 December 2007. Following that, in late December 2007, the case manager received a telephone call from Mrs Rore requesting further time to reply to the report. Despite that request nothing further was heard from Mrs Rore and so the file was returned to the Deputy Chief Judge on 10 March 2008. Then on 1 April 2008 the Deputy Chief Judge issued directio...

9. Hemi – Te Pupuke E1G1A (2013) 60 Taitokerau MB 151 (60 TTK 151) [pdf, 141 KB]

   ...the issue is of wider interest to Māori land owners in the Taitokerau district. [4] Second, whether there are proper grounds to cancel the occupation orders. Background [5] The land comprises 4.3782 hectares and is situated near Kaeo. It was formerly general land but was changed to Māori freehold land in 2003. It had been solely owned by the late Tui Hemi. At the time of the filing of the application the land was vested in Tui Hemi’s son, Richard Hemi, and her daughter, Coral...

10. ENVC Matiatia party corresp DMI amended applic out scope 20150130 [pdf, 680 KB]

    ...Quay Chambers Level 7, 2 Commerce Street PO Box 106215 AUCKLAND CITY 1143 (09) 374 1669 littleiohn@guaychambers.co.nz Advice to recipients of a copy of this application: If you wish to be heard on this application, you must lodge a notice in form 37 with the Environment Court within 15 working days after you were served with this notice. If you have any questions about this notice, contact the Environment Court in Auckland, Wellington or Christchurch. NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF P...