Search Results

Search results for forms.

19922 items matching your search terms

  1. Canterbury Westland Standards Committee 2 v Mr U [2024] NZLCDT 4 (9 February 2024) [pdf, 173 KB]

    THE INTERIM ORDERS FOR NON-PUBLICATION OF THE NAME OF THE FIRM WHO EMPLOY MR U AND ALL COMPLAINANT NAMES ARE MADE PERMANENT ORDERS. THERE ARE FURTHER PERMANENT ORDERS FOR NON-PUBLICATION OF THE NAME OF MR U, HIS CHILDREN AND FORMER WIFE. THESE ORDERS MADE PURSUANT TO S 240 LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS ACT 2006. NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2024] NZLCDT 4 LCDT 018/23 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWE

  2. [2023] NZEmpC 193 Le Gros v Fonterra Cooperative Group Ltd [pdf, 284 KB]

    ...out, the directive sat outside both the individual employment agreement that Mr Le Gros had been on and the collective agreement that he moved to in 2021. [11] By the time Mr Le Gros became covered by the collective agreement he had performed over 15 years of continuous service for Fonterra. He had performed that service while party to an individual employment agreement. The question that arose was whether Mr Le Gros was entitled to two weeks’ long service leave under the...

  3. Cockburn v Accident Compensation Corporation (Personal Injury) [2023] NZACC 93 [pdf, 240 KB]

    ...possibility. Blood sugar levels were also monitored with regard to possible diabetic foot complications, although the patient’s Hba1c fell within pre-diabetic levels. Wound review/dressing was regularly carried out, and the district nurse was requested to provide the ongoing wound care. The patient was consistently given what I would consider appropriate treatment and advice, and treatment was adjusted when the patient appeared to adversely react to the treatment provided. Speci...

  4. Spray Marks NZ Ltd v Accident Compensation Corporation (Industry Classification) [2023] NZACC 127 [pdf, 454 KB]

    ...170(3) invests the Corporation with a discretion to classify the employer’s employees in separate classification units for different activities, if the employer meets the threshold (if any) specified in regulations and if – a. The employer so requests; and b. The employer is engaged in 2 or more distinct and independent activities; and c. Each of those activities provides services or products to external customers in such a way that each activity could, without adaptatio...

  5. Cribb - Succession to Tieme Karepe, Te One Karepe, Hoani Karepe and Porokuru Te Kiwi [2025] Chief Judge's MB 373 (2025 CJ 373) [pdf, 366 KB]

    ...as a result of the orders made. Reference to areas of difficulty 34. The original succession file for Teone Karepe and Tiemi Karepe (32 T 117-119) could not be located in the records of the Māori Land Court (Waikato Maniapoto District). A request has been sent to the Te Waipounamu District and they have provided some information from the block order files for Wairau 12D2 and Orakauhamu 26B2F. Similarly the succession file for Porokuru Te Kiwi (155 ROT 234 ) has not been loca...

  6. West v Accident Compensation Corporation (Vocational independence) [2024] NZACC 138 [pdf, 265 KB]

    ...2020, Ms West stood up from her chair in the garage and fell over onto the concrete floor, and hit her left knee and head, resulting in a centimetre-long cut above her right eye. [7] On 7 April 2020, Dr Adrian Pett, GP, filed an ACC injury claim form for Ms West for an open wound of the forehead and a left knee abrasion on 6 April 2020. The claim was automatically accepted that day. [8] On 24 April 2020, Dr Tariq Ali, GP referred Ms West to Concussion Services, with ongoing...

  7. 3-Strikes-Proactive-Release-OIA-Requests_Final_Part4.pdf [pdf, 14 MB]

    2 From: Smith, Harry <Harry.Smith@justice.govt.nz> Sent: Wednesday, 27 March 2024 12:47 pm To: Forman, Judith <Judith.Forman@justice.govt.nz> Subject: RE: Urgent three strikes research Thank you so much! I forgot to mention, the second article I am after is the article with the same title, the one I linked you is a review (which I won’t have a need of!) Punishment and Democracy: Three Strikes and You're Out in California. By Franklin E. Zimring, Gordon Hawkins an

  8. Oranga Tamariki (Responding to Serious Youth Offending) Amendment Bill [pdf, 422 KB]

    ...for subsequent supervision is not made at the time of the initial supervision with activity order, the potential duration of the young person’s total period of supervision is unknown at the time of disposition. The young person is therefore in a form of further “jeopardy” during their initial period of supervision with activity following initial sentencing. There will need to be strong justification for further conditions to be imposed.6 A court exercising the discretion will need t...

  9. 2025] NZEmpC 171 NZEI Te Tiu Roa Inc v Secretary for Education [pdf, 265 KB]

    ...2025, they would be assumed to be participating in the partial strike action. Ms Davies states that they were told by a number of managers who issued the communication to their team members that employees were advised by NZEI not to respond to the request for confirmation. There is an email from a manager annexed to Ms Davies affidavit about that. This email presented an opportunity for service managers and field staff to advise they were not parties to the strike action. This w...

  10. [2007] NZEmpC CC 15/07 Terry Young Ltd v New Zealand Engineering Printing and Manufacturing Union Inc [pdf, 41 KB]

    ...procedures and requirements applying in respect of the workplace that relate to- (i) safety or health; or (ii) security. (3) A representative of a union exercising the right to enter a workplace must, at the time of the initial entry and, if requested by the employer or a representative of the employer or by a person in control of the workplace, at any time after entering the workplace, − (a) give the purpose of the entry; and (b) produce- (i) evidence of his or her identity;...