Search Results

1. [2023] NZREADT 34 - IX v REAA (CAC2102) (8 December 2023) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...register under ss 64 (particularly s 64(a)(iv)) and 66 (particularly s 66(1)(f)(v)) remains intact.16 The only exception to mandatory publication of the decisions with the name of the licensee, is an order by the Tribunal under s 108 of the Act, as requested by the licensee.17 [27] Accordingly, the Tribunal orders, under s 108(1), that the decisions of the Committee of 9 September 2022 and 27 February 2023 are to be published without stating the names of the licensee or the agency...

2. [2023] NZEmpC 114 Jeon v A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...directed to file sequential submissions, which they have done. Counsel for the applicant has advised the Court that the applicant does not intend to file any submissions in reply. I proceed to deal with the application on the papers. [2] The formal notice of application relies on four grounds, namely that the applicant’s de novo challenge is being pursued in good faith; that if the applicant is wholly successful on her challenge, she will not be liable for anything; that importa...

3. MOJ0607-Stopping-a-child-being-taken-overseas-Samoan.pdf [pdf, 277 KB]

   ...E mafai na faia se faailoilo mo le silafia e Leoleo ma le aufaigaluega i le tuaoi pe afai e taumafai se tasi e aveese ma fafo atu o Aotearoa Niu Sila lou alo. Afai e te manao e fai se faailoilo i le tuaoi, e moomia na e faia se ‘Border Alert Request’ pe a faia se talosaga mo se ‘Order Preventing Removal.’ E te maua pepa talosaga mai le: • upegatafailagi a le Ministry of Justice • telefoni vili fua 0800 224 733 e talosaga ai mo se kopi e lafo atu i le pusameli. O ai e m...

4. 2023 NZPSPLA 055 [pdf, 166 KB]

   ...security company or working as a security guard without a CoA could be fined up to $20,000. .. Tyrin, employed by LPS, did not appear to have a CoA at all… Stewart did not mention whether Tyrin holds a CoA, and did not respond to our repeated requests for comment. “ [18] It is also of concern to me that Ms Stewart and her employees have had significant interaction with the Police over the years and yet the Police have never raised the question of their regulatory compliance...

5. [2023] NZEmpC 146 A Labour Inspector v ZAQ Ltd [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...afternoon. [10] Mr La Hood has certified that: (a) the grounds on which the application relies are made out; and (b) all reasonable inquiries and all reasonable steps have been made or taken to ensure the application contains all relevant information, including any opposition or defence that might be relied on by any other party, or any facts that would support the position of any other party. The Employment Court may make freezing orders [11] Under s 190(3) of the Act, the...

6. 2023-09-26-SOE_-Peter-Stacey_Air-Quality.pdf [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...provide a continuation of this dataset and allow comparisons with baseline (before the Project) measurements to assess the effectiveness of dust mitigation in this area of the Project. The data can also be shared with the residents of Manakau (if requested of the Regional Councils) to provide comfort that dust is not adversely affecting their properties. [19] I support the inclusion of this additional monitoring and consider that it will benefit the Project. Triggers for dust...

7. [2023] NZEnvC 169 Waikato Regional Council v Rawhiti Environmental Park Limited [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...the parties that they need to be realistic about what can be achieved to address the ongoing adverse environmental effects. There have been serious discharges to land which have entered water. I advised that I was tentatively of the view that the request for extension was appropriate but would need to see immediate steps taken. I also advised the parties that the Court would continue to monitor this matter to ensure that intermediate and long-term steps were put in place as the situ...

8. [2023] NZEnvC 136 Quigley v Waikato District Council [pdf, 897 KB]

   ...section 279(1) of the Act, such order being by consent, rather than representing a decision or determination on the merits. The Court understands for present purposes that: 6 (a) all parties to the proceedings have executed the memorandum requesting this order; and (b) all parties are satisfied that all matters proposed for the Court’s endorsement fall within the Court’s jurisdiction, and conform to the relevant requirements and objectives of the Act including, in particu...

9. [2024] NZEnvC 059 Wildon Dairy Limited v Central Otago District Council [pdf, 1 MB]

   ...for the court's endorsement fall within the court's jurisdiction and conform to the relevant requirements and objectives of the Act including, in particular, Pt 2. Outcome [7] All parties to the proceeding have executed the memorandum requesting the orders. On the information provided to the court, I am satisfied that the orders will promote the purpose of the Act so I ·will make the orders sought. J J M Hassan Environment Judge mckeech EC Seal 4 Appendix 1 - Con...

10. [2024] NZEnvC 067 Waikato Regional Airport Limited v Waikato District Council [pdf, 418 KB]

    ...under section 279(1) of the Act, such order being by consent, rather than representing a decision or determination on the merits. The Court understands for present purposes that: (a) All parties to the proceedings have executed the memorandum requesting this order; and (b) All parties are satisfied that all matters proposed for the Court’s endorsement fall within the Court’s jurisdiction, and conform to the relevant requirements and objectives of the Act including, in particu...