Search Results

1. Johnston v Hawea - Poukawa 13B Trust (2008) 193 Napier MB 243 (193 NA 243) [pdf, 136 KB]

   ...this matter, and that the tmstees followed them, did not entitle them to rely on that fact so they would not ultimately be removed. [15] There is one matter identified in the submissions of Mr Fergusson for Bonnie Hilton and Mr Hawea that does form a basis upon which I should grant a rehearing. This is the issue of costs payable personally by the Johnston faction. The issue of indemnity from the tmst funds. [16jAs I found earlier, it is clear to me that Mr Johnston was under the i...

2. Paki - Te Matai Kawana Whanau Trust (2004) 140 Aotea MB 290 (140 AOT 290) [pdf, 1 MB]

   ...although he provided verbal confirmation that he had in fact written the note, (ii) A letter from Mr Rangi Paki dated 24th August 2002 in support of his claim, 8, No receipts or other documentation was received from the applicant. g, The Court also requested the case manager to set out details of applications that had been filed with the Court and the application fees paid in respect to those applications, These details are now set out as follows: IIDate 9/05196 9/05/96 6/0910...

3. Tane-Stockler - Hauturu East 8 (2003) 122 Otorohanga MB 17 (122 OT 17) [pdf, 288 KB]

   ...applicants to seek reinstatement or reapply if they eventually acquire the shares. However, as I have fully considered the application it may be helpful to the parties if I set out my views on the merits of the application by way of obiter, that is, informal comment not binding on the parties or any other Court. I have also included some other comments relative to the position of the trusts which appeared relevant in the light of this application. My comments are made on the basis of...

4. Taiaroa - Section 15A Part Block B Otakou Māori Reserve and section 15 Block B Otakou Māori Reserve (2003) 103 South Island MB 174 (103 SI 174) [pdf, 300 KB]

   ...respect of Section 15B by 76.67% in favour. Ruku Arahanga who owned 10% shares in each block voted against the resolution. The Tuatini-Kerei Whanau Trust owned 7.38625 shares (10% ) in the 15A Block. Two of its trustees were present. This Trust was formed by the successors to Te Reimana Tuatini. This deceased was still recorded as owner of the 103 South Island Minute Book 175 same percentage of shares in the 158 Block. It appears that due to an oversight in searching his shares...

5. Baker v Mikaere - Manaia 1B and 2B Section D2C3B6 (2001) 103 Hauraki MB 52 (103 H 52) [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...land. The application by the Trustees was dated 28th of February 2001 and was filed in the Court on the 1 st of March 2001. ~. Hauraki Minute Book Volume 103 Folio 54 wording of the minutes is said to be: Page 3 11 There have been two requests for licence to occupy total shares which have been agreed upon by the Trust. They are Aida Mikaere (back corner boundary of 02C3B6 and Manaia No 6 Block) and Amelia Russell along the back of 02B2 and Makuini boundary. 11 A dispute o...

6. Singh v Patel [2019] NZIACDT 29 (9 May 2019) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...went ahead and prepared an application ready for lodgement with Immigration New Zealand, with Mr Singh paying $10,000. However, prior to lodgement, a dispute arose between Mr Patel and Mr Singh. The latter uplifted the file on 21 May 2014 and requested a refund of his fees. Mr Patel initially declined a refund. [6] Mr Singh made a wide-ranging complaint against Mr Patel to the Immigration Advisers Authority (the Authority) on 10 July 2014. At the prompting of the Registrar of Im...

7. [2019] NZEnvC 001 Tauranga Environmental Protection Society Incorporated v Tauranga City Council [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...be determined in the abstract as it requires evidence both for general context and in order to assess the proposal in terms of the relevant objectives and policies of the applicable statutory planning documents. Counsel further submit that the request for a preliminary determination amounts to an attempt to get the Court to assist one party in its litigation strategy at the expense of the other parties. They point out that the resolution of the question will not avoid the need for a...

8. FG v TT [2018] NZDT 1060 (9 March 2018) [pdf, 134 KB]

   ...this email but contend that FG took too long to notify them of any rejections. However, they did not respond to the email of April 2016 with any timeframe requirement for rejection so there was no timeframe determined by the contract formed between the parties. I find that given all the above, and particularly the nature of the product, being live plant material, and the quantity supplied (54,000 rootstocks), it was reasonable for FG to examine individual cuttings...

9. Family Court Rewrite Submission - FDR Centre [pdf, 371 KB]

   From: John Green s 9(2)(a) Sent: Monday, 25 February 2019 4:14 p.m. To: FamilyJusticeReforms <FamilyJusticeReforms@justice.govt.nz> Cc: s 9(2)(a) Subject: RE: Meeting with the Independent Panel considering the 2014 family justice system reforms Kia ora s 9(2)(a) I would like to thank the Panel for the opportunity to hear from them regarding proposed changes to the family justice system and to provide comment on the day and by way of further corr

10. BORA Smoke-free Environments (Prohibiting Ssmoking in Motor Vehicles Carrying Children) Amendment Bill [pdf, 140 KB]

    ...Bill, which is ultimately intended to protect children and young people from the harms associated with second hand smoke. The search is of the occupants of a motor vehicle on a road and extends only to the stopping of that vehicle while limited information is collected about the occupants. We consider that the search involves a minimal intrusion into privacy and is for a reasonable purpose connected to the objective of the Bill. 9. On this basis, we regard searches under the Bill as b...