Search Results

1. Xu v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 412) and Lim and Lynch [2018] NZREADT 63 [pdf, 293 KB]

   ...“substantial, now as new, five-bedroom home”, “the subject of a high-end rebuild”, and as “now thoroughly modern”. [5] Mr Xu and his wife viewed the property with Mr Lim on 27 August 2017. That evening, Mr Lim emailed a property information file for the property, which included the LIM report, to Mr Xu. Initially, this was not received by Mr Xu, and Mr Lim re- sent the information, in two separate emails. [6] Mr Xu sent an acknowledgement of receipt to Mr Lim, but his...

2. Ashworth v Kent (Strike-Out Application) [2018] NZHRRT 55 [pdf, 475 KB]

   ...Kent and [the RN] have differing recollections of whether a cross- checking procedure occurred. 3. Dr Kent stated that he stopped and took some time to consider what to do, before talking to Mrs Ashworth about it. Dr Kent told HDC that he then informed Mrs Ashworth of the options available to her, and believed he obtained her consent to proceed with the KAMRA inlay in her left eye. Dr Kent then inserted the KAMRA inlay into her left eye. [8] The Commissioner found Dr Kent breached the...

3. Dr Roger Grace - Evidence in Chief [pdf, 667 KB]

   ...maintained with measurable and transparent monitoring. (e) Monitoring regime would be appropriate to achieve ecological health; Monitoring on its own does nothing. It is important to use results from monitoring to feed back into controls and information sharing with appropriate Authorities to help maintain a desired level of ecological function and achieve collective biodiversity and habitat values. To this end monitoring of crayfish and snapper populations will inform monitoring...

4. [2019] NZEnvC 176 Upper Clutha Environmental Society Inc v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 27 MB]

   ...consistent with the issues listed below are incorporated into the PC1 where they are additional to those detailed in Appendices A-D and paragraphs 1 and 2 above. 7. That the Landscape Lines shown on the ODP maps are rolled over in their exact current form. That the Landscape Lines additional to those contained on the ODP maps, shown on the [PC1] Stage 1 maps, are included in the PC1 as dotted lines (with the exception of the two locations at Dublin Bay/Mount Brown, Waterfall Hill/...

5. BORA - APEC 2021 Bill [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...aerodrome, a leaders’ event, or a protected person’s accommodation. To do so, a constable must reasonably believe the closure is required to ensure the security of protected persons while travelling. In addition to the road or marine area that forms the actual transport route itself, a constable may also close roads and marine areas in the vicinity of the transport route, along with places adjacent to, or in the vicinity of, the route. 20. An owner or occupier of any place tha...

6. Mokaraka v Mokaraka - Waima C8 [2022] Māori Appellate Court MB 17 (2022 Appeal 17) [pdf, 343 KB]

   ...application that was supported, to the Māori Land Court to constitute a whānau trust. Once the Registrar had confirmed that orders had issued, the appeal was to be referred back to the Appellate Court for dismissal. Te tono mō te tū anō Request to reconvene Counsel for the respondents subsequently sought a direction that the appeal be reconvened and determined by the Māori Appellate Court.3 Counsel submitted that: (a) When the agreement was made, the appellants had contr...

7. [2021] NZEnvC 075 Ngati Paoa Trust Board v Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...Act 2014, s 58(4). 6 Relevant legal framework [15] The purpose of the Act, set out in s 3, is to promote the identification, protection, preservation, and conservation of the historical and cultural heritage of New Zealand. The principles informing that purpose and which all persons performing functions and exercising powers under the Act must recognise are set out in s 4 as follows: (a) the principle that historic places have lasting value in their own right and provide evid...

8. [2022] NZREADT 23 - CAC 1904 v Bright (8 November 2022) [pdf, 278 KB]

   ...the property, Mr Bright grabbed her in a bear hug and kissed her very quickly several times full on the lips. 4 [15] Mr Rutherford met with Mr Bright on 18 July 2019. On the next day, Mr Rutherford sent an email to the complainant formally acknowledging her complaint email and outlining what action he had taken. [16] Mr Bright was suspended by Mr Rutherford on 22 July 2019 and his engagement with Mr Rutherford’s agency was terminated on 26 July 2019. [17] The C...

9. Incitement-of-Hatred-Hate-Crime-and-Discrimination_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 559 KB]

   ...hatred, hate crime and discrimination Date of issue: 22 March 2023 The following documents have been proactively released in accordance with Cabinet Office Circular CO (18) 4. Some information has been withheld on the basis that it would not, if requested under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA), be released. Where that is the case, the relevant section of the OIA has been noted and no public interest has been identified that would outweigh the reasons for withholding it....

10. Wilton TRI-2021-100-002 Procedural Order 7 [pdf, 225 KB]

    ...to considering the pleadings only and may assess evidence in determining whether to remove a party.6 Ellis J has observed that if the Tribunal is to hear and determine claims in an “expeditious and cost-effective way, [it] must be able to perform an active gate-keeping role in terms of both the joinder and removal of parties”.7 This can include the early receipt and assessment of evidence. [17] In circumstances where the evidence is contentious or challenged, or a party’s...