Search Results

1. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 AC evidence chief Marcus Cameron [pdf, 151 KB]

   31548793:629148 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 ("Act") AND IN THE MATTER of a Notice of Motion under section 87G of the Act requesting the granting of resource consents to Waiheke Marinas Limited to establish a marina at Matiatia Bay, Waiheke Island, in the Hauraki Gulf (ENV-2013-AKL-000174) STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF MARCUS JOHN CAMERON (ANTIFOULING CONTAMINANTS) ON BEHALF OF AUCKLAN...

2. GLCADS v Bishop of Auckland (Camera In-Court Application by TVNZ) [2013] NZHRRT 16 [pdf, 53 KB]

   ...addresses by counsel for the plaintiff and counsel for the defendant. In all other respects, the plaintiff is opposed to the application on the grounds: [4.1] The filming of the first ten minutes of the addresses by each party will adequately inform the nature and subject matter of the proceeding. [4.2] The presence of cameras is likely to impact adversely on the hearing and in particular on the giving of evidence. [4.3] The public can be fully informed of the nature of the proceeding...

3. Canterbury Westland Standards Committee v Lewis [2015] NZLCDT 18 [pdf, 252 KB]

   ...judgment had been delivered. c. That she had filed the memorandum referred to in paragraph 5(c) above. [7] The respondent’s response has been that the memorandum related to a one- off occasion only. She said that the change originated from a request through the office of the father’s counsel; that she contacted her client about it; and received her consent to it. [8] The respondent accepted that she did not contact counsel for the child about it because it involved only the...

4. ENVC Matiatia expert witness ecology conditions 2014 [pdf, 243 KB]

   ...provide written certification of the equipment/vessel and/or structure having been inspected and where necessary appropriately treated by way of best available practice. A copy of the certification shall be provided to the Team Leader-Coastal on request. The consent holder shall not allow the use of any vessel under its control or direction, or otherwise associated with the construction of the marina: (i) That is not certified as having been treated and inspected as required by this c...

5. Law v CAC 20004 & Fonteyn Developments Ltd [2014] NZREADT 81 [pdf, 36 KB]

   ...fine of $2,500. The Stance of the Appellant [13] Mr Rea submits that there does not need to be a “blanket” disclosure made of every issue potentially affecting a property or prospective purchaser immediately to every person who makes any request about, or who views a property, no matter how casual or fleeting the interest. He puts it that it is necessary to apply a common sense approach, and that the nature and timing of the disclosure which is required will depend upon all of t...

6. EU v VK LCRO 233 / 2010 (9 August 2011) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...the Law Society‟s assessment of the issues was too narrow, and that other lawyers who had been involved in or knew of the case ought to have been contacted. She asked that I take into account the combination of issues in her application, and requested me to speak to the various lawyers who are, or have been, involved in the proceedings. [11] The Applicant considered that her legal bills had increased due to the Practitioner‟s conduct. Her desired outcomes which included a w...

7. Miller-Hard v Stewart [pdf, 52 KB]

   ...page 4 of 8 3.5 Mr Morrison had been a Third Party in the District Court proceedings, but had been removed as a party prior to the proceedings being transferred to the WHRS adjudication. Therefore, as the Claimant had requested the matter be transferred to this adjudication without Mr Morrison as a party, I must presume that she did not consider that he should have been a party. 3.6 The Claimant identified Mr Morrison in the Notice of Adjudication as the

8. Dunworth v McLachlan [2010] NZWHT Auckland 25 [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...thinks fit; and (b) determine the claim concerned on the basis of the information available to it; and (c) give any weight it thinks fit to information that— (i) it asked for, or directed to be provided; but (ii) was provided later than requested or directed. [13] Section 117, as outlined above, provides that service is sufficient if the notice or document is posted or left at the party’s usual or last known place of residence or business. The Tribunal records show...

9. O'Connor v Macdee McLennon Construction Limited [2012] NZWHT Auckland 14 [pdf, 170 KB]

   ...remaining timber framing; reinstate cladding with a drained cavity system; repair base plate framing and hidden joinery; ensure adequate continuation of the upstand; replace required deck membrane; reinstall joinery with suitable flashings; form deck balustrade tops in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions with required flashings; texture and paint the outside; and reinstate and paint internal linings. [15] An extended roof flashing was also recommen...

10. Rameka v Hall - Opepe Farm Trust [2012] Māori Appellate Court MB 167 (2012 APPEAL 167) [pdf, 134 KB]

    ...memorandum dated 10 November 2011 seeking costs. The respondent states that costs of $21,000.00 have been incurred in respect of the appeal and they seek costs “... at close to an indemnity basis”. [4] The appellants’ memorandum in reply requests that the question of costs be deferred until after an appeal to the Court of Appeal has been determined. They oppose costs being awarded on an indemnity basis in the event costs are deemed appropriate. The Law [5] The law and pri...